Reader-Text Transaction In Text Comprehension

Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan, Mak Kem Seng, Ooi Ae Kee

Abstract


The complexities and dynamics of reader-text transaction have become important issues in the teaching of reading comprehension. This study examines how tertiary level readers engage internal dialog with the text. It also seeks to provide the much needed insight of it onto the aspects of text comprehension processes. The aim of this study is to explore and provide descriptive analyses pertaining to the issues of questioning the text in invoking active interactions with the text. A total of 62 students pursuing semi-professional courses at diploma levels in one of the premier institutions of higher learning participated in this study. Qualitative data was obtained  through students’ written reports of the adapted verbalisation of thoughts of self-generated questions, semi-structured interviews with the students and field notes extracted from the researchers as participant observers. Thematic analysis was then used to identify emergent themes grounded in the data.  The findings indicate that readers are able to take ownership of the text when they engage inner dialog through active interaction with the text, and gain better understanding of the text. This article will argue that readers are transformed from passive to active participants if they are able to activate thinking skills through reader-text transaction in the form of questioning the text. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on developing reader-text transaction towards the use of thinking skills in text comprehension.  Such reader-text interactions will enable readers to take control of purposeful learning with far reaching results in text comprehension.


Keywords


reader-text transactions, lower order thinking skills (LOTs), higher order thinking skills (HOTs), literal, interpretive and applied thinkers.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvermann, D. E., & Phelps. S. F. (2002). Content reading and literacy. Succeeding in

today’s diverse classrooms. (3rd Ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.

Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Toronto: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Ball, A., & Washburn, S. (2001). Teaching students to think: practical applications of Bloom's taxonomy. Agricultural Educational Magazine, 74, 16–17.

Beyer, B. K. (1997). Improving students thinking. A comprehensive approach. Boston:

Allyn and Bacon.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thematic analysis and code development. Thousands Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Brozo, W. G., & Simpson, M. L. (1995). Readers, teachers, learners: Expanding literacy in secondary schools. New Jersey: Prentice Hills.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research. Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd.

Hajibah Osman. (2004). Genre based instructions for ESP. The English Teacher. XXXIII, 13-29.

Herber, H. L. (1978). Teaching reading in content areas. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc.

Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). The components of reading. In G. B. Thompson, W. E. Tunmer, & T. Nicholson (Eds.). Reading acquisition processes (pp. 1-17). England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Jariah Mohd Jan & Rosli Talif. (2005). Questioning strategies and the construction of context in classroom talk. The English Teacher, XXXIV, 76-89.

Manzo, A. V., Manzo. U. C., & Estes, T. H. (2001). Content area literacy: Interactive teaching for active learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Massey, D. (2003). A comprehension checklist: What if it doesn’t make sense? The Reading Teacher, 57(1), 81-84.

Moore, L., & Rudd, R. (2002). Using Socratic questioning in the classroom. Agricultural Educational Magazine, 75(3), 24-25.

Noorizah Mohd. Noor (2006). Reading academic text: Awareness and experiences among

university ESL learners. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 6(2), 65-78.

Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question-answer relationship. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-520.

Rossow, A. (2001). Engaging students in meaningful reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(6), 150-170.

Ruddell, M. R. (2001). Teaching content reading and writing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Savage, L. B. (1998). Eliciting critical thinking skills through questioning. Clearing House, 71(5), 291-293.

Sengupta, S. (2002). Developing academic reading at tertiary level: A longitudinal study tracing conceptual change. The Reading Matrix, 2(1), 1-37.

Wilhelm, K. H., & Betty, C. P. (2008). University teachers’ and students’ perception of ELT methodologies. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 79-102.

Wood, J. M. (2007). Understanding and computing Cohen’s Kappa: A tutorial. WebPsychEmpirist. (Online) Retrieved Nov 7, 2008 from http://wpe.info/vault/wood07/Wood07.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021