Stance Nouns in Argumentative Essays by L2 Malaysian Undergraduates

Hui Lin Teh, Geok Imm Lee, Vahid Nimehchisalem, Ain Nadzimah Abdullah

Abstract


Stance nouns are an important feature of academic writing since they indicate to the readers how writer’s stance and the arguments are to be interpreted. However, there is a lack of studies in investigating how the L2 undergraduate students use stance nouns in L2 argumentative writing. With the aim to gain more insights into patterns of use of stance nouns in L2 academic writing, this study employed summative content analysis to analyse the patterns of stance nouns in 100 argumentative essays by the L2 first-year undergraduate students in a private university in Malaysia. Based on the classification of stance nouns model by Jiang and Hyland (2015), the frequencies of the three types of stance nouns (entity, attribute and relation) were identified to determine the patterns of use of the stance nouns. The findings show that L2 students used more manner nouns and status nouns (attribute type), and event nouns (entity type) that reflected more epistemic evaluations and evidence-based reasonings in their stance. The classification of stance nouns indicates how writers use them to express stance and influence how readers interpret the arguments presented. In conclusion, different variants of stance nouns can help writers to strengthen their arguments in argumentative writing. This may inform the development in corpus-based teaching materials as the findings on patterns of use of stance nouns can be used as examples in the teaching and learning of argumentative writing.

 


Keywords


Academic writing; Argumentative essay; L2 writing; Stance; Stance noun

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9.) [Computer Software]. Waseda University, Japan. http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/

Azar, A. S., Hassaram, P., Mohd Farook, F. I., & Romli, N. H. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Stance Features in Research Article Introductions: Malaysian and English Authors. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(2). http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2202-14

Azmar, K., & Razali, A. B. (2024). Teaching and Learning English Academic Writing in Malaysian Tertiary Context. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 49-56. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2024.120301

Barbara, S. W. Y., Afzaal, M., & Aldayel, H. S. (2024). A Corpus-based Comparison of Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in the Academic Writing of Novice and Advanced Engineering Learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02757-

Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D. (2006). Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education Ltd.

Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Chikara, T. O., Landa, N., & Madoda, C. (2023). Stance in the Academic Writing of Zimbabwean Students Using English as a Second Language. Journal of Linguistics & Language in Education, 17(1). https://journals.udsm.ac.tz/index.php/jlle/article/view/6323

Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & North, S. (2012). Arguing as an Academic Purpose: The Role of Asynchronous Conferencing in Supporting Argumentative Dialogue in School and University. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.005

Diessel, Holger. (1999). Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signaling Nouns in Discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00017-0

Gray, B., & Cortes, V. (2011). Perception vs. Evidence: An Analysis of This and These in Academic Prose. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English, English Language Series. London: Longman.

Hirvela, A. (2017). Argumentation & Second Language Writing: Are We Missing the Boat? Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.002

Hsieh H. F. & Shannon, S., E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9):1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse studies, 7(2), 173-192.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre Pedagogy: Language, Literacy and L2 Writing Instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005

Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and Certainty in L1 and L2 Students' Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 205-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3

International English Language Testing System (IELTS). (2024). Understanding Your Score. IELTS. https://ielts.org/take-a-test/preparation-resources/understanding-your-score

Işık-Taş, E. E. (2018). Nominal Stance Construction in IELTS Tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.004

Jeong, W. (2022). The Effects of Certain Linguistic Features and Genre of Test Prompt as Predictors of College Writing Placement for L2 Students (Order No. 29326582). Retrieved 19th October 2022 from ProQuest One Academic. (2724219391). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/effects-

certain-linguistic-features-genre-test/docview/2724219391/se-2

Jiang, F. K. (2015). Nominal Stance Construction in L1 and L2 Students' Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.002

Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2015). 'The fact that': Stance Nouns in Disciplinary Writing. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 529-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590719

Jin, H. (2019). On the Anaphoric Use of Demonstratives This/These in L2 Academic Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.002

Kirmizi, O. & Kirmizi, G. D. (2022). Nominal Stance in Cross-disciplinary Academic Writing of L1 and L2 Speakers in Noun + that Constructions. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12252

Lee, J. J., Tytko, T., & Larkin, R. (2021). (Un)attended This/These in Undergraduate Student Writing: A Corpus Analysis of High- and Low-rated L2 Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100967

Maamuujav, U., Olson, C. B., & Chung, H. (2021). Syntactic and Lexical Features of Adolescent L2 Students’ Academic Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100822

Parnabas, J., Areff, A., Baharom, H., Kartar Singh, H., & Yusop, Y. (2022). Strength and Challenges Faced by the Pre-university Students in Extended Writing in Malaysian University English Test (MUET). International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 4(3), 140-154.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/19927

Qin, J. & Karabacak, E. (2010). The Analysis of Toulmin Elements in Chinese EFL University Argumentative Writing. System, 38(3), 444 - 456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012.

Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2012). The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing (6th ed.). London: Longman.

Schmid, H. (2000). English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Tung, S. A., Afnizul, A. N., Azizan, M., & Omar, S. K. (2024). Exploring Writing Difficulties in the Composing Process: A Case Study of ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 2428-2449.

https://ijarped.com/index.php/journal/article/view/744/718

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1994). Some Characteristics and Functions of Grammatical Subjects in Scientific Discourse. Written communication, 11(4), 534-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088394011004004

Wu, B., & Paltridge, B. (2021). Stance Expressions in Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison of Chinese Students’ MA Dissertations and PhD Theses. Lingua, 253, 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071

Yasuda, S. (2023). What Does it Mean to Construct an Argument in Academic Writing? A Synthesis of English for General Academic Purposes and English for Specific Academic Perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 66, 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101307




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2025-2503-11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021