Stylistic Analysis of Deictic Expressions in President Benigno Aquino III’s October 30th Speech

Edward Jay Mansarate Quinto

Abstract


This paper analyses how the President of the Philippines, Benigno Simeon Aquino III, or simply PNoy, deployed persons, time, location and social relationships in the English translation of his October 30th  televised national address and what meaning and effect does such deployment of referring expressions bring about in understanding the nature of the political speech. Using the frameworks of Hanks (2005) and Buhler (1934), this paper examines how, PNoy strategically sets up the deictic field by placing several personal, temporal, spatial and social deictic expressions in what initially is a ground zero. The deployment creates a deictic field in which the Filipino people are situated at deictic centre and the President and his critics are in binary opposition. PNoy’s deployment of deictic expressions is very effectively done so that the deictic centre is persuaded to judge the president and his government favourably and the binary opposite in the deictic field, unfavourably. Through a systematic stylistic account of deixis in political speech, this paper argues that not only personal deixis, as previous studies put forth, but also temporal, spatial and social deixis helps political actors to persuade the audience in their favour and ultimately boost leverage in their political discourse and outside.

 

DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-01

 

Keywords: deictic expressions; deictic field; ground zero; language in politics; stylistic analysis

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abuya, E.J. (2012). A pragma-stylistic analysis of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan’s inaugural address. English Language Teaching 5(11), 8-15.

Adetunji, A. (2006). Inclusion and exclusion in political discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics 5(2), 177-191.

Al Azzawi, Q.U.D. (2011). Establishing the effect of deixis in translation. Journal of Babylon University Vol 19 (4), 585-605.

Aquino III, B.S. (2013, Oct. 30). Televised address of President Benigno S. Aquino III, October, 30, 2013 (English). Retreived from http://www.gov.ph/2013/10/30/televised-address-of-president-benigno-s-aquino-iii-october-30-2013-english/

Ayeomoni, O.M. (2012). Grapho-syntactic analysis of selected political speeches of some Nigerian Heads of state. Matatu - Journal for African Culture and Society 21, 319-339.

Buhler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: Die darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.

Fillmore, C.J. (1997). Lectures on deixis. Stanford CA: CSLL.

Hanks, W.F. (2005). Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology Vol 46 (2), 191-220.

Inigo-Mora, I. (2004). On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics 3(1), 27-52.

Kaylor, B.T. (2011). No Jack Kennedy: Mitt Romney's “Faith in America” speech and the changing religious-political environment. Communication Studies 62(5), 491-507.

Kuo, S. (2002). From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second- person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text 22(1), 29-55.

Kuo, S. (2001). Reported speech in Chinese political discourse. Discourse and Society 3(2), 8181-2002.

Lwaitama, A.F. (1988). Variations in the use of personal pronouns in the public oratory of J.K Nyerere and A.H Mwinyi. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 1, 1-23.

Maitland, K. & Wilson, J. (1987). Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 11(4), 495-512.

Naz, S., Alvi, S.D. & Baseer, A. (2012). Political Language of Benazir Bhutto : A Transitivity Analysis of Her Speech ‘Democratization in Pakistan.’ Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 4(8), 125-141.

Oluremi, A.O.C. (2012). A stylo-rhetorical analysis of Obafemi Awolowo’s “It is not life that matters.” International Journal of Asian Social Sciences 3(1), 216-228.

Sheveleva, A. (2012). Lingo-rhetorical and socio-pragmatic peculiarities in political speeches by Barack Obama. Intercultural Communication Studies 21(3), 53-62.

Suzuki T. & Kageura, K. (2010). Stylistic analysis of Japanese Prime Ministers' Diet addresses. In T. Tokunaga & A. Ortega (Eds.) LKR 2008. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Large-Scale Knowledge Resources, Tokyo, 3-5 March (pp. 318-325). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Urban, G. (1986). Rhetoric of a war chief. Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychological Studies No. 5 (pp. 1-27) Chicago: Center for Psychosocial Studies.

Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language. Oxford: Blackwell.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157