Ecofeminist Spirituality in Carole Lindstrom and Michaela Goade’s We Are Water Protectors
Abstract
Inspired by the Standing Rock Indigenous community's resistance to the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016, the children's picture book We Are Water Protectors (2020) by Carole Lindstrom and Michaela Goade portrays the ecological crisis through the relationships among nature, women, and spirituality. This study examines how the picturebook’s narrative and visual elements construct ecofeminist spirituality, especially the sacredness of nature and the spiritual interconnection between women and the natural world. It also studies how the picture book constructs collective female empowerment as a form of ecological resistance within an ecofeminist spiritual framework. Using a qualitative approach, this study applies Starhawk's ecofeminist spirituality and utilises Roland Barthes' semiotic theory to interpret the verbal and visual signs of the picturebook. The results show that this book presents nature as sacred, portraying water as a living entity with divine significance. A spiritual interconnection between women and nature shapes communal identity and affirms that all beings are related, expressed through the merging of women's bodies with water and ecological grief. The collective empowerment is grounded in Starhawk’s term ‘power from within’, [] with women leadingnonviolent resistance against the “black snake” as a symbol of ecological threat. This term accentuates spiritual integrity, cooperation, and spiritual strength. We Are Water Protectors voices an ecological ideology rooted in indigenous identity and ecofeminist spirituality, emphasising the intrinsic value of ecosystems and the interconnectedness of humans and nature. The book serves as a cultural and political medium for ecological education and resistance while encouraging environmental solidarity.
Keywords: Barthes’ semiotics; Carole Lindstrom and Michaela Goade; Starhawk’s ecofeminist spirituality; We Are Water Protectors
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, P. G. (1986). The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions. Beacon Press.
Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers (Ed.)). The Noonday Press.
Benton-Banai, E. (1988). The Mishomis Book - The Voice of the Ojibway. Indian Country Communications.
Braem, H. (2024). The Power of the Colours: Meaning & Symbolism. Elvea Verlag.
Busch, L., Malkin, A., & Belisle, J. (2025). Art in Context: A Multi-level Analysis of Art. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100890
Cajete, G. (2000). Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. Clear Light Publishers.
Campbell, A. (2008). New Directions in Ecofeminist Literary Criticism. Cambridge Scholars Publishing 15.
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Chandran, G., Seng, F. S., & Xian, R. T. Y. (2021). Re-Imagining Sita in Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s the Forest of Enchantments: A Spiritual Ecofeminist Reading. New Literaria, 2(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2022.v03i1.007
Chiblow, S. (2019). Anishinabek Women’s Nibi Giikendaaswin (Water Knowledge). Water, 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020209
Corbiere, A. O. (2019). Anishinaabe Headgear: Symbolic, Cultural and Linguistic Meanings. American Indian Art Magazine, 37(3), 38.
Diamond, I., & Orenstein, G. F. (1990). Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism. Sierra Club Books.
Dueck, B. (2018). 8 North American Indigenous Song, the Sacred and the Senses. Body and Religion, 2(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.36490
Eriksen, C., & Hankins, D. L. (2015). Colonisation and Fire: Gendered Dimensions of Indigenous Fire Knowledge Retention and Revival. The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Development, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383117
Gaard, G. (2009). Children’s Environmental Literature: From Ecocriticism to Ecopedagogy. Neohelicon, 36(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-009-0003-7
Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. Routledge.
Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. University of Georgia Press.
Goodreads. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2023, from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/44581496-we-are-water-protectors
Hagen, S. (2024). The Black Snake: Powerful Imagery in We Are Water Protectors. Climate Literacy in Education, 2(1), 52–59.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices Spectacle of the Other. Sage Publication, 391.
Hart, M. (2007). Indigenous Knowledge and Research: The Míkiwáhp as a Symbol for Reclaiming Our Knowledge and Ways of Knowing. First Peoples Child & Family Review 3(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069528ar
Hernawati, M. (2021). How Far the Ecowarrior Will Go: An Ecofeminist Reading of Disney’s Moana. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 27(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2704-18
Hu, S. (2024). The Dakota Access Pipeline: What You Need to Know. NRDC. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/dakota-access-pipeline-what-you-need-know
Johnston, B. (1976). Ojibway Heritage. McClelland and Stewart.
Kheong, C. Q. W., & Satkunananthan, A. H. (2025). Her Voice in the Forest: A Neo-Archetypal Eco feminist Analysis of Sang Kancil as the Female Mousedeer. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 31(1), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2025-3101-12
Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions.
Lindstrom, C., & Goade, M. (2020). We Are Water Protectors. Roaring Brook Press.
Malau, T. C., Kusumayanti, D. D., & Supiastutik, S. (2024). The Representation of Liberal Feminism in the Picture Book Mary Wears What She Wants by Keith Negley. Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v23i1.123800
Mellor, M. (1997). Feminism and Ecology: An Introduction. New York University Press.
Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about Pictures. University of Georgia Press.
Quinlan, E. (2007). Ritual Circles to Home in Louise Erdrich’s Character Names. Names, 55(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2007.55.3.253
Ryman, C. K. (2021). Listening to Heartbeat: the Pulse of Ecofeminism in a Picturebook. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 879–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1879733
Sipe, L. (2012). Revisiting the Relationships Between Text and Pictures. Children’s Literature in Education,43, pp. 4-21. DOI 10.1007/s10583-011-9153-0
Starhawk. (1988). Dreaming the Dark: Magic, Sex, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
Starhawk. (1999). The Spiral Dance: A Rebirth of the Ancient Religion of the Goddess. Harper One.
Stephens, J. (1992). Language and Ideology in Children’s Fiction. Longman.
Todd, W. F. K. S., Northbird, A. V., & Towne, C. E. (2023). The Science in Indigenous Water Stories, Indigenous Women’s Connection to Water. Open Rivers: Rethinking Water, Place & Community. https://openrivers.lib.umn.edu/article/science-in-indigenous-stories/
United Nations. (2024). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for Prosperity and Peace. Bernan Distribution.
Whyte, K. (2017). The Dakota Access Pipeline, Environmental Injustice, and US Settler Colonialism. Red Ink: An International Journal of Indigenous Literature, Arts, & Humanities, 19(1).
Zhao, Q., & Abdullah, A. Q. C. (2024). Metaphorical Meanings of Color Symbols in Literature. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 20(4), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2024-2030
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2026-3203-24
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157