Typomorfology of building mass and lingkage in Malioboro, Yogyakarta

Indah Pujiyanti, Norainah Abdul Rahman

Abstract


The Malioboro area of Yogyakarta is one of the main tourist destinations in Yogyakarta, which has the potential for the rapid development of regional structural patterns. Its strategic location in the city center and the presence of historic buildings and first-class shopping centers in the area attract tourists and investors to build in the Malioboro area. On the other hand, Malioboro Street is the philosophical axis of Yogyakarta City which has also been designated as a Cultural Conservation Area. The pattern of regional structure development based on building mass and linkage in this area is the focus of this research. Changes in the Typology of this area were analyzed using a comparative method by comparing data on patterns of building mass and linkage from different 4-year periods. This study aims to find out how the pattern of changes in the typology of buildings in the Malioboro area and its influence on the role of the Malioboro area as a cultural heritage area. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Typology of building mass and form changes in the Malioboro area there are five types, namely the gradual addition of building mass, the sudden addition, the reduction in building mass (total loss) and the change in the shape of the building without changing the building mass. Meanwhile, from the linkage typology, there is no change in the road network pattern from the 4 study year periods. Changes in building typology in the Malioboro area tend to be close to the Beringharjo market, while there is no change in building typology for the Agung building. However, near another historical building, namely the Vredeburg fort, there are indications of an additional building mass on the east side of the building. Its also that changes in the typology of buildings in this area are influenced by the location of the building on the road class .This needs to be considered so that policy references or directions can be given to control developments in cultural heritage areas.

 

Keywords: Building mass, linkage, malioboro, typology, transformation, urban


Keywords


Building mass; linkage; malioboro; typology; transformation; urban

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dahal, K. R., Benner, S., & Lindquist, E. (2017). Urban hypotheses and spatiotemporal characterization of urban growth in the Treasure Valley of Idaho, USA. Applied Geography, 79, 11-25.

Google Earth Pro. (2021). Citra Satelit (online). Retrieved from https://www.google.com/earth/

Hadiyanta, E. (2015). Kawasan cagar budaya Di Yogyakarta: Citra, Identitas, dan branding ruang. Jurnal Widya Prabha, 4(4), 3-23.

Iswati, T. Y. (2003). Tipologi-tipologi morfologi ruang dalam rumah-rumah di Kampung Kudusan Kota Gede. Jurnal Arsitektur Komposisi, 1(2), 123-134.

James, P., & Bound, D. (2009). Urban morphology types and open space distribution in urban core areas. Urban Ecosystems, 12(4), 417-424.

Kojongian, J. O., Rondonuwu, D. M., & Tungka, A. E. (2017). Karakteristik kawasan Kota Lama Manado dengan pendekatan Teori Hamid Shirvani. SPASIAL, 4(2), 73-82.

Kumalah, M. J., Saat, G., Mapjabil, J., Hussin, R., Afrizal, T., & Talip, M. A. (2015). Kearifan tempatan dan potensinya sebagai tarikan pelancongan berasaskan komuniti: Kajian kes komuniti Bajau Ubian di Pulau Mantanani, Sabah. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(12), 112-128.

Mahat, H., & Idrus, S. (2016). Education for sustainable development in Malaysia: A study of teacher and student awareness. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(6), 77-88.

Moudon, V. (1994). Getting to know the built landscape: Typomorphology. In Franck, K.A., Franck, K.A., Schneekloth, L.H. (Eds), Ordering Space: Types in Architecture and Design (pp. 289–314). Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA.

Nurfansyah, N. (2016). Tipologi kawasan Jalan Pageran Antasari Banjarmasin. INFO-TEKNIK, 13(1), 50-56.

Nurjannah, I., & Dahrma, I. K. A. (2019). Tipologi ruang terbuka publik pada kawasan permukiman nelayan Desa Bajo Indah. Jurnal Malige Arsitektur (Media Arsitektur Lintas Generasi), 1(1), 8.

Putri, M. A., Rahayu, M. J., & Putri, R. A. (2017). Bentuk morfologi kawasan permukiman urban fringe Selatan Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 4(2), 120-128.

Ramadanta, A. (2010). Kajian tipologi dalam pembentukan karakter visual dan struktur kawasan (Studi kasus: Kawasan Ijen, Malang). SMARTek, 8(2).

Risdian, H., Sari, S. R., & Rukayah, R. S. (2020). Elemen perancangan kota yang berpengaruh terhadap kualitas ruang kota pada Jalan Jendral Sudirman Kota Salatiga. MODUL, 20(01), 10-17.

Roger, T. (1986). Finding lost space. Theories of urban design. Wiley.

Santoso, I., & Wulandanu, B. G. (2011). Studi pengamatan tipologi bangunan pada kawasan Kauffman Kota Malang. Local Wisdom, 3(2), 10-26.

Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif.

Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Sulistijowati, M. (1991). Tipologi arsitektur pada rumah kolonial Surabaya (dengan kasus perumahan plampitan dan sekitarnya). Tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Pusat Penelitian Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November.

Widyatmika, I. K. A., Wiriantari, F., & Arjana, B. M. (2017). Karakteristik elemen perancangan kota di jalur koridor Jalan Veteran Denpasar. Jurnal Anala, 5(1).

Yasin, M. Y., Yusoff, M. M., Abdullah, J., & Noor, N. M. (2020). Is urban sprawl a threat to sustainable development? A review of characteristics and consequences. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(4), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2020-1604-05


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.