One of the concerns of Cognitive Poetic critics has been with the issue of how literary authors make meaning by means of metaphor. Building on the Cognitive Linguistic theories of metaphor, the field of Cognitive Poetics has been concerned, among its many diverse areas, with the studying of metaphor in literary texts. Proposing the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), cognitive linguists George Lakoff and Mark Johnson argued in Metaphors We Live By that our conceptual system is metaphorically shaped. In addition, they claimed that the metaphoric linguistic expressions are the manifestation of the fundamental conceptual metaphors forming individuals' cognitions. Conceptual metaphors were defined as the underlying structures of these expressions by means of which people comprehend intangible concepts through more tangible ones. Using the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), the present essay explores the conceptual metaphor of LIFE IS A PLAY in David Mamet's Sexual Perversity in Chicago and Glengarry Glen Ross. In these plays, Mamet depicts a world in which performance, in its theatrical sense, becomes the characters' survival strategy and a manner of living. As one of the most influential playwrights of his time, Mamet has always been concerned with the issues which most afflict America. He finds the ills of his society manifested in the relation among people. An attempt is made to explain the ways in which life-as-play finds expression both linguistically and thematically in the different contexts of these works.

Keywords: cognitive poetics; metaphor; conceptual metaphor ;David Mamet; Sexual Perversity in Chicago; Glengarry Glen Ross

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2202-05

Brone, G, and Jeroen Vandaele. (2009). Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Bigsby, Ch. (2004a). David Mamet. In Christopher Bigsby (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet (pp 1-40). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

---. David Mamet: All True Stories. (2004b). In Harold Bloom (Ed.). David Mamet (pp 163-201). Philadelphia: Chelsea House.

---. David Mamet's Fiction. (2004c). In Christopher Bigsby (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet (pp 194-219). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Bloom, H. (2004). Introduction. In Harold Bloom (Ed.). David Mamet (pp 1-3). Philadelphia: Chelsea House.

Callens, J. (2004). The 1970s. In Christopher Bigsby (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet (pp 41-56). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Dean, A. (1992). David Mamet: Language as Dramatic Action. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson.

Freeman, M. H. (2002). Cognitive Mapping in Literary Analysis. Cognitive Approaches to Figurative Language. Vol. 36. No. 3, 466-483.

Gavins, J, and Gerard Steen. (2003). Contextualizing Cognitive Poetics. In Joanna Gavins and Gerard Steen (Eds.). Cognitive Poetics in Practice (pp 1-12). London: Routledge.

Geeraerts, D, and Hubert Cuyckens. (2007). Introduction. In Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuckens. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp 3-21). Oxford: Oxford UP.

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Oxford UP.

---. (2005). Metaphor in Culture Universality and Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.

Lakoff, G, and Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: U of Chicago.

Lakoff, G, and Mark Turner. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: U of Chicago.

Mamet, D. (1984). Glengarry Glen Ross: A Play. NY: Grove.

---. (1987). Sexual Perversity in Chicago and the Duck Variations: Two Plays. N.Y.: Grove.

---. (2000). Three Uses of the Knife: on the Nature and Purpose of Drama. N.Y.: Vintage Books.

---. (2013). Plays 4: Oleanna, The Cryptogram, The Old Neighborhood. London: Bloomsbury.

Murphy, B. (2011). Understanding David Mamet. Columbia: U of South Carolina.

Nightingale, B. (2004). Glengarry Glen Ross. In Christopher Bigsby (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet (pp 89-102). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Punter, D. (2007). Metaphor. London: Routledge.

Quinn, M. L. (2004). Anti-Theatricality and American Ideology: Mamet’s Performative Realism. In Harold Bloom (Ed.). David Mamet (pp 93-110).Philadelphia: Chelsea House.

Schvey, H. I. (2001). Celebrating the Capacity for Self-knowledge. In Leslie Kane (Ed.). David Mamet in Conversation (pp 60-71). Ann Arbor: U of Michigan.

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, G. W. H. (2006). Erving Goffman. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Spears, R. A. (2000). NTC's Dictionary of American Slang and Colloquial Expressions. 3rd ed. Lincolnwood (Chicago), Ill.: NTC Pub. Group.

States, B. O. (1996). Performance as Metaphor. Theater Journal, Vol. 48. No. 1, 1-26.

Steen, G. (2009). From Linguistic Form to Conceptual Structure in Five Steps: Analyzing Metaphor in Poetry. In Geert Brone and Jeroen Vandaele (Eds.). Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps (pp 197-226). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Steen, G, and Joanna Gavins. (2003). Contextualizing Cognitive Poetics. In Gerard Steen and Joanna Gavins (Eds.). Cognitive Poetics in Practice (pp.1-12). London: Routledge.

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

Turner, M. (2002). The Cognitive Study of Art, Language and Literature. Poetics Today. Vol 23.No. 1, 9-20.