Pembangunan Instrumen Penerimaan E-Pembelajaran Pelajar Pascasiswazah Menggunakan Analisis Rasch (Development Instrument Acceptance of E-learning Postgraduate Students Using Rasch Analysis)

HUDIYA ADZHAR, AIDAH ABDUL KARIM, MUHAMMAD UZAIR SAHRIN

Abstract


Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penerimaan e-pembelajaran bagi pelajar pascasiswazah dengan menggunakan analisis Rasch. Objektif kajian ini adalah mengukur instrumen dengan menggunakan ujian-ujian dalam analisis Rasch seperti polariti item, varians reja terpiawai, kebolehpercayaan dan juga peta taburan individu-item. Instrumen ini mengandungi 16 item yang menggunakan skala Likert lima mata dan berasaskan Model UTAUT. Soal selidik ini ditadbir atas 97 orang pelajar pascasiswazah Fakulti Pendidikan UKM Bangi. Program Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) versi 23.0 telah digunakan untuk memasukkan data dan membuat analisis statistik deskriptif sebelum dianalisis menggunakan program Winstep v3.68.2 untuk analisis Rasch. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan kesemua 16 item yang telah dibina memenuhi keperluan Model Rasch dan sesuai digunakan untuk mengukur penerimaan e-pembelajaran. Namun begitu, pembaikan item dari sudut pelarasan bahasa dan struktur ayat serta penambahan bilangan sampel yang lebih besar perlu dilakukan bagi meningkatkan lagi kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan item-item soal selidik ini di masa akan datang. Kajian ini juga menunjukkan bahawa analisis Rasch boleh membantu penyelidik memperbaiki soal selidik yang dibina secara telus dan sistematik. 

Kata kunci: Pembinaan instrumen, penerimaan e-pembelajaran, Model UTAUT, analisis Rasch, pengajian tinggi

 

This study aimed to test the validity and reliability the instrument acceptance of e-learning by using the Rasch analysis. The objectives of this study is using tests in Rasch analysis likes item polarities, variences of standardized residuals, reliability and also the distribution map of individual items. This instrument contains 16 items using Likert scale of five points and based on UTAUT Model. The questionnaire was administered to over 97 postgraduate students from Fakulti Pendidikan UKM. Program Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 was used for data entry and analyzed using descriptive statistics before using Winstep v3.68.2 programme for Rasch analysis. The finding showed that all the 16 items that have been built to meet the requirements and is fit using Rasch Model to measure the acceptance of e-learning. However, the repair item for angle adjustment of language and sentence structure as well as the addition of a larger number of samples need to be done to improve the validity and reliability of the items of the questionnaire in the future. The study also showed that the Rasch analysis can help researchers improve the questionnaire constructed in a transparent and systematic.

Keywords: Instrument development, e-learning acceptance, UTAUT Model, Rasch analysis, higher education


Keywords


Instrument development, e-learning acceptance, UTAUT Model, Rasch analysis, higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, R. A. Abdullah, M. L. Abdullah, W. S. W. & Hamid, M. R. A. 2013. Pengesahan instrumen penerimaan e-pembelajaran. Jurnal Pengukuran Kualiti dan Analisis, (9) 2: 1-10.

Baru, S. A. Abdullah, L. Ali, A. & Yusoff, H. 2014. Pemodelan penerimaan pelajar terhadap persekitaran pembelajaran maya (VLE). Journal of Business and Social Development, (2) 2: 36-47.

Basri, M. 2005. Jurang digital dan kesan terhadap perkembangan perkembangan e-komuniti di Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana. Pusat Kajian E-Komuniti, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Bond, T. & C. M. Fox. 2015. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Nes York: Routledge.

Bond, T.G. & Fox, C.M. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Effendi, M. Matore, E.M. & Khairani, A.Z. 2014. Mengenal pasti cabaran pelajar Politeknik di Malaysia menerusi model Rasch. Journal of Psychology, 45 (1): 30-45.

Eldy, E. F. & F. Sulaiman. 2015. E-learning in physics courses: A preliminary findings of students’ acceptance. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, Special Issue, 30: 21-23.

Fisher, W.P. 2007. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21 (1): 1095.

Fox, C.M. &. Jones, J.A . 1998. Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1): 30.

Hamdan, A. & S. Rosseni Din 2013. Penerimaan m-pembelajaran dalam sistem pendidikan di Malaysia melalui the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Satu analisis literatur. Mobil Learning, Applications, and Services, 1(2): 93-97.

Handayani, T. & Sudiana. 2015. Analisis penerapan Model Utaut terhadap perilaku pengguna sistem informasi. Studi kasus: Sistem informasi akademik pada STTNAS Yogyakarta.

http://stta.name/data_lp3m/17.Trie.pdf. (10 November 2016).

Jamilluddin, N.A. & Rahman, M.J.A. 2017. Penggunaan e-pembelajaran untuk tujuan pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar: Pembelajaran abad ke-21. Bangi: Penerbitan Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Karim, A.A., Shah P,M., Din, R.& Lubis M.A. 2014. Developing information skills test for Malaysian youth students using Rasch analysis. International Education Studies, 7 (13): 112-122.

Kearsley, G. 1995. The effectiveness and impact of online learning in graduate education. Educational Technology, 35 (6): 37-42.

Kline, R. B. 1999. Book review: Psychometric theory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17 (3): 275-280.

Krishnan, J. Said, M.N.H.M. Atan N. A. & Hassan, J. 2011. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan epembelajaran di kalangan pelajar tahun akhir Jabatan Multimedia (SPK, SPT dan SPP) Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal of Social Science, 3: 206-225.

Linacre, J. 2010. A user’s guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Program manual 3.68. 0. Chicago: WINSTEPS.com.

Nasir, M. 2013. Evaluasi penerimaan teknologi informasi mahasiswa di Palembang menggunakan Model UTAUT. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI), 1(1).

Olsen, L.W. 2003. Essays on George Rasch and his contributions to statistics. Denmark: Københavns Universitet, Økonomisk Institut.

Rahayah, A.S. 2008. Inovasi dalam pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Sekaran, U. & R. Bougie. 2016. Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Boston: John Wiley & Sons.

Sick, J. 2010. Assumptions and requirements of Rasch measurement. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 14 (2): 23-29.

Sihes, A.J.B. & Sani, N.B. 2010. Pelaksanaan e-pembelajaran di kalangan pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan dan Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Skudai:

Sumintono, B. & W. Widhiarso. 2014. Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Sumintono, B. 2014. Model Rasch untuk penelitian sosial kuantitatif. Jakarta: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Sundaravej, T. 2010. Empirical validation of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13 (1): 5-27.

Tasir, Z. J. Harun & L. S. Yen 2006. Faktor Penggunaan komputer dan kaitannya dengan kesediaan mengikuti pembelajaran dalam talian di kalangan pelajar Sarjana. Sains Humanika, 44 (1).

Yusof, S.Z.M. & Karim. A.A. 2015. Pembinaan instrumen penerimaan m-pembelajaran untuk pelajar pusat pengajian tinggi di Malaysia dengan menggunakan analisis Rasch. Rosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara, 5: 389-398.

Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis & F.D. Davis 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: 425-478.

Wright, B.D. & G.N. Masters. 1982. Rating scale analysis. Rasch measurement. ERIC.

Wright, B.D. & M.M.Mok 2004. An overview of the family of Rasch measurement models. Introduction to Rasch Measurement, 1-24.

Wright, B. D. 1994. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans, 8: 370.

Wu, M. & R. Adams. 2007. Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Educational Measurement Solutions Melbourne.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The editors and publisher of Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.