Penanda Pengemukaan Topik dalam Wacana Pedagogi: Satu Analisis Wacana Kritis (Topic Delivery Markers in Pedagogical: Discourse based on Critical Discourse Analysis)

Neng Lia Marliana, Mohammad Fadzeli Jaafar, Harishon Binti Radzi

Abstract


Kebanyakan kajian lepas wacana pedagogi mengenai kemahiran mengajar guru tidak membincangkan praktis sosial wacana berdasarkan pendekatan Analisis Wacana Kritis (AWK). Kajian ini bertujuan menjelaskan praktis sosial wacana pedagogi melalui huraian penanda pengemukaan topik dalam interaksi guru-murid semasa aktiviti pengajaran mikro dan interpretasi amalan wacananya. Penanda pengemukaan topik merangkumi perkataan penanda paraton sebagai penanda wacana dan ayat tanya guru sebagai bahagian kawalan topik dalam dimensi tekstual wacana pedagogi. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah rakaman dan transkripsi data. Data diambil melalui video rakaman selama 30 minit setiap sesi pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) semasa aktiviti pengajaran mikro melibatkan 5 pelajar bakal guru di sebuah universiti awam di Jakarta dan murid sebenar dari 5 sekolah menengah di Jakarta. Kajian ini mengaplikasi AWK Fairclough (2013). Fokus analisis pada perkataan penanda paraton dan jenis ayat tanya guru. Hasil kajian ini mendapati guru menggunakan 146 perkataan penanda paraton ‘nah’, ‘ya’, ‘baik/baiklah’, ‘silakan’, ‘sekarang’, ‘lalu’, ‘anak-anak/anak-anakku’, ‘Assalamualaikum/selamat pagi/sore’, ‘selanjutnya’, ‘coba’, ‘yang pertama/kedua/ketiga’, ‘Alhamdulillah’, ‘bagaimana’, ‘wah’, ‘jadi’, ‘ayo’, ‘kalian’, ‘ohya nak’, dan ‘tolong’ pada awal gerakan sebagai cara pengemukaan topik baharu. Manakala terdapat 125 soalan guru menjadi gerakan sebagai penanda topik dan selepas perkataan penanda paraton diujarkan. Jenis ayat tanya guru berupa ayat tanya terbuka-tertutup; ayat tanya informatif-konfirmatif. Disimpulkan, kajian ini mengandungi praktis sosial kesetaraan dominasi guru-murid di bilik darjah. Guru menganggap murid sebagai subjek yang mempunyai hak untuk dihormati melalui pemilihan perkataan penanda paraton yang menunjukkan kesantunan, seperti ‘silakan’, ‘tolong’, ‘coba’, partikel ‘kah’, serta perakuan positif terhadap respons murid. Perkara ini bertentangan dengan praktis sosiobudaya pedagogi di Indonesia bahawa kuasa sering dimiliki oleh guru. Selain itu, guru dalam kajian ini masih merupakan bakal guru sehingga murid menganggap mempunyai hubungan rapat dengan gurunya. Kajian ini menyumbang kepada kualiti PdP apabila pelajar menjadi guru serta memberi input linguistik dalam kajian wacana pedagogi dengan pendekatan AWK.

 

Kata kunci: analisis wacana kritis, ayat tanya guru; penanda pengemukaan topik; perkataan penanda paraton: wacana pedagogi

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

Most past studies of pedagogical discourse on teacher teaching skills do not discuss the social practice of discourse based on the critical discourse analysis approach (AWK). The study aims to clarify the social practice of pedagogical discourse through the analysis of the markers of the delivery of topics in the interaction of teacher-students during micro-teaching activities. The topic delivery markers include paratone marker words as a marker of discourse and a teacher's question verses as a part of the topic control in the textual dimension of the pedagogical discourse. The study used data recording and transcription methods. The data were taken from a 30-minute video recording of each teaching and learning session during a micro-teaching activity involving 5 prospective teachers at a public university in Jakarta and real students from five secondary schools in Jakarta. This study applies to AWK Fairclough (2013). The analysis focuses on the paratone marker words and type of teacher question verse. This study found that teachers used 146 words of paratone markers ‘nah’, ‘ya’, ‘baik/baiklah’, ‘silakan’, ‘sekarang’, ‘lalu’, ‘anak-anak/anak-anakku’, ‘assalamualaikum/selamat pagi/sore’, ‘selanjutnya’, ‘coba’, ‘yang pertama/kedua/ketiga’, ‘Alhamdulillah’, ‘bagaimana’, ‘wah’, ‘jadi’, ‘ayo’, ‘kalian’, ‘ohya nak’, and ‘tolong’ at the beginning of the movement as a way of summing up new topics. There are 125 questions of teachers becoming movements either as topic markers or after the paratone marker words are approved. The type of teacher's question verse is an open-closed; and informative-affirmative question verse. This study contains the social practice of equality of teacher-students dominance in the classroom. Teachers consider students to be subjects who have the right to be respected through the selection of paratone marker words that indicate an effect, such as 'please', 'please', 'try', and '–kah' particle as well as a positive an acknowledgment of the student’s response. This is contrary to the sociocultural practice of pedagogy in Indonesia where power often belongs to teachers. In addition, the teacher in this study is still a prospective teacher so the students consider having a close relationship with their teacher. This study contributes to the quality of teaching and learning when students become teachers as well as providing linguistics input in the study of pedagogical discourse with the AWK approach.

 

Keywords: critical discourse analysis; teacher's questions verse: topic delivery markers; paratone marker words; pedagogical discourse


Keywords


critical discourse analysis; teacher's questions verse: topic delivery markers; paratone marker words; pedagogical discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Chaer. (2015). Sintaksis Bahasa Indonesia: Pendekatan Proses. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Al-Zahrani, Mona Yousef, & Abdullah Al-Bargi. (2017). The Impact of Teacher Questioning on Creating Interaction in EFL: A Discourse Analysis. English Language Teaching. 10(6), 135-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p135.

Arida Rusmayanti, Arju Muti'ah, & Furoidatul Husniah. (2017). Penerapan keterampilan bertanya dan memberikan penguatan dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia kelas VII SMP Negeri 4 Jember. Lingua Franca, 2(2), 510-518.

Asmah Haji Omar. (2021). Bahasa dan Alam Pemikiran Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Asrianti. (2019). Representasi kekuasaan dalam wacana kelas di sekolah menengah pertama. Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7384.

Barmawi, & M. Arifin. (2016). Micro Teaching (Praktik Pengajaran yang Efektif dan Kreatif). Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Biria, R., & Mohammadi, A. (2012). The Sociopragmatic functions of inaugural speech: a critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1290–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013.

Brown, G., & George Yule. (1998). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, J., & Larsen. (2017). Discourse markers in the classroom. JALT2016 Transformation in Language Education. Japan Association for Language Teaching. November 25-28, 2016. Nagoya, Japan.

Creswell, John W. (2018). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.

Elmy Fadilah Nur. (2019). Analyzing students’ discourse markers ability in secondary school. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LkiS.

Ezura Nasir, & Zamri Mahamod. (2020). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam kalangan guru bahasa di sebuah Sekolah Aliran Agama. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences 19(1), 1-25.

Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. (2006). Language and Globalization. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Longman.

Faiz Sathi Abdullah, & Kobra Hosseini. (2012). Discursive enactment of power in Iranian High School EFL classroom. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(2), Special Section, May 2012, 375-392.

Febrian, & Puji Astuti. (2019). Classroom Mathematical Questioning Skill (CMQS) Mahamurid Praktikan Micro Teaching. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 7(2), 111-119. http://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v7i2.7252

Hafidzoh Sirri Sajani. (2014). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam komunikasi tulisan: analisis kajian Guru-Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Rendah Park View (Singapura). PhD diss., (BA)--Jabatan Bahasa Melayu, Akademi Pengajian Melayu, Universiti Malaya, 2013/2014.

Hasibuan, & Moedjiono. (2010). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Penerbit Rosda Karya.

Idris Aman. (2002). Dominasi guru dalam wacana bilik darjah Kurikulum Bersepadu di Malaysia: satu analisis wacana kritis. Kertas Kerja Persidangan Antarabangsa Bahasa, Sastera, dan Kebudayaan Melayu ke-2, Singapore, 1-3.

Ika Lusi Kristanti. (2018). Students’ Paratone in New Discourse. Lecturer Repository. STKIP PGRI Jombang. https://scholar.google.com/

Jenks, Christopher J. (2020). Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Classroom. Classroom Discourse, 11(2), 2020, 99-106. http://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.

Kadooka, Ken Ichi. (2018). Paratone as a discourse markers. Estudos Linguísticos/Linguistic Studies, 2, Edições Colibri/CLUNL, Lisboa, 2008, 27-40.

Mariam L. M. Pandean. (2018). Kalimat tanya dalam bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Linguistik, 5(3). 75-88. https://doi.org/10.35796/kaling.5.3.2018.25030

Nguyen Thi Thuy Loan. (2019). A case study of teacher feedback on Thai University students’ essay writing. GEMA Online-Journal of Language Studies, 19(2), 121-138. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1902-08.

Nik Safiah K., Farid M. O., Hashim Haji M., & Abd Hamid M. (2015). Tatabahasa Dewan Edisi Ketiga. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

N.L. Marliana, & Suhertuti. (2018). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Rosdakarya.

Norhayati Alias. (2019). Analisis penanda wacana pernyataan semula bahasa Melayu iaitu dan bahasa Sepanyol esto es. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 363-378. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-19.

Pusat Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Indonesia, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi V (Dalam Jaringan). https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/

Shanmugavelu, G., & Khairi Bin Ariffin. (2020). Questioning techniques and teachers’ role in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3260.

Sofiah Mohamed, Kamarul Azmi Jasmi, & Muhammad Azhar Zailaini. (2015). Akhlak guru dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam. Akademika, 86(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2016-8602-02.

Taylor, L. A., Vlach, S. K., & Mosley Wetzel, M. (2018). Observing, resisting, and problem posing language and power: possibilities for small stories in in-service teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 46, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.006.

Tsui, Bik-may Amy. (2008). Classroom discourse: approaches and perspectives. https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/226567433, 1-14.

Wilhelm, K. H., & Pei, Betty Chen. (2008). University teachers’ and students’ perceptions of ELT methodologies and their effectiveness. GEMA Online-Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 79-102.

Zhang, L., & Donglan Zhang. (2020). Dialoc discussion as a platform for construction knowledge: student-teachers interaction pattern and strategies in learning to teach English. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(22). 1-31. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-86892/v1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2302-05

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021