The Impact of Digital Platforms on Television Content Production Strategies: A Systematic Review
Abstract
The platformization of the television industry has significantly transformed content production strategies, compelling producers to adapt to digital-first environments dominated by streaming platforms such as Netflix, YouTube, and other OTT services. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to synthesize how digital platforms reshape television content production and how producers respond to these changes. Using the PRISMA 2020 framework, the review analyzed 14 peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024, selected through a multi-phase screening and quality appraisal process. Thematic synthesis identified five recurring themes: structural adaptation, content transformation, audience engagement, economic realignment, and regulatory responses. The findings indicate that the most prominent effects of platformization occur at the structural and economic levels, followed by audience engagement and content transformation, while regulatory responses remain comparatively less explored. Content producers increasingly rely on workflow flexibility, multiplatform distribution, audience metrics, and differentiated monetization strategies to remain competitive. At the same time, they must negotiate both formal regulation and platform-based governance. This review addresses a gap in the literature by providing a more integrated understanding of how television production is being reorganized under platform conditions and by highlighting the strategic adaptations required for sustainability in a platform-driven media ecosystem.
Keywords: Digital platforms, television content production, platformization, audience engagement, economic realignment.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu Seman, M. Z., Pitchan, M. A., & Wan Mahmud, W. A. W. (2024). Kesan kemahiran digital terhadap penggunaan media OTT penyiaran awam Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 267–285. https://doi.org/qx57
Birkner, T., Keute, A., & Davydova, A. (2024). The digital turn from a newsroom perspective—How German journalists from different generations reflect on the digitalization of journalism. Journalism, 25(5), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/qx58
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/f36ndk
Geni, G. L., Briandana, R., & Umarella, F. H. (2021). The strategies of television broadcast during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study on Indonesian television. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 243–256.
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0138237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
Hidalgo-Marí, T., & García-Escrivá, V. (2024). The production of Spanish fiction series for SVOD: Evolution, trends and strategies. Communication & Society, 37(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.2.35-48
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/qx59
Kelly, J. P. (2022). “This title is no longer available”: Preserving television in the streaming age. Television & New Media, 23(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420928480
Lee, S., Lee, S., Joo, H., & Nam, Y. (2021). Examining factors influencing early paid over-the-top video streaming market growth: A cross-country empirical study. Sustainability, 13(10), 5702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105702
Lefebvre, C., Glanville, J., Briscoe, S., Featherstone, R., Littlewood, A., Metzendorf, M.-I., Noel-Storr, A., Paynter, R., Rader, T., Thomas, J., & Wieland, L. S. (2024). Searching for and selecting studies. In J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.5). Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04
Li, J., & Lee, G. (2024). The role of broadcasters and brand image in improving consumer loyalty—Evidence from live streaming on Chinese social platforms. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241239457
Morissan. (2019). The influence of regulator on television content in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3504-14
Noh, S. (2024). Global media streams: Netflix and the changing ecosystem of anime production. Television & New Media, 25(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/g6kc6x
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Potter, A., & Lotz, A. D. (2022). The first stage of Australia’s digital transition and its implications for Australian television drama. Media International Australia, 182(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211030370
Ratner, Y., Dvir Gvirsman, S., & Ben-David, A. (2023). “Saving journalism from Facebook’s death grip”? The implications of content-recommendation platforms on publishers and their audiences. Digital Journalism, 11(8), 1410–1431. https://doi.org/qx6b
Røsok-Dahl, H., & Kristine Olsen, R. (2025). Snapping the news: Dynamic gatekeeping in a public service media newsroom reaching young people with news on Snapchat. Journalism, 26(9), 2000-2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241255701
Shapiro, S. (2020). Algorithmic television in the age of large-scale customization. Television & New Media, 21(6), 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420919691
Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Ubud, S. (2022). The effect of electronic word of mouth on online customer loyalty through perceived ease of use and information sharing. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(4), 1155–1168. https://doi.org/qx6c
Stollfuß, S. (2021). The platformisation of public service broadcasting in Germany: The network ‘funk’ and the case of Druck/Skam Germany. Critical Studies in Television, 16(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1449602021996536
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tiwary, I. (2024). Streaming and India’s film-centred video culture: Linguistic and formal diversity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/qx6d
Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Putra, G. W., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode systematic literature review untuk identifikasi platform dan metode pengembangan sistem informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528