Intercultural Communication and Mutualistic Relationship between the Chinese and the Minangnese in Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Abstract
Ethnic-Chinese groups have lived in urban areas throughout Indonesia for hundreds of years, including the city of Padang in West Sumatra. Here, the Chinese have been able to maintain a harmonious relationship with the Minangnese, the original inhabitants of the region and the dominant culture. Though both ethnic groups have a strong trading ethos and profess different religions, a situation that, in theory, encourages social conflict, this is not the case in Padang. However, recent research has sparked concern about growing anti-Chinese sentiments in Indonesia. These findings suggest that the phenomenon of the harmonious relationship between the Chinese and Minangnese in Padang merits further research. This study has been designed to analyze intercultural communication and relations between the Chinese and Minangnese ethnic groups in Padang by utilizing five elements of culture from Samovar, Porter, and McDaniel. It uses a qualitative approach and a case-study method conducted intermittently from January 2016 to June 2017. Data was collected through interviews with 39 ethnic Chinese and Minangnese informants, observations conducted in the predominately Chinese district of Padang (Chinatown), along with document reviews as secondary data. The study found that six out of eight identified characteristics of cultural elements of the Chinese and Minangnese in Padang exhibit significant similarity. These are: history in Padang, collective social organization, values based upon a trading ethos, a situational nature and flexibility to adapt, and the language in common use. The significant similarities of cultural elements leads to effective communication and supports more harmonious inter-ethnic relationships.
Keywords: Intercultural communication, mutualistic relationship, chinese and minangnese ethnic groups, cultural elements, effective communication.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alfirdaus, L. K. (2014). Cultural practices and grass root democracy strengthening: A case study in two communities’ collective recovery in indonesia’s post-disaster situations. International Indonesia Forum, 2014 Working Paper Series 2. Retrieved from http://iif.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/02-Cultural-Practices-and-Grass-Root-Democracy-Strengthening_Reviewed.pdf
Alfirdaus, L. K., Hiariej, E., & Adeney-Risakotta, F. (2014). Politik relasi etnik: Matrilinealitas dan etnik minoritas Cina di Padang, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Komunitas, 6(1), 136-150. doi: 10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.294
Alfirdaus, L. K., Hiariej, E., & Adeney-Risakotta, F. (2016). The position of Minang-Chinese relationship in the history of inter-ethnic groups relations in Padang, West Sumatra. Humaniora, 28(1). Retrieved from https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/11506/8572
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality – A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. UK: Penguin Books.
BPS (Statistical Bureau) Kota Padang. (2011). Pengolahan hasil sensus penduduk Kota Padang 2010.
Dahana, A. (2015). Indonesian peranakan Chinese: The origins and their culture. Retrieved from http://chinese.binus.ac.id/2015/02/18/indonesian-peranakan-chinese-the-origins-and-their-culture-by-prof-a-dahana/
Elfira, M. (2011). Inter-ethnic Relations in Padang of West Sumatra navigating between assimilation and exclusivity. Wacana, 13(2), 293–304. Retrieved from http://www.ijil.ui.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/2550
Erniwati. (2007). Asap hio di Ranah Minang. Penerbit Ombak.
Erniwati. (2016). 140 tahun Heng Beng Tong sejarah perkumpulan Tionghoa 1876-2016. Komunitas Bambu. Retrieved from https://osf.io/ve7hw/
Fast/Jpnn. (7 December 2011). Cina Padang, berbahasa Minang logat Mandarin. Retrieved from http://www.jpnn.com/read/2011/12/07/110504/Cina-Padang,-Berbahasa-Minang-Logat-Mandarin-
Fei, X. (1992). From the Soil. The foundation of Chinese society (A Translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo). US: University of California Press.
Fisher, B. A. (1986). Teori-teori komunikasi (Jalaluddin Rakhmat, Eds.). Bandung: Remadja Karya CV.
Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. (2019). A first look at communication theory. NY: McGrawHill Education.
Gudykunst, W. B., Lee, C. M., Nishida, T., & Ogawa, N. (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication. In W. B. Gudykunst (Eds), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 3-32). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hoon, C.-Y. (2006). Reconceptualising ethnic Chinese identity in post-Suharto Indonesia (PhD Thesis of the University of Western Australia School of Social and Cultural Studies Discipline of Asian Studies). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=enandas_sdt=0%2C5andq=chang+yau+hoon+assimilation+universityandbtnG
Joyce Cheah Lynn-Sze, Norhafezah Yusof, & Mohd Khairie Ahmad. (2014). The relevance of confucian values to leadership communication. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 30(Special Issue), 129-144.
Kompas.com. (9 Mei 2017). Terbukti menodai agama Ahok Divonis 2 tahun penjara. Retrieved from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2017/05/09/10560111/terbukti.menodai.agama.ahok.divonis.2.tahun.penjara
Liliweri, A. (2016). Konfigurasi dasar teori-teori komunikasi antarbudaya. Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media.
Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Intercultural communication in contexts (5th ed.). NY: McGraw Hill.
Matamatapolitik.com (28 September 2018). Merpati putih atau kampanye hitam. Retrieved from https://www.matamatapolitik.com/pilpres-2019-merpati-putih-atau-kampanye-hitam/
Moleong, L. J. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, D. (2012). Cultures and communication: An Indonesian scholar’s perspective. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, D. (2015). Ilmu komunikasi suatu pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Navis, A. A. (2017). Pemikiran Minangkabau catatan budaya. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
Qin, X. (2014). Exploring the impact of culture in five communicative elements case of intercultural misunderstandings between Chinese and American. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 34(March). Retrieved from http://immi.se/intercultural
Rakhmat, J. (2018). Psikologi komunikasi edisi revisi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Komunikasi lintas budaya (Edisi 7, Translator: Indri Margaretha Sidabalok & S.S. Salemba Humanika). Jakarta Selatan: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & Jain, N. C. (1981). Understanding intercultural communication. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Setijadi, C. (2017). Chinese Indonesians in the eyes of the Pribumi public. Perspective ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 73.
Siagian, H. F., & Tike, A. (2019). Cultural adaptation of Indonesian diaspora in Thailand’s social contexts. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 268-285.
Sugiyono. (2015). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung.
Suparlan. (2014). Menuju masyarakat Indonesia yang multikultural. Antropologi Indonesia, North America, 0. Retreived on 2019, October 23, from http://www.ijil.ui.ac.id/index.php/jai/article/view/3448/2729
Suryadinata, L. (2018, Jan 9). Ethnic groups and the Indonesian Nation-state from: Routledge handbook of contemporary Indonesia. US: Routledge. Retrieved on 2018, September 10, from https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315628837-3
Syarizan Dalib, Minah Harun, Norhafezah Yusof, & Mohd Khairie Ahmad. (2019). Exploring intercultural competence among students in Malaysian campuses. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 1-16.
Zubir, Z. (2009). Silang bahasa dan budaya menuju integrasi bangsa. Linguistika Kultura, 3(1). Retrieved from http://jurnalvivid.fib.unand.ac.id/index.php/lingkul/article/view/95/0
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528