Sebuah Nafas Baharu Undang-Undang Gangguan Seksual di Malaysia: Perkembangan Tort Gangguan Seksual sebagai Kausa Tindakan (A New Breath of Sexual Harassment Law in Malaysia: The Development of Sexual Harassment Tort as a Cause of Action)

Faten Maisara Ahmad Safri, Aizatul Aina Mohamad Nizam, Shahrul Mizan Ismail

Abstract


Sexual harassment and sexual assault is not uncanny within our nation. Worse, these incidents occurred way common as if it’s in the nature of our status quo. This indecent and immoral issue should be paid more attention to the public as it is a matter affecting individuals honour and dignity as well as damaging to the emotional state of the victims. Yet, some issues arose regarding the existing laws that are enough to protect the rights of the victims. This is due to the public only aware of previous sexual related cases, the perpetrator to be punished or sanctioned through criminal laws. However, the laymen were not aware that the victims may and can claim compensation from the perpetrator by civil actions which in the law of tort. As can be seen, the main objective of this writing is to analyze whether sexual harassment is a lawful cause of action under tort law. At the same time, the author also makes an approach to differentiate action can be taken in overcoming sexual harassment which in between of civil laws and criminal laws including its concequences. The research methods used by the authors are qualitative methods through research and case study. The findings in this writing is that apart from criminal laws that are set to punish the perpetrator, the law of tort under the civil suit can help the victim to receive compensation from the said perpetrator

 

Abstrak

Gangguan serta serangan seksual bukanlah sesuatu yang asing di negara kita. Lebih teruk lagi, hampir setiap hari perkara ini berlaku seperti yang sentiasa dipaparkan di media sosial dan dada-dada akhbar. Perkara ini sewajarnya dipandang serius daripada pelbagai pihak kerana ia melibatkan maruah, memberikan kesan emosi serta merupakan sebuah perkara yang sensitif bagi mangsa. Namun begitu, timbul persoalan bahawa sama ada undang-undang sedia ada sudah mencukupi untuk melindungi hak serta kepentingan mangsa gangguan seksual? Hal ini demikian kerana, orang awam hanya menyedari bahawa kes-kes yang melibatkan gangguan serta serangan seksual ini hanya akan menghukum si pelaku melalui undang-undang jenayah. Akan tetapi, ramai juga yang masih tidak mengetahui bahawa mangsa juga boleh menerima ganti rugi akibat daripada tindakan si pelaku iaitu menerusi tindakan sivil dalam undang- undang tort. Oleh itu, objektif penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis sama ada gangguan seksual sebuah kausa tindakan yang sah di bawah undang-undang tort. Dalam masa yang sama, penulis juga membuat pendekatan untuk melihat perbezaan tindakan yang diambil dalam menangani gangguan seksual iaitu antara undang-undang sivil dan undang-undang jenayah serta apakah kesannya. Kaedah metodologi yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah kajian kualitatif menerusi kaedah kepustakaan dan kajian kes. Dapatan daripada penulisan ini adalah, selain daripada mengambil tindakan undang-undang jenayah untuk menghukum si pelaku, tindakan saman sivil dalam undang-undang tort ternyata membantu mangsa untuk menerima ganti rugi daripada pelaku.

Kata kunci: Gangguan seksual; tindakan saman sivil; undang-undang tort; kausa tindakan


Keywords


Sexual harassment; sexual assault; civil suit; law of tort; cause of action

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Majid, Sri Yogamalar, Audrey Kim Lan Siah, Jane LY Terpstra-Tong & Borrowman, L. 2019. A new chapter in the law of sexual harassment in Malaysia: The emergence of the torts of harassment and sexual harassment. Common Law World Review 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779519875464.

Ahmad Johari bin Mohd Ali. 2022. Ain Husniza, bapa fail tuntutan balas. Harian Metro, 11 Mac. https:// www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2022/03/819849/ain- husniza-bapa-fail-tuntutan-balas [25 April 2022].

Aizat Sharif. 2022. Hasil siasatan penganggur lakukan gangguan seksual terhadap anak diserah kepada TPR. Harian Metro, 16 April. https://www.hmetro. com.my/mutakhir/2022/04/832663/hasil-siasatan- penganggur-lakukan-gangguan-seksual-terhadap- anak-diserah [16 April 2022].

Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964 [Akta 91].

Dechant v Law Society of Alberta [2006] ABQB 908. Faridah Awang, Raja Kamariah Raja Mohd Khalid & Azyyati Mat Zam. 2020. Pemahaman dan pengalaman gangguan seksual dalam kalangan masyarakat Malaysia. International Journal of Social Policy and Society 16.

Fiske. S.T. 1993. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist 48(6) American Psychologist 48(6): 621-628. https://www. doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.48.6.621.

Flora Gnanapragasam & Anor v Sitt Tatt Bhd [2002] 1 ILR 98 (IC).

Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn Bhd v. Edwin Michael Jalleh & Anor [2013] 4 ILR.

Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang [1988] 2 MLJ 12.

Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17.

Lau Tat Wai lwn Yip Kuen Joey (2013) HKCFI 639.

Lee Hooi Hong & Ors v The Haven Premier Sdn Bhd [2018] MLJU 82.

Mohd Ghazali bin Yusoff lwn Holiday Villa Hotel & Suites Alor Star [2014] 3 ILJ 203.

Mohd Ridzwan Abdul Razak v. Asmah Hj Mohd Nor [2016] 4 MLJ 282.

Mohd. Haikal Isa. 2021. Tak boleh usik langsung, kuat ‘back up’ – PU Syed. Kosmo, 22 September. https:// www.kosmo.com.my/2021/09/22/tak-boleh-usik- langsung-kuat-back-up-pu-syed/ [10 Mei 2022].

Muzaffar Syah B Mallow. 2010. Sexual harassment in the workplace: The current law and practice in Malaysia. Industrial Law Journal.

Nasri v. Mesah [1971] 1 MLJ 32.

Natasha Adilla Mahazir & Tengku Noor Azira Bt Tengku Zainudin. 2020. Pemakaian undang-undang tort dalam tuntutan saman gangguan seksual di Malaysia. Current Legal Issues 2: 53-67.

Pang, J. 2018. [Office Parrots] The brand new tort of sexual harassment: 5 things we learnt, Can Law Report, 21 September. https://canlawreport.com/ officeparrots-harassment/ [25 Mei 2022].

Read v Brown (1888) 22 QBD 128 131.

Shahrul Mizan Ismail & Yusfarizal Yusoff. 2016. Civil Litigation in Malaysia: A Practical Guideline to Drafting Pleadings. International Law Book Services.

Shamsinar Rahman & Suria Fadhillah Md Fauzi. 2018. Gangguan seksual di tempat kerja: Tinjauan undang- undang. GADING (Online) Journal for Social Science 22 (Special Issue).

Siti Marziah Zakaria, Nor Ba’yah Abdul Kadir & Norhazila Mat Lazim. 2019. Gangguan seksual: Tragedi yang tidak didedahkan dan kesan kepada mangsa. Journal of Management & Muamalah 9(1): 13-21.

Teh Khian Woei v. Citibank Berhad [2011] 12 LNS 1229.

The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN). Sexua Harassment. https://www.rainn.org/articles/ sexual-harassment#:~:text=Sexual%20 harassment%20is%20a%20broad,the%20 consent%20of%20the%20victim [10 Mei 2022].

Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78.

Walen, A. 2020. Retributive justice. Dlm Zalta, E.N. (ed), The (Stanford) Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University: Metaphysics Research Lab. https:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/justice- retributive/ [11 Mei 2022].

Williams, L.M. & Walfield, S. Rape and sexual assault. 2016. Dlm Friedman, H.S. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mental Health. 2nd Edn. Vol 4. Waltham: Academic Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.