Cybercrimes are on the increase in China and ‘QQ’, an instant messenger platform, is frequently exploited for these crimes. Fraudsters manipulate language to deceive users into revealing their bank accounts or depositing sums in the cheats’ accounts. Employing the theoretical framework that includes Speech Act Theory and Politeness Theory, the researchers attempted to identify the strategies used by such fraudsters. The subjects of this study included 50 interlocutors who had already chatted with different online cheats and had a record of their conversations. The data were collected and analysed on the basis of the type of discourse themes displayed. Findings indicated that the chats displayed various themes like Business Invitation, Money Transfer, Account Hacking and Online Shopping. In addition, the three levels of speech acts of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary were discernible and most fraudsters did not bother to address face threatening acts. In comparison to hoax email writers, the fraudsters in instant communication regularly came across as more aggressive and imperative, but then softened their diction if victims were not interested to chat with them in real time. The implications of this study lie in the possibility of developing a model for fraudster or cheat discourse structure, thus alerting QQ users in particular of such crimes. Other online instant messenger users will also benefit from this study. Better informed of how cheats manipulate language to present untruth as truth and be alerted of the modus operandi involved in online deception, victims can be saved and the crime curbed.  The issue of the victim’s vulnerability and the reasons behind it certainly deserve further linguistic and metalinguistic scrutiny.

Keywords: cybercrimes; fraudsters; linguistic deception; speech acts; politeness

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University.

Behnam, B., & Amizadeh, N. (2011). A comparative study of the compliments and compliment responses between English and Persian TV interviews. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 17(1), 65-78.

Blommaert, J. (2005). Making millions: English, indexicality and Fraud. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chiluwa, I. (2010). The pragmatics of hoax email business proposals. Linguistic Online. Vol. 43

Chiluwa, I. (2009). Discourse of digital deceptions and 419 email. Discourse. Vol. 11, 635-636.

Chun-tao, G. U. O. (2011). Shallow research on the concept, main forms and crime constitute of Internet fraud [J]. Netinfo Security. Vol. 4, 28-35.

Coleman, L. & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language, 26-44.

Ekaning K. (2011). Pragmatic competence in the spoken English classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 1(1).

Galanxhi, H. & Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah. (2007). Deception in cyberspace: A comparison of text-only vs, avatar-supported medium. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies. Vol. 65, 770-783.

Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital Deception. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. 289-301.

Hancock, J. T., Curry. L. E., Goorha, S. & Woodworth, M. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes.

Herring. S. C., Stein, D. & Virtanen, T. (Eds.) (2013). Introduction to pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Handbook of Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication. 3-31.

Huang Yang (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford Press.

Kiang, N. Y. (2003). A discourse analysis of e-mail messages in a Malaysian business community. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 3(1).

Lu, Y., Zhou, T. & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human

Behavior. Vol. 25(1), 29-39.

Maros, M., & Rosli, L. (2017). Politeness strategies in Twitter updates of female English language studies Malaysian undergraduates. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 23(1).

McCarthy, P. M., Duran, N. D. & Booker, L. M. (2012). Devil is in the details: New directions in deception analysis. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference Publication.

O'Keeffe, A., Clancy, B. & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing pragmatics in Use. Routledge Taylorand Francis Group Publications.

Peccei, J. S. (1999). Pragmatics. Routledge Taylorand Francis Group.

Robichaud, A. & Blevins, C. (2011). Tooling up for digital humanities. Journal of Information Systems. Vol. 20(1), 69-92.

Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone Has to Lie. Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use.

Satu Elo & Helvi Kyngas. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Vol. 1, 107-115.

Searl, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning, Cambridge University Press.

Tan, K. H. & Woods, P. (2008) Media-related or generic-related features in electronic dictionaries: Learners’ perception and preferences. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 8(2), 1-17.

Tan, K. H. & Farashiyan, A. (2012) The effectiveness of teaching formulaic politeness strategies in making request to undergraduates in an ESL classroom. Asian Social Science. Vol. 8(15), 189-197.

Yule G. (1998). Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics. Pragmatics.

Yunus, M. M. et al. (2007). Language learning via ICT: Uses, challenges and issues. Journal WSEAS Transactions on Information Science

Applications. Vol. 6(9), 1453-1467.

Zhou, L. et al. (2003). An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. In System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual, IEEE, 10.

Zhou, L. & Sung, Y.W. (2008). Cues to deception in online Chinese groups. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual, IEEE, 146-146.

Zhou, L. & Zhang, D. (2004). Can online behavior unveil deceivers? An exploratory investigation of deception in instant messaging, 1EEE.

Zhou, L., et al. (2003). An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. In System Sciences,

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference, IEEE, 10.