The reading experience of those who are literate in more than one language is highly complex. This makes the reading experience a phenomenon that is not easily understood. Yet, in Malaysia’s education policy, reading goals are subsumed under language learning goals. Such implicit ways of assuming that literacy occurs through language learning not only overlooks any impact language learning may have on literacy practice but also undermines the fact that learning to read in a language is ontologically different from reading through all or any language. This paper discusses a part of an in-depth qualitative study which scrutinized the reading experiences of eight multiliterate Malaysian undergraduates studying in a British university in order to understand the difference between being literate in many languages and choosing to read through any one language. The contrast between multilingual Malaysia and monolingual England formed an important backdrop. In this study, the phenomenological interview and diary-writing were used as research methods to capture the participants’ past reading experience as Malaysian school students and as British university undergraduates. Phenomenographic analysis and discourse analysis were used to analyse the data. Findings from this study suggest that multilingual readers experience “language-ness” because of the specificities of multiple language learning. The phenomenon of language-ness then go on to influence the habituation and sustenance of reading choice across different languages. This paper suggests that as linguistically-diverse countries forge ahead to maintain its citizens’ linguistic abilities, they must not forget that linguistic capital alone cannot shape a nation. Semiotic capital which relates to meaning-making is also critical in shaping an informed nation. This study has important implications towards contemporary discourse about Literacies, language and the reading experience.

Keywords: multiliteracy; reading; language-ness; meaning-making; policy

Asmah Haji Omar (Ed.). (2016). Languages in the Malaysian Education System. New York: Routledge.

Bajunid, I. A. (2016). Indigenous knowledge dissemination - still not there. Paper presented at the Asia Leadership Roundtable, Singapore. https://www.eduhk.hk/apclc/roundtable2016 /paper/PaperProf.%20Ibrahim%20Ahmad%20BAJUNID.pdf

Baynham, M. (1988). Literate, biliterate, multiliterate? Some issues for literacy research. In J. McCaffery & B. V. Street (Eds.), Literacy Research in the U.K. (pp. 51-63). Lancaster: RaPAL.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of Research: a phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 26(3).

Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of Reading Development. New York: McGraw Hill.

Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A. & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). Reading Crisis: Why Poor Children Fall Behind. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

Chong, S. L. (2011). A study of Malaysian undergraduates' motivation for reading. (Master in Philosophy unpublished thesis), University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Chong, S. L. (2016). Re-thinking aliteracy: When undergraduates surrender their reading choices. Literacy. Vol. 50(1), 14-22.

Cliff Hodges, G. (2016). Researching and Teaching Reading: Developing Pedagogy through Critical Inquiry. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Commissaire, E., Duncan, L. G. & Casalis, S. (2011). Cross-language transfer of orthographic processing skills: A study of French children who learn English at school. Journal of Research in Reading. Vol. 34(1), 59-76.

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies. London: Routledge.

Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy Education in School: Research Perspectives From the Past, for the Future. Victoria: ACER Press Australian Council for Educational Research.

Gee, J. P. (2000). New people in new worlds: networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies (pp. 43-68). London: Routledge.

Gee, J. P. (2008). Social Linguistics and Literacies. Oxon: Routledge.

Gogolin, I. (2013). Bildungssprache - a case of multiliteracies and multimodalities. In M. Böck & N. Pachler (Eds.), Multimodality and Social Semiosis: Communication, Meaning-Making, and Learning in the Work of Gunther Kress (Vol. 6, pp. 130-140). New York: Routledge.

Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.). (2003). Continua of Biliteracy: an Ecological Framework for Educational Policy, Research and Practice in Multilingual Settings. Great Britain: Cromwell Press Ltd.

Hornberger, N. H. & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: a biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Vol. 15(3), 261-278. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2012.658016

Kachru, B. B. (1998). English as an Asian language. Links & Letters. Vol. 5, 89-108.

Kadir, S. A. S. (2003). Experience and Efforts in Literacy Programmes: Brief Country Report. Kuala Lumpur: Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.

Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E. & Dalley-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies (2nd ed.). Australia: Cambridge University Press.

Koo, Y. L. (2006). Exploring Pluriliteracy As Theory and Practice in Multilingual/Cultural Contexts. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 11, 79-98.

http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/1100

Kress, G. R. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and Designs of Social Futures (pp. 182-202). London: Routledge.

Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Oxon: Taylor & Francis.

Luke, A. (2003). Literacy and the Other: A Sociological Approach to Literacy Research and Policy in Multilingual Societies. Reading Research Quarterly. Vol. 38(1), 132-141.

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science. Vol. 10, 177-200.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Kuala Lumpur.

Mozihim, A. K. (2010). On reading habits of Malaysian students, Daily Express. Retrieved from http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/read.cfm?NewsID=370

Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Lam, K., Luo, Y. C. & Ramirez, G. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading. Vol. 34(1), 23–42.

Puteh, M., Mohd Zin, Z. & Ismail, I. (2016). Reading Performance of Malaysian Students across Gender in PISA 2012. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 22(2), 109-121.

Raslie, H. & Keong, Y. C. (2017). Literacy Brokering among the International Students of a Public University. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 17(1), 1-19.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (2005). Making Meaning With Texts: Selected Essays. Heinemann Educational Books.

Rothbauer, P. M., Skjerdingstad, K. I., McKechnie, L. & Oterholm, K. (Eds.). (2016). Plotting the Reading Experience: Theory/Practice/Politics. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

Special Eurobarometer 243. (2006). Europeans and their Languages. The European Commission.

The New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies (pp. 9-37). London: Routledge.

Vale, A. P. (2011). Orthographic context sensitivity in vowel decoding by Portuguese monolingual and Portuguese–English bilingual children. Journal of Research in Reading. Vol. 34(1), 43-58.

Wyse, D., Andrews, R. & Hoffman, J. (Eds.). (2010). The Routledge International Handbook of English, Language and Literacy Teaching. London: Routledge.