Cognitive Precision and Expressiveness in Stock Market Communication: A Contrastive Perspective

Bozena Duda, Krzysztof Nycz

Abstract


Nowadays, economic issues make up a significant part of everyday communication. Daily business news on television and in digital sources, constant contacts with financial institutions – to name a few – only emphasize the omnipresence of the economy in our lives and at the same time confirm that we are inescapably involved in economic processes. The subject matter of the paper is a specific area of business communication, namely stock market communication. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) by Lakoff and Johnson (2003) and the model of schematicity hierarchies of metaphorical concepts by Kövecses (2019), as well as Littlemore’s (2015) and Brdar’s (2019) findings on the functions and regularity of metonymic patterns, we aim to investigate the nature and functions of metonymies and metaphors found to be reflected in stock market communication. Another objective is to present precision and expressiveness in stock market communication achieved through the use of figurative (metaphorical and metonymic) means. In particular, we conducted a qualitative analysis of selected metonymic and metaphorical expressions in three different languages (English, German and Polish) extracted from stock market reports and commentaries. The choice of the contrastive perspective results from Weinrich’s (1976) assumption that languages belonging to the western cultural community should share patterns of conceptualizations. The findings of the analysis conducted seem to show that image schemata and domain levels overlap to a great extent in the three languages under analysis, and cultural variation and differences – if present – occur at the more specific level of frames and/or mental spaces.


Keywords


conceptual metaphor; metonymy; stock market communication; qualitative analysis; contrastive perspective

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bąk, P. (2019). Zur Metapher der Metasprache aus translationswissenschaftlicher Sicht am Beispiel der „Geschichte der neueren Sprachwissenschaft“ von Gerhard Helbig. Beiträge zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. 8, 29-56. http://beitraege-contributions.pl/articles/08/02_bak.pdf

Brdar, M. (2019). On the regularity of metonymy across languages (exemplified on some metonymies in medical discourse). Explorations in English

Language and Linguistics. Vol. 7.1, 52-69. http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=4f76030c-9e2b-45fe-943e-e25909c805b3%40sdc-v-sessmgr02

Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. (1 edition.). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Hart, C. (2017). Metaphor and Intertextuality in Media Framings of the (1984-1985) British Miners’ Strike: A Multimodal Analysis. Discourse and

Communication. Vol. 11(1), 3-30. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1750481316683291

Jelinek, E. (2015). The Merchant’s Contracts. London: Seagull Books.

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

Konieczna, E. (2020). Verticality As an Experiential Basis for Non-spatial Relationships in English and Polish: The Principled Polysemy Model. Rzeszów:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.

Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2), 321-347. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cog-2016-0052/html

Kövecses, Z. (2018). The power (and problem) of money. Society and Economy. Vol. 40 (2018) 3, 365-375.

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=ae951d98-6a91-4c11-91f3-738c8ed107eb%40sessionmgr102

Kövecses, Z. (2019). Idioms of money – in a new light. In B. Duda & R. Kiełtyka & E. Konieczna (Eds.), Culture, Cognition, Discourse and Grammar.

Cognitive Considerations of Formulaic Language (pp. 21-32). Berlin/New York: Peter Lang Verlag.

Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. (2 edition). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lonczak, P. (2010). Mit zielonej wyspy. bankier.pl, https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Mit-zielonej-wyspy-2199555.html (accessed on 07.05.2021)

McAleese, D. (2007). Miracle of the Celtic Tiger. Learning from Ireland’s Success. Toronto Regional Group,

https://web.archive.org/web/20070623164942/http://ipac.ca/toronto/news_highlights/fall2001/celtic.htm (accessed on 07.05.2021)

Murphy, A. E. (2000). The ‘Celtic Tiger’ – An Analysis of Ireland’s Economic Growth Performance. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, RSC

/16, https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/00_16.pdf (accessed on 07.05.2021)

Nycz, K. (2013). Między fachowością a ekspresją językową. O niektórych swoistych cechach komunikacji giełdowej. Lingwistyka stosowana 8, 103-116.

http://docplayer.pl/113785567-Lingwistyka-stosowana.html

Nycz, K. (2017). Informationsstrukturierung in Wirtschaftstexten. Berlin/New York: Peter Lang Verlag.

Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. March 2021. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com (accessed on 13.04.2021)

Prażmo, E.M. & Augustyn, R. (2020). Parasites, Herbivores and Dried Fish: Dehumanising Metaphorical Blends in Japanese. GEMA Online® Journal of

Language Studies 20(2), 148-167. https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/37749/10509

Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 17-59).

Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Silvestre-López, A.-J. (2020). Conceptual Metaphor in Meditation Discourse: An Analysis of the Spiritual Perspective. GEMA Online® Journal of Language

Studies 20(1), 35-53. https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/33860/10244

Spinnen, B. (2008). Gut aufgestellt. Kleiner Phrasenführer durch die Wirtschftssprache. Freiburg: Herder.

Weinrich, H. (1976). Sprache in Texten. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2204-01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021