Politeness In E-mails Of Arab Students In Malaysia

Zena Moayad Najeeb, Marlyna Maros, Nor Fariza Mohd Nor

Abstract


This study analyzes the politeness strategies found in Arab postgraduate students’ e-mails to their supervisors during their period of study at Malaysian universities. Many studies have revealed that language ability, social adjustment and culture shock are the most challenging issues that are frequently encountered by the international students. Arab students who are studying in Malaysia, likewise, encounter challenges as they experience different cultures in their new environment, and in their efforts at learning English in an academic environment. Politeness tends to have various implications in cross-cultural communication. This research used quantitative and qualitative approaches to analyze eighteen e-mails that were sent by six Arab postgraduate students to their supervisors.  The politeness strategies were analyzed according to Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory, and the degrees of directness were categorized according to Cross Cultural Speech Act Realization Pattern (CCSARP) Blum-Kulka and Olshtain (1984) coding scheme. The findings show that Arab students used various politeness strategies, including the use of positive and negative politeness strategies. They tended to be more direct in their requests via e-mail when communicating in English. No student used the indirect strategy. This study provides an insight into the Arab students’ politeness strategies that would help to avoid misunderstanding, and misinterpretation of their e-mails, as well as to improve student’s pragmatic awareness in writing e-mails in English.


Keywords


e-mails, politeness strategies, directness of requests, culture, academic environment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Gheriani, A. (2009). Arab postgraduate students studying in Malaysia: The current situation and a mechanism to resolve obstacles. Proceedings of the International Workshop on The Management of International Students, International Islamic University Malaysia IIUM. Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Baron, N. S. (2003). Why e-mail looks like speech: Proofreading, pedagogy and public face. In J. Aitchison, & D. M. Lewis (Eds.), New media language (pp. 85-94). New York: Routledge.

Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 59-81.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: N.J. Ablex.

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5 (3), 196-214.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56- 311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chen, E. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to

authority figures. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 35-55.

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, B., & Brewer, J. (1997). Electronic discourse. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via e-mail and voice-mail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 500- 512.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing Press.

Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society, 5 (2), 137-151.

Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged performatives. In Cole, P & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 44-68). New York: Academic Press.

Flynn, N., & Flynn, T. (1998). Writing effective e-mail. Menlo Park: CA: Crisp

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Glater, J. D. (2006, February 21). To: Professor @University.edu subject: Why it’s all about me. The New York Times. (Online). Retrieved 2 March 2006, from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/21/education/21professors.html?pagewanted=all

Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., and Morgan, J. (Eds), Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard

University Press.

Gu, Yueguo. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14 (2), 237-257.

Hale, C., & Scanlon, J. (1999). Wired style: Principles of English usage in the digital age. New York: Broadway Books.

Hamilton, B. A. (2007). A field study about the reality of information and communication

technology in the Arab countries. Report issued by the World Economic Forum, the Swiss city of Davo (Online). Retrieved 2 March 2006, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/6293586/World-Economic-Forum-Annual-Report-20062007

Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. L. (2000). Global literacies and the world-wide web. London: Routledge.

Hazidi Haji Abdul Hamid. (2002). Similar words, different meanings: A natural semantic metalanguage exploration of cultural differences. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 2(1), 1-13.

Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information, Science and Technology, 36, 109-168.

Ide, S. (1993). Linguistic politeness, III: Linguistic politeness and universality. Multilingua, 12 (1), 223–248.

Keblawi, F. (2005). Demotivation among Arab learners of English. Proceedings of the Second International online conference on second and foreign language teaching and research, United States, 49-78. (Online) Retrieved 2 March 2006, from http://www.readingmatrix.com/conference/pp/proceedings2005/keblawi.pdf

Lakoff, R. (1973). The Logic of Politeness: or minding your P’s and Q’s. CLS, 9, 292- 305.

Lea, M. (1991). Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer- mediated communication. Behaviour & Information Technology, 10 (2), 153-172

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Essex: Longman.

Lim, Tae-Seop. (1994). Facework and interpersonal relationships. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues (pp. 209-222). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Locher, M. (2004). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton.

Mackey, D. (2005). Send me a message: A step-by-step approach to business and professional writing. New York: McGraw Hill.

Malley, S. B. (2006). Whose digital literacy it is, anyway? Essential Teacher, 3(2), 50-52.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21 (5), 451-468.

Nwoye, O. G. (1992). Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 18 (4), 309–328.

Olshtain, E. & Cohen, A. (1983). Apology: A speech act set. In N. Wolfson, & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 18-36). Rowley.MA: Newbury House.

Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Sproull, L., & Kiessler, S. (1986). Reducing social context clues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Takano, S. (2005) Re-examining linguistic power: strategic uses of directives by professional Japanese women in positions of authority and leadership. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(5), 633–666.

UNESCO. (2003). Literacy: a UNESCO Perspective (Online). Retrieved 2 March 2006, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001318/131817eo.pdf

Vilkki, L. (2006). Politeness, face and facework: Current issues. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 322-332.

Watts, T. J, & Ehlich, K. (1992). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, thoughts and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Watts, R. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Watts, R., & Ehilch, K. (2005) Politeness in language studies in its history: Theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021