Jenis Seramik Perdagangan di Semenanjung Malaysia: Berdasarkan Koleksi di Muzium dan Ekskavasi Arkeologi (The typical of Trade Ceramic in Peninsula Malaysia: Based on the Collection from Museum and Archaeology Excavation)

ASYAARI MUHAMMAD

Abstract


ABSTRAK: Pengetahuan asas mengenai setiap jenis seramik perdagangan yang ditemui sama ada melalui kajian arkeologi atau dipamerkan di muzium amat penting bagi penyelidik arkeologi. Ini kerana rata-rata penemuan kajian arkeologi sama ada di darat mahupun di dalam air, banyak ditemukan seramik dalam bentuk serpihan dan kurang yang lengkap bentuk dan sifatnya. Dengan mengenal pasti setiap jenis artifak seramik yang ditemui itu akan membantu penyelidik menyelesaikan beberapa isu. Antaranya isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan asal usul tempat seramik itu dihasilkan, usia, jenis, bentuk, corak hiasan dan fungsi seramik tersebut. Kajian arkeologi di Malaysia sejak 45 tahun yang lampau telah menemukan ribuan serpihan seramik yang diperdagangkan di rantau ini. Pengenalpastian identiti seramik tersebut telah menyelesaikan beberapa isu khususnya tentang jenis, asal-usul, usia serta fungsi seramik tersebut dihasilkan. Beberapa kaedah dikenal pasti bagi mengenal pasti setiap serpihan seramik yang ditemui. Antaranya melalui kaedah analisa kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Pemerhatian secara fizikal melalui kaedah tertentu dan analisa saintifik seperti menggunakan kaedah karbon C14, Thermoluninesen, EXR dan XRD banyak membantu ahli arkeologi mengungkai sejarah, asal-usul dan fungsi setiap penemuan seramik tersebut. Melalui pengecaman setiap seramik yang ditemui itu, secara tidak langsung dapat memberi pandangan baru terhadap interpretasi data arkeologi zaman kini.

Kata kunci: Seramik; arkeologi; perdagangan

 

ABSTRACT: A basic knowledge on the different types of trade ceramics found as a result of archaeological research or as displayed in museums is very important for a researcher in archaeology. This is because land-based or underwater archaeological investigations frequently uncover lots of ceramics either in small discrete sherds or incomplete vessels. Having the ability to identify each and every type of ceramics found will greatly enhance the ability of the archaeologist to solve several important issues. These issues include the ceramics’ original place of fabrication, age, type, shape or appearance, decoration patterns, and its ultimate function. Archaeological investigations in Malaysia for the past 45 years have uncovered numerous ceramic sherds that have been traded in the Southeast Asian region. The identification of these ceramics have clarified several issues, especially about its type, origins, age as well as the function for which the ceramics in question was fabricated. Several methods were developed for the purpose of identifying each ceramic sherd found. Some these methods involved qualitative and quantitative analyses. Physical observations by means of specific methods and the use of scientific analyses such as C-14 Radio-carbon dating, Thermoluminescence, ERF and XRD have enabled archaeologists to reconstruct the history, origins and functions of each ceramics find. The ability of identify each ceramics find, indirectly, enables us to have a whole new understanding of how archaeological data is interpreted today.

Keywords: Ceramics; archaeology; trade.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asyaari Muhamad. 1998. Sejarah Seni Tembikar di Perak. Dalam. Tesis Sarjana Persuratan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Bangi. . 2005. Arkeologi dan Seni: Kajian Tembikar Kerajaan Melayu Johor-Riau-Lingga abad 16–19 Masihi. Dalam. Tesis Ph.D. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

Awang Hanapi Hj Maidin. 1999. Tembikar Vietnam di Negara Brunai. Muzium Brunai Darussalam: Brunei.

Brown, Roxanna M. 1977. The Ceramics of South – East Asia: Their Dating and Identification. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Carswell, J. 1985. Blue-and-White: Chinese Porselain and its Impact on the Western World. The United States of America: Congress Printing Co.

Chuimei. edt. 1993. Acro Update, Quarterly Newsletter, January 1993. Dalam. Asian Ceramic Research Organization: The Source of Swatow Wares. The United State of America: Anthropology Department. Field Museum of Natural History.

Garner, Harry. 1970. Oriental Blue and White. London: Faber & Faber.

Gardner, Elizabeth Jane. 1978. The Pottery Technology of the Neolithic Period in Southeastern Europe. Dissertation. University of California. Los Angeles.

Guy S, John, 1986. Oriental Trade Ceramics in South-East Asia Ninth to Sixteenth Centuries. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

____________. 1989. Ceramics Traditions of South-East Asia. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Harrisson, Barbara. 1972. The Ceramic Gallery of the Brunei Museum at Kota Batu: an introduction to the history of trade ceramics. Brunei Museum: Brunei Museum special publication no.3.

____________. 1982. Correlations and Types of Vietnamese Trade Wares: 13th – 19th Centuries. Dalam Vietnamese Ceramics. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Ho Wing Meng. 1987. Straits Chinese Porcelain: A collector’s Guide. Singapore: Times Books International.

Krairiksh, Piriya. 1980. Art in Peninsular Thailand Prior to the Fourteenth Century. Bangkok: Depertment of Fine Arts.

Kramer, Samual Noah. 1969. Cradle of Civilization. Great of Man. Time Life International. Nertherland.

Lam, Peter. 1985. Vietnamese Celadons and their relationship to the Celadon of South China. Dalam Vietnamese Ceramics: A separate Tradition, Art Media Resources with Avery Press

Langmaid, Nancy G. 1978. Prehistory Pottery. Aylesbury. Shire.

Leslie D. 1987. Essays on the Sources for Chinese History. Canberra: Australian National University press.

Lim Suan Poh. 1981. Nonya Ware. Dalam. Nonya ware and Kitchen Ch’ing. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Lunsingh Scheurleer. D.F. 1974. Chinese Export Porcelain. London: Faber & Faber Limited Press.

McKinnon, E. Edwards. 1991. Buku Panduan Keramik. Indonesian Field School of Archaeology Trowulan 1 – 21 Jun, 1991. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, The Ford Foundation.

Medley, Margaret. 1980. The Chinese Potter: A Practical History of Chinese Ceramics. Oxford: Phaidon Press Limited.

Nik Hassan Shuhaimi Nik Abdul Rahman & Othman Mohd. Yatim. 2006. Warisan Lembah Bujang. Kuala Lumpur. Ikatan Ahli Arkeologi Malaysia.

Richards, Dick. 1995. South-East Asian Ceramics: Thai, Vietnamese and Khmer. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Santoso Soegondho.1996. Kajian Tentang Teknologi dan Fungsi Gerabah Gilimanuk dan Plawangan dalam, Jejak-Jejak Budaya II. Asosasi Prehistorisi Indonesia II. Yogyakarta.

Sullivan, M. 1984. The Arts of China. 3rd. edt. USA: University of California Press.

Taylor, Keith W. 1982. A Brief Summary of Vietnamese History. Dalam. Vietnamese Ceramics. Kuala Lumpur: Southeast Asian Ceramic Society & Oxford University Press.

Thomas, Gwilym. 1982. Step by Step Guide to Pottery. Hamlyn. London.

Vickery Michael. 1993. The Constitution of Ayutthaya: An Investigation into the ‘Three Seal’ Code. Dalam 5th International Conference on Thai Studies. London: SOAS.

Willetts, William 1981. Celadon. Dalam. Chinese Celadons and other related wares in Southeast Asia. Singapore: National Museum of Singapore and Southeast Asia Ceramic Society.

Wong, Grace. 1979. Tributary Trade between China and Southeast Asia in the Song Dynasty dalam Chinese Celadons and Other Related Wares in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Arts Orientalis Press.

Y.K.Lam Peter et. All. 1985. A Ceramic Legacy of Asia’s Maritime Trade. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Zhiyan, Li & Cheng Wen. 1984. Chinese Pottery and Porcelain. Tradition Chinese Arts and Culture. Foreign Language Press. Beijing.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 


ISSN 2289-1706 | e-ISSN : 2289-4268 

Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA

© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia