Linguistic Cues of Deception in Malaysian Online Investment Scams’ Promotional Materials
Abstract
The entire world has transitioned to a borderless information flow in this high-technology era, making communication more effective at the ease of the fingertips. However, these advantages come with various cybercrimes that can easily mislead readers and win them over to their point of view, including online investment scams. This quantitative study aims to analyse the linguistic cues of deception of investment scams’ promotional materials using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software. The data was gleaned from official website pages of investment scams provided by the Royal Malaysia Police (RMP), Central Bank of Malaysia (CBM), Financial Consumer Alert List (FCA), and the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC). Descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted. The findings of the descriptive analysis show that the highest linguistic cue used in the online investment scam is Lifestyle. For Pearson correlation analysis, the findings show that linguistic cue for Perception significantly correlates with other linguistic cues such as Lifestyle, Social Process, Cognition, and Affect. This indicates that the linguistic cues used in online investment scams are related. The findings of the study can be used as a guide to prevent online investment scam problems in the future.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Addawood, A., Badawy, A., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2019). Linguistic Cues to Deception: Identifying Political Trolls on Social Media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13(01), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3205
Adha, A. (2020). Linguistic Based Cues in Detecting Deception in Indonesian Language Use. Argumentum (1787-3606), (16). https://doi.org/10.34103/argumentum/2020/2
Boyd, R. L., Ashokkumar, A., Seraj, S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2022). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app
Bukit Aman says investment fraud cases surged in 2021, losses exceed RM420m. (2022, January 5). Malay Mail. Retrieved from https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2022/01/05/bukit-aman-says-investment-fraud-cases-surged-in-2021-losses-exceed-rm420m/2033251
Central Bank of Malaysia (2023). Retrieved from https://www.bnm.gov.my//financial-consumer-alert-list
Choudhury, F. (2014). Can language be useful in detecting deception? The linguistic markers of deception in the Jodi Arias interview.„. Journal of Undergraduate Research, 7(2), 78-92.
Connell, C. (2012). Linguistic Cues to Deception (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech). Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/32465
Deora, R. S., & Chudasama, D. (2021). Brief study of cybercrime on the internet. Journal of communication engineering & Systems, 11(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.37591/JoCES
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Frankel, T. (2012). The Ponzi scheme puzzle: A history and analysis of con artists and victims. Oxford University Press.
Fuller, C. M., Biros, D. P., & Wilson, R. L. (2009). Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 695-703.
Genao, D. R. (2021). Identification of Fraudulent Financial Statements: The Detection of Deception and Collusion in Earnings Calls (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation https://www.proquest.com/docview/2551555139?pqorigsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
John, S. (2018, September 18). CNBC. Retrieved from Religious-based financial fraud is rampant. Here’s how to fight it: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/06/religious-based-financial-fraud-is-rampant-heres-how-to-fight-it.html
Karim, N. A., Ab Wahid, Z., Ariffin, S. N. K., Nor, S. H. S., Nazlan, A. N., & Kassim, S. (2023). Financial Literacy among University Students and its Implications towards Financial Scams. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3 (I)), 124-128.
Levitan, S. I., Maredia, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2018, June). Linguistic cues to deception and perceived deception in interview dialogues. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) (pp.
-1950).
Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Lee, M., & Yang, S.-B. (2020). Unveiling the cloak of deviance: Linguistic cues for psychological processes in fake online reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102468
Mihalcea, R., & Strapparava, C. (2009, August). The lie detector: Explorations in the automatic recognition of deceptive language. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 conference short papers (pp. 309-312).
Mohd Padil, H., Kasim, E. S., Muda, S., Ismail, N., & Md Zin, N. (2021). Financial literacy and awareness of investment scams among university students. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-01-2021-0012
Naksawat, C., Akkakoson, S., & Loi, C. K. (2016). Persuasion strategies: use of negative forces in scam e-mails. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(1), 1-17.
New Straits Times. (2022, August 4). RM5.2b in losses through online scams since 2020. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2022/08/819331/rm52b-losses-through-online-scams-2020
Newman M. L., Pennebaker J. W., Berry D. S., Richards J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1296.
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015.
Rahman, A. A., Azmi, R., & Mohd Yusof, R. (2020). Get-Rich Quick scheme: Malaysian current legal development. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(1), 49-59.
Rubin, V. L., & Conroy, N. J. (2011). Challenges in automated deception detection in computer‐mediated communication. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-4.
Schillermann, M. K. (2018). Early detection and prevention of corporate financial fraud (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Securities Commission Malaysia (2020). Annual Report 2020. Retrieved October 19, 2023, from https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=e1c7eb21-53db-4f02-a8f8-55dc09f9fff
Shaari, A. H., Kamaluddin, M. R., Fauzi, W. F. P., & Mohd, M. (2019). Online-dating romance scam in Malaysia: An analysis of online conversations between scammers and victims. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 97-115
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010, February). Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 5-8). https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.171892
Van Der Zee, S., Poppe, R., Havrileck, A., & Baillon, A. (2020). A Personal Model of Trumpery: Linguistic Deception Detection in a Real-World High-Stakes Setting. Psychological Science, 33(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211015941
Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2020). A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(5), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395046
Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2008). Following linguistic footprints: Automatic deception detection in online communication. Communications of the ACM, 51(9), 119-122.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2304-09
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021