Vocabulary is of vital importance for EFL learners particularly for its major contribution to reading comprehension. The lack of necessary support for learning vocabulary effectively explains why EFL university learners still have limited vocabulary knowledge. The integration of computer technology has offered language teachers and learners a variety of tools to assist in developing pedagogical practices and language learning. One of these tools is corpora, also known as data-driven learning (DDL). The purpose of this study is to examine whether DDL instruction has a significant effect on developing EFL Yemeni learners’ words meaning as well as the collocation of receptive vocabulary knowledge compared to the dictionary use. The participants in this study were 60 female second level English language students who were divided into an experimental group (DDL group) and a control group (dictionary group). The findings from the pretest result demonstrated comparability of the two groups in two aspects of vocabulary knowledge. However, the results from the posttest and the delayed posttest showed that the learning outcomes of the DDL group were significantly higher than the dictionary group. The study findings confirmed the substantial short and long term effects of DDL instructional method on vocabulary learning. Based on the study results, there is a great need for raising teachers’ and learners’ awareness of the effectiveness of the DDL method particularly in a Yemeni context where corpus use is still a novel method for learning. 

Keywords: Receptive vocabulary; meaning; collocation; corpus; data driven learning

Al Saeed, N. & Waly, S. (2010). Corpus for classrooms: Ideas for material design. Proceedings of the 10th METU ELT Convention.

Ayas, C. (2006). An examination of the relationship between the integration of technology into social studies and constructivist pedagogies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 5(1), 14-25

Azman, H., Bhooth, A. B. & Ismail, K. (2013). Readers reading practices of EFL Yemeni students: recommendations for the 21st century. Gema Online® Journal of Language Studies. 13(3), 63-78.

Bahooth, A. M., Azman, H, & Ismail, K. (2014). Investigating the reading practices of EFL Yemeni students using the learning by design framework. TESOL Journal. 1-29

Bernardini, S. 2004. Corpora in classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In Sinclair, how to use corpora in language teaching (pp 15-36). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.

Boulton, A. (2009a). Data-driven learning: on paper, in practice. Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching.17-52.

Boulton, A. (2009b). Data- driven learning: reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian journal of applied linguistics. Vol 35 (1), 1-28.

Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning. 60(3), 534–572.

Chen, K. Y. 2011. The impact of EFL students’ vocabulary breadth of knowledge on literal reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal. 51, 30- 40.

Chujo, K., Anthony, L., Oghigian, K., & Uchibori, A. (2012). Paper based- computer based, and combined data driven learning using a web based concordancer. Language education in Asia. 3(2), 132-145.

Davies, M. (2008) The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 425 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://www.americancorpus.org.

Decarrico, J. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M.Celce-Murcia (ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed) (pp 285- 300). Heinle & Heinle: Boston.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic books.

Gardner, D. & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics. 35 (3), 305-327.

Gabrielatos, C. (2005). Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? Teaching English as a Second Language. Electronic Journal. 8(4), 1-35.

Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on-line database. Language learning & technology, Vol 9(2), 90-110.

Jafarpour, A. A. & Koosha, M., (2006). Data-driven learning and teaching collocation of prepositions: The case of Iranian EFL adult learners. Asian EFL Journal. 8(4), 129-209.

Jalilifar, A., Mehrabi, K. & Mousavinia, S, Z. (2014). The effect of concordance enriched instruction on the vocabulary learning and retention of Iranian EFL learners. International Conference on Current Trends in ELT.

Johns, T. (1990). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data driven learning. CALL Austria. 10, 14-34.

Kameli, S. & Baki, R, Bin. (2013). The impact of vocabulary knowledge level on EFL reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 2 (1), 85-89.

Kameli, S. Mustafa, G. & Alyami, S. 2013. The predictor factor of reading comprehension performance in English as a forging language: Breadth or depth. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 2(2),179-184.

Kheirzadeh, S. & Tavakoli, E. 2012. The causes of reading difficulty: The perception of Iranian post-graduate and under-graduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 3(1), 147-152

Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: words you don’t know, words you think you know and words you can’t guess. In J.

Coady and T. Huckin (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. pp. 20-34.New York. Cambridge University Press.

Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics. 22(1), 1-26.

Lin, Z. (2002). Discovering EFL learners' perception of the prior knowledge and its roles in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading. 25(2),172-190.

Liu, S., & Ma, Z. (2011). An Empirical Study on Concordance-based English Collocation Teaching. I.J. Education and Management Engineering. 1(4), 46-52.

Ma, Q. & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 19(1), 15-45.

Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S. A. & Kian, P. (2011). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning. 53 (222), 97-127.

Mirzaii, M. (2012). Implicit Vs. Explicit Vocabulary Learning: Which Approach Serves Long-term Recall Better? The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, Vol18 (2), 1-12.

Mvududu, N. H. & Thiel-Burgess, J. (2012). Constructivism in Practice: The Case for English Language Learners. International Journal of Education. 4(3), 108-118.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook and research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 581-595). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nezami, S, R. (2012). A critical study of comprehension strategies and general problems in reading skill faced by Arab EFL learners with special reference to Najran University in Saudi Arabia. International J. Soc. Sci. & Education. 2(3), 306-316.

Poole, R. (2012). Concordance-based glosses for academic vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, Vol 29(4), 679-693.

Saeidi, M. (2009). The implementation of multiple intelligences theory in the classroom: Different ways of learning and teaching. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature. 1 (1), 103-116.

Sadeghi, K. & Nobakht, A. (2014). The effect of linguistic context on EFL vocabulary learning. GEMA; Online Journal of Language Studies. Vol14 (3), 65-82.

Sripicharn, P. (2003). Evaluating classroom concordancing: The use of concordance-based materials by a group of Thai students. Thammasat Review. 8(1), 203–236.

Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities. 6, 13-31.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. London: Longman.

Ucar, S. & Yukselir, C. (2015). The effect of corpus-based activities on verb-noun collocations in EFL classes. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 14 (2), 195- 205.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Woo Y. & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and higher education. 10(1), 15-25.