Institutional Co-Operation for Eco-Tourism Management in Royal Belum Forest State Park (RBFSP), Malaysia (Kerjasama Institusi untuk Pengurusan Eco-Pelancongan di Taman Negeri Royal Belum (RBFSP), Malaysia)
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The management of eco-tourism in Malaysia is experiencing a period of transition, from commercially-driven towards sustainable focus management. The shift has caused the authority to prepare a comprehensive development plans as the means to achieve sustainable developments. However the implementation of the programs are in the purview of the respective states as the ‘land is a state matter’. The stakeholders’ reaction to this current phenomena are varied. Some of them are receptive while others are sceptical. In this light, a survey was conducted with participation of 26 respondents among RBFSP stakeholders. They includes the 12 local authorities, eight tourism service providers, one private and four local community (NGO and community). Questionnaires were design to gauge their perspectives of co-management, its importance and to evaluate their current practice of eco-tourism in the RBFSP. In-depth interviews were also carried out on selected stakeholders. The overall result from the stakeholders’ perspective of co-management in RBFSP indicates that 15 stakeholders are ready for co-management to be implemented, while the other 11 stakeholders are quite reluctant. However, all of them including the 11 stakeholders agreed that co-management is important in sustaining the eco-tourism resources. Moreover the cooperation among stakeholders is much needed to ensure the eco-tourism resources are sustainably managed and maintained.
Keywords: Eco-tourism, management; Royal Belum; Malaysia
ABSTRAK: Pengurusan ekopelancongan di Malaysia sedang mengalami tempoh peralihan, daripada tujuan komersial ke arah tumpuan kepada pengurusan lestari. Peralihan ini telah menyebabkan pihak berkuasa untuk menyediakan pelan pembangunan komprehensif untuk mencapai pembangunan lestari. Walau bagaimanapun, pelaksanaan program berada di dalam bidang kuasa negeri masing-masing kerana ‘tanah’ merupakan dalam urusan negeri. Tindak balas pihak berkepentingan dengan fenomena ini adalah berbeza-beza. Sesetengah daripada mereka bersikap terbuka manakala yang lain berasa ragu-ragu. Dalam hal ini, kajian yang telah dijalankan dengan penyertaan 26 responden dalam kalangan pihak berkepentingan RBFSP. Mereka termasuk 12 pihak berkuasa tempatan, 8 penyedia perkhidmatan pelancongan, satu swasta dan empat masyarakat setempat (NGO dan masyarakat). Soal selidik direka bentuk untuk mengukur perspektif mereka bersama pengurusan, kepentingannya dan untuk menilai amalan mereka terhadap ekopelancongan di RBFSP itu. Temu bual juga dijalankan ke atas pihak-pihak berkepentingan yang dipilih. Keputusan keseluruhan daripada perspektif pihak berkepentingan terhadap pengurusan bersama terhadap RBFSP menunjukkan bahawa 15 pihak berkepentingan bersedia untuk bersamapengurusan yang akan dilaksanakan, manakala yang lain, 11 pihak berkepentingan amat berat untuk turut serta. Walau bagaimanapun, kesemua mereka termasuk 11 pihak berkepentingan bersetuju bersama pengurusan adalah penting dalam mengekalkan sumber ekopelancongan. Lebih-lebih lagi kerjasama antara pihak berkepentingan amat diperlukan bagi memastikan sumber ekopelancongan diuruskan secara lestari dan dikekalkan.
Kata kunci: Eko-pelancongan; pengurusan; Royal Belum; Malaysia
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adelzadeth,M., Bryan,T.,&Yafee,S. 2003. Tribal issues and considerations related to collaborative natural resource management. Ecosystem management initiative. University of Michigan http://www.snre.umich.edu/ecomgt/lessons/bumps/Overview%20of%20Tribal%20Issues.pdf
Amran, H. 2004. Policy and Planning of the Tourism Industry in Malaysia. Concurrent session: Policy and Planning of Tourism Product Development in Asian Countries, 6th. ADRF General Meeting, Bangkok.
Andrade, G.S.M., & Rhodes, J.R. 2012. Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society 17(4): 14. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-05216-17041
Boissière, M., D. Sheil, I. Basuki, M. Wan, and H. Le. 2009. Can engaging local people’s interests reduce forest degradation in central Vietnam? Biodiversity Conservation 18:2743–2757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9627-1
Bramwell, B. and Lane, B. 2000a. Collaborative tourism planning: Issues and future directions. In Tourism Collaboration and Partnerships: Politics, Practice and Sustainability, edited by B. Bramwell and B. Lane, 333–41. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.
Bramwell, B. & Sharman, A. 1999. Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Annals of Tourism Research 26(2), 392–415.
Bruner, A., R. Gullison, and A. Balmford. 2004. Financial cost and shortfalls managing and expanding protectedarea systems in developing countries. BioScience 54(12):1119–1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1119: FCASOM]2.0.CO;2
Davison, G. W. H., Soepadmo, E., & Yap, S. K. 1995. The Malaysian heritage and scientific expedition to Belum: Temengor forest reserve, 1993–1994. Malayan Nature Journal 48:133–146.
Goetze, T. C. 2004. Sharing the Canadian Experience with Co-Management: Ideas, Examples and Lessons for Communities in Developing Areas. Working Paper 15, Rural Poverty and the Environment Working Paper Series. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Hezri, A.A. 2011. Sustainable shift: Institutional challenges for the environment in Malaysia. Akademika 81(2): 59-69. http://www.ukm.my/penerbit/akademika/ACROBATAKADEMIKA81-2/81(2)Chap6-locked.pdf
Jamal, T.B. & Getz, D. 1995. Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Annals of Tourism Research 22(1):186-204.
Latiff, A., & Yap, S. K. 2000. An expedition to Belum Forest Reserve, Perak, Peninsular Malaysia: An introduction. Malayan Nature Journal 54:147–149.
Lovelock, B. 2002. Why It’s Good To Be Bad: The Role of Conflict in Contributing Towards Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 10(1):5–30. doi:10.1080/09669580208667150.
Malaysian Nature Society. 2007. Key sites for conservation (MNS) Conservation Publication (8). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Author.
Mohd. Daud, M. 2002. ‘Linking Green Productivity to Ecotourism: Experiences in the Asia Pacific Region’, Asian Productivity Organisation, Tokyo. Chapter 15:128-133. http://www.apo-tokyo.org/publications/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/ind_gp_lgep.pdf
Nor Ivoni, M.I & Saidfudin, M. 2012. Students’ Perception towards Quality Library Service Using Rasch Measurement Model. International Conference on Innovation, Management and Technology Research (ICIMTR2012), Malacca, Malaysia. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nor_Irvoni_Mohd_Ishar/publication/268280554_Students’_perception_towards_quality_library_service_using_Rasch_Measurement_Model/links/5468412e0cf20dedafcf57d4.pdf.
Plummer, R. & Fennell, D. A. 2009. Managing protected areas for sustainable tourism: prospects for adaptive comanagement. Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
Plummer, R., Kulczycki, C. & Stacey, C. 2006. How are we Working Together? A Framework to Assess Collaborative Arrangements in Nature-based Tourism. Current Issues in Tourism.
Schwabe, K. A., RCarson, R. T., DeShazo, J. R., Reese, A. N. & Vincent, J. R. 2014. Conservation in a Developing Country Creation of Malaysia’s Royal Belum State Park: A Case Study. The Journal of EnvironmentDevelopment. http://jed.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/11/28/1070496514551173.DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496514551173.
Selin, S. & Chavez, D. 1995. Developing an evolutionary tourism partnership model. Annals of Tourism Research 22(4): 844–856. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(95)00017-X.
Singleton, S. 2000. Cooperation or Capture? The Paradox of Comanagement and Community Participation in Natural Resource. Management and Environmental Policymaking.http://oregonstate.edu/dept/iifet/2000/papers/singleton.pdf
Suksuwan, S., & Kumaran, S. 2003. A proposal for a management plan for the Royal Belum, Perak Darul Ridzuan with some recommendations. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: WWF-Malaysia.
Thomas, L., Middleton, J. & Philips, A. 2003. Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 10. World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA). IUCN – The World Conservation Union. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/PAG-010.pdf
Vernon, J., Essex, S., Pinder, D. & Curry, K. 2005. Collaborative policymaking: Local sustainable projects. Annals of Tourism Research 32(2): 325–345.
Vincent, J.R., Carson, T.C., DeShavo, J.R., Schwabe, K.A., Ismariah, A., Siew, K.C., Yii, T.C and Potts M.D. 2014. Tropical countries may be willing to pay more to protect their forests. PNAS 111 (28). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1312246111.
Walt, P. 2001. A manual for the co-management of the commercial fisheries in the Pacific. Secretariat of the Pacific Community Noumea, New Caledonia. http://www.spc.int/DigitalLibrary/Doc/FAME/Manuals/Watt_01_ CoManagement.pdf
Worldwide Fund for Nature-Malaysia & Perak State Parks Corporation (PSPC). 2011. Preliminary management plan for Royal Belum State Park (RBSP), Perak. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: WWF-Malaysia.
Documents
th Malaysia Plan, Chapter V111 – Tourism. www.epu.gov.my/en/sixth-malaysia-plan-1990-199951.
th Malaysia Plan, Chapter 16 –Tourism and Distributive Trade. www.epu.gov.my/en/seventh-malaysia-plan-1996-2000.
th Malaysia Plan, Chapter 15. www.epu.gov.my/en/seventhmalaysia-plan-2001-2005.
th Malaysia Plan, Chapter 8. www.epu.gov.my/epu-theme/rm9/html/english/Chapter8.pdf.
th Malaysia Plan, Chapter 3. www.epu.gov.my/en/tenthmalaysia-plan-10th-mp.
Performance Management & Delivery Unit (Pemandu). 2010b. Chapter 10: Reviving up the Tourism Industry, viewed on 11 May 2015. http://etp.pemandu.gov.my/Download_Centre-@-Download_Centre.aspx.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2289-1706 | e-ISSN : 2289-4268
Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA
© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia