The Submammary-Evert (Sub-E) Technique for Excision of Benign Breast Lumps in Underdeveloped and Developing Countries - A Case Series

Kok Liang Tan, Kanmani A/P Murugesu, Adi Syazni Muhammed, Norlia Abdullah

Abstract


The Submammary-Evert (Sub-E) technique is a novel technique for the excision of one or multiple benign breast lumps. It may be performed by surgical trainees and general surgeons. It is best suited for deep seated, medium to large breast lumps. It enables the lump or lumps to be excised through one hidden inframammary scar. As the approach is through the avascular submammary plane, blood loss is minimised. Unlike the endoscopic or percutaneous vacuum assisted biopsy, this procedure is easy to learn with no additional instruments required; thus minimising cost. This makes it feasible to be performed in underdeveloped and developing countries. We describe a series of ten women (age 18-35 years old) with one or multiple breast lumps (1-5 breast lumps) who underwent this procedure. The size of the lumps measured 1-13 cm. All lumps measuring a minimum of 3 cm were located at the upper half or retroareolar region. The duration of surgery for excision of a lump was 50-100 minutes. The surgery to remove 5 lumps took the longest time of 125 minutes. There were no intra or post-operative complications.


Keywords


Benign; breast; excision; evert; submammary; sub-E

Full Text:

PDF

References


WebMD Editorial Contributors. Fibroadenoma. https://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/what-are-fibroadenomas [26 May 2024].

Azizah AM, Hashimah B, Nirmal K, et al: Malaysian National Cancer Registry Report 2012-2016. National Cancer Institute. Ministry of Health; Putrajaya, Malaysia. 2019.

Cheema HS, Mehta R, Slanetz PJ. Imaging and management of fibroepithelial breast lesions on percutaneous core needle biopsy. Breast J 2020; 26: 1216-20.

Gillete DP, He J, Lee AE, Chao C. Indications for the surgical excision of fibroadenomas: Systematic review. AME Surgical J 2023; 3: 3.

Balachandran NR, Abdullah N, Ismail MI, Wong YP, Azmi MI. Recurrent and transformation of borderline to malignant phyllodes tumour with osteoid differentiation: A case report and literature review. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1377074.

Robles DT, Berg D. Abnormal wound healing: Keloids. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25(1): 26-32.

Key Differences. Difference between developed countries and developing countries (with comparison chart). https://keydifferences.com/ [26 March 2025].

Krings G, Bean GR, Chen YY. Fibroepithelial lesions; The WHO spectrum. Semin Diagn Pathol 2017; 34(5): 438-52.

Park HL, Kim LS. The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease. J Breast Cancer 2011; 14(1):1-7.

Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: Initial results. Radiology 2000; 215(3): 694-7.

Perez-Fuentes JA, Longobardi IR, Acosta VF, Marin CE, Liberman I. Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Preliminary experience in Venezuela. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(6): 1459-63.

Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Burak WE. Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance. Am J Surg 2002; 184(4): 332-6.

Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ et al. Sonographically guided directional vacuum – assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. Am J Roetgenol 2001; 177(2): 405-8.

Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum -assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998; 208: 251-60.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSA.2025.1501.02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-issn 2231-7481