VICINITY CONDITION OF ONLINE EXAMINATION: DOES IT AFFECT THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES OF PRE-UNIVERSITY STUDENTS?

Nurulhuda Mohammad Yusoff

Abstract


Physical attendance of students in a hall for examinations is no longer being practiced during the global pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Most universities, including Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA) have adapted to online exams. This paper presents an analysis of online final examination performances of 251 students from the Science and Medicine Foundation Centre, UniSZA who completed foundation for 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 intake sessions. The objective of this research is to compare the final scores of Semester 2 for the students from both sessions, if there is a significant difference between academic performance by taking online examination at home for 2019/2020 intake session and at the university for 2020/2021 intake session based on the subjects of Mathematics II, Physics II, Chemistry II, Biology II and Information Technology II. The z‑test was performed to compare mean scores for each subject for both intake sessions using Microsoft Excel worksheet. According to the mean value, students achieved higher score in Biology II, Chemistry II and Information Technology II by taking examination at hostel. Meanwhile, Physics II and Mathematics II subjects shows that the score are higher while taking examination at home. The p-value for each subject is computed, and the result is less than 0.025. The null hypothesis is then rejected.


Keywords


academic performances; Covid-19 pandemic; online examinations; SPSS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adri, H. T., Suwarjono, Sesrita, A., & Sudjani, D. H. (2021). The online assessment in education course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 52086.

Booth, R., Clayton, B., Hartcher, R., Hungar, S., Hyde, P., & Wilson, P. (2003). The development of quality online assessment in vocational education and training. Australia: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

Harmon, O. R. & Lambrinos, J. (2008). Are online exams an invitation to cheat? The Journal of Economic Education, 39 (2), 116-125.

Hosny, M., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism: University Case Study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14, 748-757.

Ilgaz, H., & Adanır, G. A. (2020). Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them? Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1255–1269.

Jaap, A., Dewar, A., Duncan, C., Fairhurst, K., Hope, D., & Kluth, D. (2021). Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests. BMC Medical Education, 21, 86.

Karaman, S. (2011). Examining the effects of flexible online exams on students’ engagement in e-learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(3), 259-264.

Lancaster, T. & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: a Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17 (3).

Li, M., Luo, L., Sikdar, S., Nizam, N. I., Gao, S., Shan, H., Kruger, M., Kruger, U., Mohamed, H., Xia, L., & Wang, G. (2021). Optimized collusion prevention for online exams during social distancing. npj Science of Learning 5, 1-9.

Pagram, J., Cooper, M., Jin, H., & Campbell, A. (2018). Tales from the exam room: Trialing an e-exam system for computer education and design and technology students. Education Sciences, 8(4), 188.

Renard, L., (2000). Cut and paste 101: Plagiarism and the net. Educ. Leadership: journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 57, 38-42.

Sutadji, E., Susilo, H., Wibawa, A. P., Jabari, N. A. M. & Rohmad, S. N. (2021). Adaptation Strategy of Authentic Assessment in Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1810, 12059.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index