ESL Students’ Attitude, Learning Problems, And Needs For Online Writing

Noriah Ismail, Supyan Hussin, Saadiyah Darus

Abstract


In many instances, negative attitudes towards writing as well as other language learning problems have been linked to ESL students’ poor performance in writing. The study investigates ESL tertiary students’ writing attitude and the learning problems they face in BEL 311 writing course at MARA University of Technology. The participants in the study were 60 Part Three Diploma students taking BEL 311 course, and 4 writing instructors who have been teaching this course for more than 5 years. The students were given a set of needs analysis questionnaires, and the lecturers were interviewed. In addition, both groups of participants were asked to describe the important elements which they perceive as useful for a supplementary online writing program. The results indicate that the lecturers felt the majority of the students have negative attitude towards writing as they would procrastinate. They are also careless and dislike writing.  The findings from the participants also revealed that they perceive writing in English as difficult and they dislike it. In addition, both groups of participants also perceive that the students’ learning problems, which affect their writing quality, include the lack of practice time being allocated in class, dull writing activities and the lack of emphasis towards critical thinking in their writing course. Furthermore, they suggested that a special online writing program which can act as a supplement for the course and help to enhance the learners’ writing ability and interest.


Keywords


ESL writing; needs analysis; attitudes; learning problems; online writing program

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bada, E. & Okan, Z. (2000). Students' language learning preferences. TESL-EJ, 4(3), 1-15. (Online) Retrieved 12 December 2011, from http://writing.berkeley.edu/TESLEJ/ej15/a1.html

Chuo, Tun-Whei I. (2007). The effects of the WebQuest writing instruction program on EFL learners writing performance, writing apprehension and perception. TESL-EJ .11(3), 1-27. (Online) Retrieved 24 October 2009, from http://tesl-ej.org/ej43/a3.pdf

Fang, Y. (2010). Perceptions of the computer-assisted writing program among EFL college learners. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 246-256.

Fellner, T. & Matthew, A. M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. JALT CALL Journal. 2(1), 15-26. (Online) Retrieved 18 March 2010, from http://www.jaltcall.org/journal/articles/2_1_Fellner.pdf

Gungle, B W. & Taylor, V. (1989). Writing apprehension and second language writers. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 235-248). New York: Longman.

Kaewpet, C. (2009). A framework for investigating learner needs: needs analysis extendedto curriculum development. Electronic Journal of Foreign language Teaching. 6(2), 209-220. (Online) Retrieved 20 February 2010, from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v6n22009/kaewpet.htm

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.

Mah Boon Yih & Er Ann Nah. (2009). Measuring students’ perception of writing web logs in ESL classroom employing the Technology Acceptance Model. Proceedings of Scientific and Social Research, UiTM, 12, 1-9.

Mc Leod, S. (1987). Some thoughts about feeling: The affective domain and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38, 426-435.

Ng Kui Choo. (2001). The case of comprehensible input in teaching and learning the write stuff. Proceedings of the FIFTH MELTA Biennial International Conference Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 5, 11-21.

Nor Aslah Adzmi. (2009). The academic English language needs of industrial design students in UiTM Kedah, Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 717-718.

Noriah Ismail, Sumarni Maulan & Nor Haniza Hassan. (2008). The impact of teacher feedback on ESL students’ writing performance. Jurnal Akademik UiTM Johor, 8(1), 45-54.

Noriah Ismail, Suhaidi Elias, Intan Safinas Mohd Ariff Albakri, P. Dhayapari Perumal & Indrani Muthusamy. (2010). Exploring ESL students’ apprehension level and attitude towards academic writing. The International Journal of Learning, 17(6), 475-783.

Posiah Mohd Isa, Siti Akmar Abu Samah, and Kamaruzaman Jusoff. (2008). Inculcating values and ethics in higher education e-learning drive: UiTM i-learn user policy. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology Conference, 452-455.

Rankin-Brown, M. (2006). Addressing writing apprehension in adult English language learners. Proceedings from CATESOL: CATESOL State Conference 2006, 1-7.

Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Saadiyah Darus. (2008). A framework for a computer-based essay marking system: Specifically developed for ESL writing. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Seedhouse, P. (1995). Needs analysis and the general English classroom. ELT Journal, 49/1, 59-65.

Siti Hamin Stapa & Ismi Roha Mohd Jais. (2005). A survey of writing needs and expectations of Hotel Management and Tourism students. English for Specific Purposes World Journal, 3(1), 55-69.

Supyan Hussin. (2008). Creating a bigger Z.P.D. for ESL learners via online forum. The College Teaching Methods and Styles Journal, 4(11), 1-9.

Tan, B.H., Emerson, L., & White, C. (2006). Reforming ESL writing instruction in tertiary education: The writing centre approach. The English Teacher, 25, 1-14.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wan Hurani Osman & Anna Lynn Abu Bakar. (2009). Learning to write an academic paper among medical students of university Malaysia Sabah. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2009) INTI University College, Malaysia, 2, 1-21

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An Overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.

Wilhelm, K. H. & Chen Pei, B. (2008). University teachers and students’ perceptions of ELT Methodologies and their effectiveness. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 79-102.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021