Tasks in Explicit L2 Pronunciation Instruction: FonF vs. FonFS in Improving Phonemic Accuracy and Comprehensibility

Farhad Tabandeh, Ahmad Moinzadeh, Hossein Barati

Abstract


The effects of focusing second/foreign language (L2) learners’ attentions on phonological forms while communicating in meaningful discourse has recently attracted attention in L2 pronunciation research. One such treatment is focus-on-form (FonF) instruction wherein L2 learners practice and notice pronunciation features in communicative tasks rather than in decontextualized exercises and drills (i.e., focus-on-forms [FonFS]). Given this, the current study investigated the differential effects of FonF and FonFS instructions on improving Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ pronunciation of the most problematic English consonants. After identifying the problematic English consonants (i.e., /θ/, /ð/, /w/, /ŋ/) via remedial and expert judgment approaches, 45 pre-intermediate learners embarked on an 8-hour course. The experimental group received FonF, the comparison group received FonFS, and the control group had a free conversation class minus any feedback on the target consonants. Learners’ pronunciations were measured in terms of phonemic accuracy and comprehensibility in controlled and spontaneous tasks. The results of immediate and delayed post-test for phonemic accuracy revealed that whereas both FonF and FonFS were equally effective in controlled tasks, only FonF instruction proved effective up to the delayed post-test in spontaneous tasks; no such improvements, however, were observed for the control group. Results also showed that improvements in phonemic accuracy led to overall comprehensibility enhancements in EFL learners’ speech. The article concludes with some pedagogical implications of the findings.   

 

Keywords: Comprehensibility; FonF; FonFS; L2 pronunciation; phonemic accuracy 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Abdely, A. & Thai, Y. (2016). Learning English vowels by Iraqi EFL learners: Perceived difficulty versus actual performance. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(1), 1-18

Allen, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, J. (2017). A potted history of PPP with the help of ELT Journal. ELT Journal, 71(2), 218-227.

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., Goodwin, J. M. & Griner, J. M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Blackwell.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In J. Williams & B. VanPatten (Eds.). Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.), (pp. 95-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.

Dlaska, A., & Krekeler. C. (2013). The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25–37.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 18-41.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 1-24.

Gooch, R., Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners. System, 60(2), 117-127.

Growther, D., Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P. & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 15(1), 80-95.

Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Kang, O. (2015). Learners’ perceptions toward pronunciation instruction in three circles of world Englishes. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 59-80.

Kissling, E. M. (2013). Teaching pronunciation: is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners? The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 720-744.

Ladefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2015). A Course in Phonetics. Hampshire: Cengage Learning Publications.

Lee, J., Jang, J. & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta- analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345-366.

Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing Contexts and Shifting Paradigms in Pronunciation Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3). 369-377.

Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

McKinnon, S. (2017). TBLT instructional effects on tonal alignment and pitch range in L2 Spanish imperatives versus declarative. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 1-31.

Rahimi, M. & Tavakoli, M. (2015). The Effectiveness of CALL in Helping Persian L2 Learners Produce the English Vowel /ɒ/. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15(3), 17-30.

Roohani, A. (2013). A comparative study of intuitive-imitative and analytic-linguistic approached to teaching pronunciation: Does age play a role? The Asian EFL Journal, 24(1), 87-127.

Saito, K. (2011a). Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: an instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20(1), 45-59.

Saito, K. (2011b). Identifying problematic segmental features to acquire comprehensible pronunciation in EFL settings: The case of Japanese learners of English. RELC, 42(3), 363-378.

Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 Pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(4), 595-633.

Saito, K. & Shintani, N. (2016). Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive comprehensibility in second language speech? TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 421-446.

Saito, K., Trofimovich, P. & Isaacs, T. (2015). Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization Study. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 1-25.

Spada, N. & Tomita, T. (2010). Interactions between types of instruction and type of language feature: A meta- analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263-308.

Sturm, J. (2013). Explicit phonetics instruction in L2 French: A global analysis of improvement. System, 41(4), 654-662.

Thomson, R. & Derwing, T. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326-344.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2401-09

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157