Repositioning the Bar and the Bench in Quest for National Development

Ibrahim Imam, Abdulwahab Olasupo Egbewole

Abstract


This paper investigates the contributions of the Bench (judges) and the Bar (Legal Practitioners) to development in Nigeria with particular emphasis on economic growth. The exploration is borne out of the mirage of challenges militating against implementation of development economic policies in the country and in particular is the incontestability of phenomenon of dispute, which inadvertently affects economic growth. In the realm of development, it is contended that the extent of judicial independence, complemented with a vibrant legal practitioner in the discharge of their respective constitutional responsibilities correlate with economic growth. In respect of the Bar, aside from representing clients in courts they contribute to economic growth and development through completing business and contractual obligations and commercial transactions, resolving disputes, facilitating the flow of funds and investments, encouraging innovation through the protection of intellectual property rights, and advising entrepreneurs on viable business solutions. Thus, a better and strong performing judiciary and lawyers without interference have shown to lead to more developed economy, associated with rapid growth of large, small, and medium businesses in the economy. While dispute is inevitable, in the sphere of economy, the right of contending parties to institute action or defend in courts as well as the right of the parties to be represented by legal practitioners makes the institution of the judiciary and the bar significant. This paper, which employs doctrinal research method, explores the constitutional mandates of the Bar and the Bench as agents of justice administration to determine the institutions contributions to development. The paper found that the Bar and the Bench have roles to play in propelling developmental economic strategies and implementations by making sure that due process and democratic norms are revered. It is concluded that for Bar and Bench to contribute to development there must be harmonious relationship between the without compromising justice.


Keywords


Bench; judiciary; development litigation; constitution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bryan, A. G. 2007. Blacks Law Dictionary, 8th ed, Thomson West, London.

Cheung Wai-Lam, 2000. The Process of Appointing Judges of some Foreign Countries; The United States, Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council Secretariat, (2000) (Aug. 20, 2015) http://leguo.gov.hk (17 January 2021).

Gillian Hadfield, 2007. ‘Don't Forget the Lawyers, DEPAUL L. Revs 56, p. 401

Gordon, R. W. Gordon, 2010. The role of lawyer in producing rule of law, Yale Law School Legal Repository, pp. 448-449.

Hamiter, J. B. 1960.The ideal Relationship between the Bench and the Bar Lousiana Law Review, 20 (4) p. 23

Imam I. 2018. The Paradigm of Judicial Independence in Nigeria: A Comparative Exposition of Judicial Appointment in the High Court, Egbewole, W. O. (ed.) Judicial Independence in Africa, (ed.), London, Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing, pp. 20-36, http://www.wildy.com

Joe B. Hamiter, 1960. ‘Forum Juridicum: The Ideal Relationship Between the Bench and the Bar, La. L. Rev. 20 https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol20/iss4/6 (7 February 2021).

Kaufman, I. 1980. The Essence of Judicial Independence, (1980), Constitutional Law Review, 80, p. 681.

Mclane Wardlaw, 2010. Umpire, Empathy and Activism, Notre Dame Law Review, 85 p. 1660

Richard, L. A. 1989. ‘American Lawyers (1989); L. Richard Abel, (ed.), the Legal Profession in England and Wales, Hein Online, Theoretical Inq. L. 11 (441), p. 448.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.