Citation, as a central and integral issue in academic writing, has been the focus of many recent scholarly articles to highlight the significant role of this discursive practice in the realm of research article writing. Nonetheless, most of the previous studies, with notable exceptions, examined disciplinary influences on citation practices independently of ethnolinguistic influences, and vice versa. The present study investigates the doubly contrastive language-discipline perspective on the one hand and draws a distinction between disciplinary cultures and national cultures on the other. A corpus of 240 research articles sampled from leading Persian and English language medium journals of applied linguistics and psychology as representatives of soft sciences, and computer engineering and mechanical engineering as representatives of hard sciences, was examined drawing on Coffin’s (2009) integrative analytic framework. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the several aspects of citation features of Bakhtinian dialogism demonstrated some cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic similarities and differences. Pedagogical implications derived from these findings are discussed.

Keywords: Citations; Persian and English Academic writing; writer stance; author integration; textual integration

Ange´lil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen Words? Plagiarism in Writing. Harlow: Longman.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Articles in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Borg, E. (2000). Citation practices in academic writing. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice (pp. 27-45). Reading: University of Reading.

Coffin, C. (2009). Incorporating and evaluating voices in a film studies thesis. Writing and Pedagogy. Vol. 1, 163-193.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

Connor, U.M. & Moreno, A.L. (2005). Tertium comparationis: A vital component in contrastive rhetoric research. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson,

W. G. Eggington,W. Grabe & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honor of Robert B. Kaplan (pp. 153-164). Clevedon, Uk: Multilingual Matters.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Flottum, K., Dahl, T. & Kinn, T. (2006). Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. Amesterdam, the Netherlands : John Benjamins.

Fuoli, M. (2012). Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of appraisal in BP;s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication. Vol. 6(1), 55-81.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Beacon Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd Edition). London: Edward Arnold.

Hu, G. & Wang, G. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 14, 14-28.

Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistic. Vol. 20, 341-367.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and Engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistic. Vol. 23(2), 215-239.

Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching. Vol. 46, 53-70.

Jalilifar, A. & Dabbi, R. (2012). Citation in applied linguistics: Analysis of introduction sections of Iranian master's theses. Linguistic Online. Vol. 57(7), 91-104.

Kamyabi, A., Ghonsooly, B. & Mahdavi, E. (2014). A Contrastive Study of Rhetorical Functions of Citation in Iranian and International ELT Scopus Journals. Linguistics and Literature Studies. Vol. 2(6), 155-165.

Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English. In Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (Eds.), Evaluation in Text. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Nguyen, L. T. T. & Pramoolsook, I. (2016). Citation Practice in the Whole Tesol Master’s Theses by Vietnamese postgraduates. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 22(3), 79-92.

Nguyen,L. T. T. & Pramoolsook, I. (2016). Citations in Literature Review Chapters of TESOL Master’s Theses by Vietnamese Postgraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 16(2), 17-32

Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 25(1), 4-29.

Petric, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citation in high-and-low rated master's these. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 238-253.

Shooshtari, Z. G. & Jalilifar, A. (2010). Citation and the construction of

disciplinary knowledge. Journal of Teaching Language Skills. Vol. 2(1), 45–66.

Small, H. (2010). Referencing through history: how the analysis of landmark scholarly texts can inform citation theory. Research Evaluation. Vol. 19,185-193.

Soler-Monreal, C. & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD theses. International Journal of English Studies.

Vol. 11 (2), 53-75.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CPU.

Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 12, 305-382.

Thompson, P. & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning and Technology. Vol. 5(3), 91–10.

Thompson, P. (2005). “Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD Theses”. English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 4, 307-323.

White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 25, 89-116.

White, P. R. R. (2001). An introductory tour through Appraisal Theory [Online]. Retrieved from www.grammatics.com /Appraisal/AppraisalOutline/AppraisalOutline.doc

White, P. R. R (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text. Vol. 23, 259-284.