The Relationship between Lexical Fluency, Temporal Fluency, and Language Proficiency in Iranian EFL Context

Javad Rezazadeh Yazdeli, Morteza Mellati, Mostafa Mehdizadeh

Abstract


Lexical Fluency Units (LFUs) are strings of words that act like single items in language users’ mental lexicon. Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in analyzing them in learners’ speech and classifying them into different types (Ushigusa 2008, Wood 2012). The literature in this particular field of study stated that the higher use of lexical fluency units might lead to the higher score on tests of oral English proficiency; therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between lexical fluency, temporal fluency (TF), and proficiency. To conduct the study, forty Iranian EFL teachers with TOEFL scores above 570 were chosen. To ensure that they have acquired competency in communication by which they can be employed as an instructor in the real context, they took an Oral English Proficiency Test (OEPT). Then, the sounds recorded from OEPT were analysed by PRRAT and Transcriber software and the transcripts of their responses were also analysed for detection of lexical fluency units (LFUs). Results indicated that teachers who incorporated more LFUs in their speech had higher TF ratio and consequently higher proficiency score. The interpretations and implementations are also discussed.

 

Keywords: lexical fluency; temporal fluency (TF); lexical fluency units (LFUs); language proficiency; lexicon 


DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2201-09


Full Text:

PDF

References


Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.

Boers, F. & Limdstromberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System.Vol. 33, 225-238.

Daller, H., Milton, J. & Treffers-Daller. (2007). Modeling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Durrant, Ph. (2008). High frequency collocations and second language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nottingham University- Nottingham.

Farashaiyan, A. & Hua, T. K. (2012). On the relationship between pragmatic knowledge and language proficiency among Iranian male and female undergraduate EFL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of

English Language Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 33–46.

Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler & W. S-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior (pp. 85-101). New York: Academic Press.

Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task based language production of Native and Non-native Speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic tasks (pp.75-93). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.

Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context: Studies in Bilingualism 9 (pp. 123-148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ginther, A., Dimova, S. & Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, Vol. 27. No. 3, 379-399.

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.

Grogan, A., Jones, O. P., Ali, N., Crinion, J., Orabona, S., Mechias, M. L., Ramsden, S., Green, D. W. & Price, C. J. (2012). Structural correlates for lexical efficiency and number of languages in non-native speakers of English. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 50, 1347–1352. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.019

Jiang, N. & Nerkasova, T. M. (2007). The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. Modern Language Jurnal, Vol. 919. No. 3, 433-445.

Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A. (2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 21, 264–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.011

Jong, N. D. & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralisation. Language Learning, Vol. 61, No. 2, 533–568. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x

Kashiha, H. & Heng, C. S. (2014). Discourse Functions of Formulaic Sequences in Academic Speech across Two Disciplines. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 15-27. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1402-02

Koponen, M. & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 43-61). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Kormos, J. & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, Vol. 32. No. 2, 145-164.

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A qualitative approach. Language Learning, Vol. 41. No. 3, 387-417.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. London: Commercial Colour Press.

Lindstromberg, S. & Frank, B. (2008). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The power of assonance. System. Vol. 36, 423–436.

Luo, L,. Luk, G. & Bialystok, E. (2010). Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition, Vol. 114, 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.014

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning, Vol. 33. No.2, 135-158.

Mellati, M, Khademi, M, & Etela, P. (2015). Challenges of mediation theory and gender differences in Iranian EFL contexts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 5, No. 8, 1664-1671, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.17

Namvar, F. (2012). The relationship between language proficiency and use of collocation by Iranian EFL students. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 41–52.

Ong, J. & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 19, 218–233.

doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory:

Nativelike selection and native like fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191-225). London: Longman.

Rekart, D. & Dunkel, P. (1992). The utility of objective (computer) measures of the fluency of speakers of English as a second language. Applied Language Learning, Vol. 3. No. 2, 65 85.

Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, Vol. 14, 423-441.

Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 14, 357-385.

Towell, R., Hawkins, R. & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 17. No. 1, 84-119.

Underwood, G., Schmitt, N. & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye movement study into the processing. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 153-172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Ushigusa, Sh. (2008). The relationships between oral fluency and multiword units. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University- Purdue.

Wood, D. (2001). In search of fluency: What is it and how can we teach it? Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol. 57, 573-589.

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic Language and Second Language Speech Fluency. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Wood, D. (2012). Willingness to communicate and L2 fluency: Complexity and variety in a corpus of Japanese and Chinese ESL learner speech. In H.M. McGarrell, & R.Courchêne, (Eds.), Special Research Symposium Issue of CONTACT. Refereed Proceedings of TESL Ontario Research Symposium, 38(2), 23-39.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157