Modality in Spoken Malaysian English: A Comparison with the Supervarieties
Abstract
The interest in Malaysian English generated many studies on Malaysian English focusing on various grammatical features. However, modality in Malaysian English is still under-researched, especially in post-independence and new Englishes contexts. As a new variety of English, it raises questions on how Malaysian English has developed from the historical input variety, i.e., British English and how resistant or accepting Malaysian English is to American English which is highly influential globally. This study aimed to contribute to the development of Malaysian English studies by reporting a corpus-based research of the frequency and statistical differences of a set of modal and quasi-modal verbs in three spoken corpora representing Malaysian, British, and American English. AntConc software (Version 3.5.9) (Anthony, 2020) was used to explore and generate the relevant data in the spoken Malaysian English corpus, while the spoken British and American English corpora were accessed online using the tools on the respective websites. The findings show that the use of modal and quasi-modal verbs in spoken Malaysian English does not entirely resemble either of the Supervarieties, i.e., spoken British English and American English. Log-likelihood test carried out in the study shows significant differences in the use of certain modal and quasi-modal verbs between the varieties, suggesting that Supervarieties are not always in the lead in using quasi-modals. The results also suggest that these significant differences are mainly accounted for by the nativisation process and evolution of Malaysian English as a new English variety. The findings shed new light on the current knowledge of modal and quasi-modal verbs in post-independence spoken Malaysian English.
Keywords: corpus-based; modal verbs; quasi-modal verbs; spoken Malaysian English; Supervarieties
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available at https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Azirah Hashim & Tan, R. (2012). Malaysian English. In Azirah Hashim, & E. L. Low (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, policy and language in use (pp. 55–74). John Benjamins.
Baskaran, L. M. (1994). The Malaysian English mosaic. English Today, 10(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400000857
Baskaran, L. M. (2005). A Malaysian English primer: Aspects of Malaysian English features. University of Malaya Press.
Collins, P. (2009a). Modals and quasi-modals in English. Rodopi.
Collins, P. (2009b). Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes, 28(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01593.x
Collins, P., & Yao, X. (2013). Colloquial features in World Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4). 479–505. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.02col
Collins, P., Borlongan, A. M., & Yao, X. (2014). Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(1). 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213511462
Davies, M. (2008-). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.
Declerck, R. (2011). The definition of modality. In A. Patard, & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistermic modality (pp. 21–44). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.29.05dec
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2021). Mood and modality in English. In B. Aarts, A. McMahon, & L. Hinrichs (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 207–227). UK: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119540618.ch12
Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74. https://aclanthology.org/J93-1003
Hajar Abdul Rahim. (2014). Malaysian English lexis: Postcolonial and beyond. In Hajar Abdul Rahim, & Shakila Abdul Manan (Eds.), English in Malaysia: Postcolonial and beyond (pp. 35–53). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Hansen, B. (2017). The ICE metadata and the study of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 36(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12282
Harris, M. (1986). English Ought (to), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries: In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of hisf birthday. In D. Kastovski, & A. Szwedek (Eds.), Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics (pp. 345-358). Amsterdam: Mouton
de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856132.347
Huber, M. (2019). Unearthing the diachrony of world Englishes. In D. Schreier, M. Hundt, & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of world Englishes (pp. 484–505). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108349406.021
Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non‐native Englishes. London: Pergamon.
Kachru, Y., & Nelson, C. L. (2006). World English in Asian contexts. Hong Kong University Press.
Krug, M. (2000). Emerging English modals. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980
Khojasteh, L., & Kafipour, R. (2012). Are Modal Auxiliaries in Malaysian English Language Textbooks in Line with Their Usage in Real Language? English Language Teaching, 5(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p68
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press.
Loureiro-Porto, L. (2019). Grammaticalization of semi-modals of necessity in Asian Englishes. English World-Wide, 40(2), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00025.lou
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V. and McEnery, T. (2017). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
Mair, C. (2021). Recent advances in the corpus-based study of ongoing grammatical change in English. Text & Talk, 41(5-6), 763–785. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0039
Newbrook, M. (2006). Malaysian English: Status, norms, some grammatical and lexical features. In K. Bolton, & B. B. Kachru (Eds.), World Englishes: Critical concepts in Linguistics, Volume II (pp. 390–417). Routledge.
Noël, D., & Van der Auwera, J. (2015). Recent quantitative changes in the use of modals and quasi-modals in the Hong Kong, British and American printed press: Exploring the potential of Factiva® for the diachronic investigation of world Englishes. In P. Collins (Ed.),
Grammatical change in English world-wide (pp. 437–464). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.18noe
Palmer, F. (2015). Modality and English modals. Routledge.
Peters, P. (1994). American and British influence in Australian verb morphology. In U. Fries, G. Tottie, & P. Schneider (Eds.), Creating and using English language corpora (pp. 149–157). Rodopi.
Pillai, S., & L. T. Ong. (2018). English(es) in Malaysia. Asian Englishes, 20(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1459073
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambirdge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901
Shastri, S. V. (1988). The Kolhapur corpus of Indian English and work done on its basis so far. ICAME Journal, 12, 15–26.
Tan, S. I. (2013). Nativised prepositional verbs in Malaysian English from the perspective of language contact. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3),103–114. http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/archive
Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf. (2007). The use of modals in Malaysian ESL learners’ writing. [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Van Rooy, B. (2020). Grammatical change in South African Englishes. World Englishes, 40, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12470
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2803-08
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157