MUET As A Predictor Of Academic Achievement In ESL Teacher Education

Juliana Othman, Abu Bakar Nordin

Abstract


One of the indicators of English language proficiency used by Malaysian public universities is the Malaysian University English Test (MUET). This study seeks to examine whether MUET is an accurate predictor of academic performance of a group of English teacher education students. The participants for this study consisted of 111 first and second year students who were enrolled in a B. Ed Teaching English as a Second Language (TESL) program at a local public university. A general linear multivariate regression was conducted using the SPSS for the overall score of the MUET together with their scores on each of the test components and the students CGPA (Cumulative Grade Point Average).  The analysis was carried out to identify important predictors of academic achievement by correlating each of the independent predictor variables with each other as well as with the academic achievement criterion. The results of the multiple regression analysis revealed that reading and listening components were significant predictors of students’ academic achievement. These findings seem to indicate that the different components of the MUET can be used to predict students’ academic performance more accurately than the overall MUET score itself. However, there is a need for continuing predictive validity studies in different contexts. Context specific studies are important as they provide empirical evidence and contribute to an increasing literature on the relevance of MUET in higher education settings.


Keywords


MUET; English language testing; predictor; academic achievement; correlation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Samad, A., Syed Abd Rahman, S.Z & Yahya, S.N. (2008). Refining English language tests for University entrance: A Malaysian example. Asian Journal of University Education. Vol 3(1), 57-71.

Ayers, J. B. & Peters, R. M. (1977). Predictive validity of the Test of English as a Foreign Language for Asian graduate students in engineering, chemistry, or mathematics. Educational and psychological Measurement. Vol 37(2), 461-463.

Cotton, F. & Conrow, F. (1998).An investigation of the predictive validity of IELTS amongst a group of international students studying at the University of Tasmania. EA Occasional Paper, 1, 72-115.

Criper, C. & Davies, A. (1988). ELTS validation project report: Research Report 1.The British Council/ University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.

Dooey, P. (1999). An investigation into the predictive validity of the IELTS Test as an indicator of future academic success. In K. Martin, N. Stanley and N. Davison (Eds.).Teaching in the Disciplines/ Learning in Context(pp. 114-118). Proceedings of the 8th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. The University of Western Australia, February 1999.

Dooey, P. & Oliver, R. (2002). An investigation into the predictive validity of the IELTS test. Prospect. Vol 17, 36-54.

Elder, C. (1993). Language proficiency as a predictor of performance in teacher education. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing. Vol 2, 68-85.

Graham, J. G. (1987). English language proficiency and the prediction of academic success. TESOL Quarterly. Vol 21(3), 505-521

Hill,K., Storch, N., & Lynch, B. (1999).A comparison of IELTS and TOEFL as predictors of academic success. In R. Tulloh (Ed.).IELTS Research Reports 2 (pp.53-63). Canberra: IELTS Australia.

Hirsch, D. (2007). English language, academic support and academic outcomes: A discussion paper. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL. Vol 2, 193-211.

Hu, Shu-Choan, P. (1991).English proficiency and academic

performance of international graduate students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(5), 1626A.(University Microfilms No. AAC 91-30788).

Kerstjens, M. & Nery, C. (2000). Predictive validity in the IELTS test: A study of the relationship between IELTS scores and students’ subsequent academic performance. IELTS Research Reports. Vol 3, 85-108.

Lee King Siong. (2004). Exploring the connection between the testing of reading and literacy: The case of the MUET. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies.Vol 4(1), 41-50.

Messick, S. (1998). Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.

Moon, T. S. &Siew, H. O. (2004). A study on the factors that impact on the academic performance of the computer science and the information technology students in University of Malaya. CMU Journal. Vol 3 (2), 169-184.

Neal, M. E. (1998).The predictive validity of the GRE and TOEFL exams with CGPA as the criterion of graduate success for international graduate students in science and Engineering. (ED424294).

Person, N. E. (2002). Assessment of TOEFL scores and ESL classes as criteria for admission to career & technical education and other selected Marshall University graduate programs. Presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the Association for Career and Technical Education.(ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED473756).

Ponniah, K. S. & Tay, B. (1992).Processing strategies in reading.In SuaraPendidik.Vol15 (4), 27-40.

Spitzer, T.M. (2001). Predictors of college success: A comparison of traditional and non-traditional age students. NASPA Journal.Vol38(1), 82-98.

Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured word: The development of objective language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stoynoff, S.J. (1991). English language proficiency and study strategies as determinants of academic success for international students in U.S. Universities. Dissertation Abstracts International 52 (0), 97A (University Microfilms No. AAC 91-06713).

Templer, B. (2004). High-stakes testing at high fees: Notes and queries on the international English proficiency assessment market. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies.Vol2(1), 1-8.

Weir, C. (1988).Communicative language testing.Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

Woodrow, L. (2006). Academic success of international postgraduate Education students and the role of English Proficiency.University of Sydney Papers in TESOL. Vol 1, 51-70.

Yen, D. & Kuzma, J. (2009) Higher IELTS Score, Higher Academic Performance? The Validity of IELTS in Predicting the Academic Performance of Chinese Students.Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching. Vol 3, 1-7.

Yule, G. & Hoffman, P. (1990).Predicting success of ITAs in a U.S. university. TESOL Quarterly. Vol 24(2), 227-243.

Zulkifli, M. N., Nur Azilah, I., Nuraini, K., Shahrum, A. & Mohd

Marzuki, M. (2011). MUET score and loading Hour: An analysis on the relationship towards academic performance Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol18, 103-109.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021