Transparency and Its Manifestations in Russian Media Discourse: A Case Study of HC Traktor

Elena M. Khakimova, Anna V. Krasavina, Olga A. Tolstykh

Abstract


The article explores the manifestations of transparency related to the Russian political management in 2018–2019. A discursive analysis included the media materials covering the decision by Chelyabinsk (the seventh largest city in Russia) regional authorities, without public discussion, to allocate significant funds from the city budget to support HC Traktor. The public discussion of this issue was widely reflected in the media. Civic activists accessed official online documents concerning the participatory financing and initiated an online dialogue with the authorities, disagreeing with their decisions, offering alternatives, and suggesting that internal political management be made more public. The study systematizes various aspects of transparency: openness, availability, clarity, democracy, visibility and accountability. Since new media and social networks play a key role in the interaction between the state authorities and public, the paper considers all the structural elements of modern media communication: addressees, target audience, channels of information, the content and form of publications, their perlocutionary effect. The results of our study proved that communicative success was reached by breaking language standards, polycode information delivery, and storytelling techniques. The perlocutionary effect of this transparent media communication was difficult and deferred. The public dialogue did not satisfy the initial public demand, but it did influence the management practices (further reflected in Russia’s federal legislation) and accompanied changes in the composition of regional elites.

 

Keywords: Transparency, information society, public authorities, tropes, stylistic devices, storytelling.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-04


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, D., Rachmiatie, A., & Nursyawal. (2019). Public participation model for public information disclosure. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3504-19

Anderson, M., & Caumont, A. (2014, September 24). How social media is reshaping news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/24/how-social-media-is-reshaping-news/

Ashmanov, I., & Ivanov, A. (2011). Website optimization and promotion in search engines. https://web-helps.ru/assets/files/books/ashmanov-optimizaciya-i-prodvijenija-saytov-v-poiske.pdf

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 158–187. https://doi.org/ds6tkc

Chelyabinsk City Duma (Chelduma Official Website). (2020). ОТЧЕТУ ОБ ИСПОЛНЕНИИ БЮДЖЕТА ГОРОДА ЧЕЛЯБИНСКА ЗА 2020 ГОД (The report on the execution of the budget of the City of Chelyabinsk for 2020). https://chelduma.ru/duma/public_hearings/2021/budget/2019-2020/index.php

Casadesús De Mingo, A., & Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A. (2018). Improving records management to promote transparency and prevent corruption. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.005

Castells, M. (2013). Communication power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, USA.

Charter of the city of Chelyabinsk. (2015). https://docs.cntd.ru/document/432944930

Cuillier, D., & Piotrowski, S. J. (2009). Internet information-seeking and its relation to support for access to government records. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.001

de Juana-Espinosa, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2020). Open government data portals in the European Union: A dataset from 2015 to 2017. Data in Brief, 29, 105156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105156

Demshar, F. (2016). Mass media as a mechanism of transparency in the implementation of state policy. Communicology, 4(1), 13–28. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sredstva-massovoy-kommunikatsii-kak-mehanizm-transparentnosti-pri-realizatsii-gosudarstvennoy-politiki

Dewey, M. (2021). Anyone can do YouTube, but not everyone can do public access: Urban politics, production tools, and a communications infrastructure to call home. Television & New Media, 22(7), 779-798. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420928462

Dijk, T. V. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave.

Ganascia, J. G. (2011). The new ethical trilemma: Security, privacy and transparency. Comptes Rendus Physique, 12(7), 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2011.07.002

Green, T. (2019). Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet-era transformation of scholarly communications. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1219

Hassan, M. S., Mahbob, M. H., Allam, S. N. S., Mustaffa, F., & Ibrahim, N. A. N. (2022). Media literacy and young people’s integrity in political participation: A structural equation modelling approach. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(4), 355-373. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3804-20

Hawes, J.O., Rawlins, B, and Plowman, K.D. (2015). Transparency and city government communications. Public Relations Journal, 9(3), 1-16.

Karlsson, M. (2020). Dispersing the opacity of transparency in journalism on the appeal of different forms of transparency to the general public. Journalism Studies, 21(13), 1795–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1790028

Karlsson, M., & Clerwall, C. (2018). Transparency to the rescue? Evaluating citizens’ views on transparency tools in journalism. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1923–1933. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2018.1492882

Kjeldsen, J. E. (2021). Eager to be in touch with the world: The practice and study of rhetoric in Scandinavia. Southern Communication Journal, 86(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2021.1882546

Kolosovich, M. (2019). Transparency of public bodies: Normative regulation, the concept, content and means of ensuring. Государство и право, 7, 16-28. https://doi.org/mhjf

Kos, D., & Kloppenburg, S. (2019). Digital technologies, hyper-transparency and smallholder farmer inclusion in global value chains. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 41, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.011

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37-51). New York: Harper and Row.

Mateus, S. (2021). Welcome to media rhetoric–where human persuasion and technological means collide. Southern Communication Journal, 86(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2021.1884282

Mueller, M. L. (2015). Hyper-transparency and social control: Social media as magnets for regulation. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 804–810. https://doi.org/gmcrdx

On the governor of the Chelyabinsk region: Law (2004, November 12). https://docs.cntd.ru/document/424078922

Openness of the state in Russia–2020. (2020). https://ach.gov.ru/upload/pdf/Otkrytost-2020.pdf

Pineda, A., Fernández Gómez, J. D., & Rebollo-Bueno, S. (2021). “We have taken a major step forward today”: The use of Twitter by Spanish minor parties. Southern Communication Journal, 86(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2021.1882545

Porlezza, C., & di Salvo, P. (2020). The accountability and transparency of whistleblowing platforms issues of networked journalism and contested boundaries. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2285–2304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1842233

Pujihartati, S. H., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., Kartono, D. T., & Demartoto, A. (2023). New media and green behaviour campaign through corporate social responsibility collaboration. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(2), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3902-18

RF open data portal. (2021). https://data.gov.ru/

Rovinskaya, T. (2020). Transparency in the information era: Good or evil? World Economy and International Relations, 64(9), 126–138. https://doi.org/mhjj

Sanderson, J. (2009). “Thanks for fighting the good fight”: Cultivating dissent on Blogmaverick.com. Southern Communication Journal, 74(4), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940802650153

Sedmihradská, L. (2015). Budget transparency in Czech local government. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00774-1

Timokhina, E. A., Gavrilova, N. V., Shapovalova, N. A., Fenin, A. Y., & Antsyferova, I. S. (2017). 25 questions on initiative budgeting. Moscow: Т8 Izdatelskiye Tekhnologii. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350358073_25_Questions_on_Initiative_Budgeting

WJP Open Government Index. (2015). WJP Open Government Index 2015 Report. https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index/wjp-open-government-index-2015

Zetterberg, L., Sjöström, S., & Markström, U. (2014). The compliant court — Procedural fairness and social control in compulsory community care. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(6), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.027

Zubarevich, N. V. (2016, February 1) Four Russias: The new political reality. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/four-russias-new-political-reality/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528