A Genre and Collocational Analysis of Consequence, Result, and Outcome

Supakorn Phoocharoensil

Abstract


This corpus-based study examines genres and collocation patterns in which the three synonyms ‘consequence’, ‘result’, and ‘outcome’ usually occur. The data on which the study is based is derived from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Of all the eight genres currently available in COCA, the three synonyms appear with the highest frequency in academic texts, whereas frequencies are lowest in informal genres, i.e. TV and movie subtitles and fiction. Of pedagogical concern is the fact that the common verb and adjective collocates repeatedly co-occur with the synonymous nouns. Determined by the COCA frequency and the MI value (≥ 3), ‘consequence’ is often used with verbs and adjectives conveying negative senses, and the typical collocates of ‘result’ has a clear association with research-oriented contexts. The collocates of ‘outcome’ have the broadest variety of semantic properties but are not directly related to any specific contexts. It is highly recommended that EFL teachers apply this genre and collocational information to synonym development lessons.

 

Keywords:  synonym; genre; distribution across genres; collocation; adjective and verb collocates


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ang, L. H., Tan, K. H., & He, M. Y. (2017). A Corpus-based Collocational Analysis of Noun Premodification Types in Academic Writing. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(1), 115–135. doi: 10.17576/3l-2017-2301-09

Aroonmanakun, V. (2015). ‘Quick’ or ‘fast’: A corpus-based study of English synonyms. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 8(1), 53-62.

Barnbrook, G, Mason, O. & Krishnamurthy, R. (2013). Collocation. Applications and implications. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cheng, W. (2012). Exploring corpus linguistics. Language in action. London: Routledge.

Chung, S-F. (2011). A corpus analysis of ‘create’ and ‘produce’. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 4(2), 399-425

Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly. 34(2), 213-238.

Crawford, W. J. & Csomay, E. (2016). Doing corpus linguistics. London: Routledge.

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davies, M. (2020, June 25). The new corpus of contemporary American English (COCA 2020). Language Institute Thammasat University (LITU) Webinar, Bangkok, Thailand.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW9I9C9rPD4

Flowerdew, L. (2012). Corpora and language education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hill, J. (2000). Revisiting priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.). Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 47-69).

London: Commercial Colour Press Plc.

Jackson, H. & Amvela, E. (2007). Words, meaning, and vocabulary: An introduction to modern English lexicology. London: Cassel.

Jirananthiporn, S. (2018). Is this problem giving you trouble? A corpus-based examination of the differences between the nouns ‘problem’ and ‘trouble’. Thoughts 2018. 2, 1-25.

Lee, C. & Liu, J. (2009). Effects of collocation information on learning lexical semantics for near Synonym distinction. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing. 14(2),

-220

Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? In M. Baker et al. (Eds). Text and technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Longman advanced American dictionary. (2013). Essex: Pearson Education.

Ly, T. H. & Jung, C. K. (2015). A corpus investigation: The similarities and differences of ‘cute’, ‘pretty’ and ‘beautiful’. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 21(3),

-140. http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/8788/3426

Merriam-Webster dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/

Oxford advanced American dictionary. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/

Petcharat, N. & Phoocharoensil, S. (2017). A corpus-based study of English synonyms:‘appropriate’, ‘proper’, and ‘suitable’. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research

Network. 10(2), 90-99.

Phoocharoensil, S. (2010). A corpus-based study of English synonyms. International Journal of Arts and Sciences. 3(10), 227-245.

Schmitt, N. (2010). Research vocabulary. A vocabulary research manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text. London: Routledge.

Sridhanyarat, K. (2018). Thai learners’ acquisition of L2 collocations: An interlanguage perspective. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(1), 1-21.

Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of trouble with quantitative studies. Functions and language. 2(1), 23-55.

Szudarski, P. (2018). Corpus linguistics for vocabulary: A guide for research. London: Routledge.

Taylor, J. (2002). Near synonyms as co-extensive categories: ‘high’ and ‘tall’ revisited. Language Sciences. 25(3), 263-284.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.

Webb, S. & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wongkhan, P. & Thienthong, A. (2020). EFL learners’ acquisition of academic collocation and synonymy: Does their academic experience matter? RELC Journal. March 2020, 1-16.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157