Theorising for Innovation: Implications for English Language Teacher Education

Ania Lian, Widya Hanum Sari Pertiwi


The paper begins by acknowledging the complexity of the challenges that the introduction of the new international curriculum standards has brought with it. It also acknowledges the role that these policies have played in opening a space for pedagogic research and innovation in teaching programs. The paper argues that while policies are necessary to support change, transformation of practice is an evolutionary process, necessitating critical engagement with the vision that informs new policies, often requiring academics to confront the discourses which support their current practices and analyse the tensions that this process of confrontation may reveal. In relation to English language teacher education, one tension that this study brought into focus is the problem of research innovation. The issue is important since there is research to indicate that stagnation begins early, as a consequence of research training and examination practices. The paper develops a strategy for addressing the problem of research innovation, especially at the level of undergraduate education, and argues that fostering innovation can be as easy as enabling students to explore problems, rather than looking for textbook-based solutions that encourage intellectual compliance. 



research methodology; CALL research; innovation in CALL; literature review; language teacher education

Full Text:



Ball, S, Maguire, M, Braun, A. & Hoskins, K, (2011). Policy Actors: Doing Policy Work in Schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Vol. 32(4), 625-639.

Biesta G., Allan J. & Edwards R. (Eds). (2014). Making a Difference in Theory: the Theory Question in Education and the Education Question in Theory. Routledge.

Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H. & Scales, B. (2008). Executive summary. Review of Australian higher education. Australian Government. Retrieved from:


Carr, W. (2006). Education without Theory. British Journal of Educational Studies. Vol. 54, 136-159.

Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) (2011). InTASC. Model Core Teaching Standards: a Resource for State Dialogue. CCSSO’s Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC). U.S.A.

Feuer, H. N., & Hornidge, A.-K. (2015). Higher Education Cooperation in Asean: Building Towards Integration or Manufacturing Consent? Comparative Education. Vol. 51(3), 327-352.

Freadman, A. (1987). Anyone for Tennis? In I. Reid (Ed.). The Place of Genre in Learning: Recent Debates (pp. 91-124). Deakin University, Geelong, Centre for Studies in Literary Education.

Government of Indonesia (2012). Presidential Decree No. 8 Year 2012 on Indonesian Qualifications Framework.

Hammersley (2004). Some Questions About Evidence-based Practice in Education. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.). Evidence-based Practice in Education. Open University Press.

Kell, P. & Vogl, G. (2012). International Students in the Asia Pacific: Mobility, Risks, and Global Optimism. New York: Springer.

Lian, A.B. (2008). International Students in the Asia Pacific: Mobility, Risks, and Global Optimismmaking Our Learning Environments Interactive: A Critique of the Concept of Interaction in Second Language Acquisition Studies. In M. Mantero (Ed.). ISLS Readings in Language Studies (Language Across Disciplinary Boundaries) (pp. 333-350). St. Louis, MO, USA: International Society for Language Studies Inc.

Lian, A.B., Bodnarchuk, A., Lian, A-P. & Napiza, C. (2017). Academic Writing as Aesthetics Applied: Creative Use of Technology to Support Multisensory Learning. In A.B. Lian, P. Kell, P. Black, P. & K. Y. Lie (Eds.). Challenges in Global Learning: International Contexts and Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishers, Cambridge.

Lian, A.B. (2017 under review). Differentiated Learning and Evidence From Neuroscience: Implications for Computer-assisted Language-learning (CALL) Pedagogies. Research and practice in Technology-

Enhanced Learning. Springer.

Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education (MORTHE) (2015). Decree No.44 Year 2015 on National Higher Education Standards. Jakarta.

P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved July 26, 2016 from:

Ramachandran, V. & Hirstein, W. (1999). The Science of Art: a Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies. Vol. 6(6-7), 15-51.

Rawolle, S. & Lingard, B. (2015). Bourdieu and Doing Policy Sociology in Education. In Gulson, K.N, Clarke, M, & Peterson, E. B. (Eds.). Education Policy and Contemporary Theory Implication for Research (pp. 15-26), New York: Routledge.

Rodliyah, R. S. (2016). Using a Facebook Closed Group to Improve EFL Students’ Writing. TEFLIN Journal. Vol. 27(1), 82-99.

Szkudlarek, T. (2014). The Excess of Theory: On the Functions of Educational Theory in Apparent Reality. In G. Biesta, J. Allan & R. Edwards (Eds.). Making a Difference in Theory: the Theory Question in Education and the Education Question in Theory. Routledge.

The ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). ASEAN socio-cultural community blueprint. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved October 16, 2016 from:

Thomas, G. (2007). Education and Theory: Strangers in Paradigms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Thomas, G. & Pring, R. (2004). Evidence-based Practice in Education. Open University Press.

Yang, Y., Wannaruk, A. & Lian, A.-P. (2017). (Forthcoming) Improving the English-speaking skills of Chinese primary EFL learners with a verbotonal approach. Rangsit Journal of Arts and Sciences. Vol. 7(2).



  • There are currently no refbacks.




eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021