Interrogativity is a linguistic property in all world languages. It is inherently related to the ‘question-answer’ tandem of turn-taking. One notable feature of turn-taking is the adjacency pairs, where the question-and-answer sequences are part of. The canonical turn-taking model by Sacks et al. (1974) highlights the obligation to answer the questions. In this paper, however, we report the many cases of no-answered and non-answered questions in faculty meetings using the analytical framework of Conversation Analysis. We show that the Filipinos’ high-context communication style has impinged on the occurrences of these types of answers. We then illustrate a turn-taking model for this type of communication, wherein a straightforward answer is no longer obligatory, but becomes optional within the frame of high-context communication style of the Filipino context. The questioning party can just “let it go” and accept the indirect response as a legitimate and true answer to the question. Towards the end, we argue that the results may convey that the faculty meeting, which is considered as an institutional talk, has resembled ordinary mundane conversations, where questions are oftentimes taken for granted.

Keywords: Conversation Analysis; faculty meeting; Filipino communication style; high-context communication; question-answer system

Barnes, B. E. (2007). Culture, conflict, and mediation in the Asian Pacific (rev.). University Press of America.

Bavelas, J. B., & Gerwing, J. (2011). The listener as addressee in face-to-face dialogue. International Journal of Listening, 25(3), 178-198.

Brown, P. (2010). Questions and their responses in Tzeltal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2627-2648.

Enfield, N. J. (2010). Questions and responses in Lao. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2649-2665.

Englert, C. (2010). Questions and responses in Dutch conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2666-2684.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

Hayashi, M. (2010). An overview of the question-response system in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2685-2702.

Heinemann, T. (2010). The question-response system in Danish. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2703-2725.

Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427-1446.

Heritage, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 42–68). Oxford University Press.

Hernandez, V. V. (2000). Conversational analysis: An application in the Philippine setting. Journal of English Studies and Comparative Literature, 6(1), 62-83.

Hoymann, G. (2010). Questions and responses in ╪Ākhoe Hai||om. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2726-2740.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins.

Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.

Levinson, S.C. (2010). Questions and responses in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2741-2755.

McGee, D., Vento, A. D., & Bavelas, J. B. (2005). An interactional model of questions as therapeutic interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(4), 371-384.

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics and sociolinguistics. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics (pp. 50-58). Elsevier.

Munalim, L. O., & Genuino, C. F. (2021). Chair-like turn-taking features in a faculty meeting: Evidence of local condition and collegiality. Linguistics International Journal, 15(1), 43-64.

Munalim, L. O., Genuino, C. F., & Tuttle B. E. (2022). Question-declaration coupling in a university meeting talk: Discourse of social inequality and collegiality. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 400-417.

Norlin, C., Sharp, A. L., & Firth, S.D. (2007). Unanswered questions prompted during pediatric primary care visits. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 7(5), 396-400.

Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49-71.

Power, R. J. D., & Dal Martello, M. F. (1986). Some criticisms of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson on turn taking. Semiotica, 58, 1/2, 29-40.

Rossano, F. (2010). Questioning and responding in Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2756-2771.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.

Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.

Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1-63.

Schegloff, E. A. (2009). One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 357-406). Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (2010). Commentary on Stivers and Rossano: "Mobilizing response". Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 38-48.

Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.

Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1974). Opening up closings. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodoloqy (pp. 69-99). Penguin.

Siemund, P. (2017). Interrogative clauses in English and the social economics of questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 199, 15-32.

Stivers, T. (2001). Negotiating who presents the problem: Next speaker selection in pediatric encounters. International Communication Association, 252-282.

Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2772-2781.

Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 3–31.

Yoon, K. E. (2010). Questions and responses in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2782-2798.