This article investigates the meaning construction processes of novel figurative expressions found in the discourse on the US legalisation of same-sex marriage. It is argued that mental spaces theory and conceptual blending theory (MSCB) can be of great analytical benefits when dealing with this type of data. Four cases of novel figurative spaces and blends, namely the Divided Self construal, the Generic is Specific construal, the single-scope blending, and the megablending, are examined to shed light on how same-sex marriage controversies are conceptualised by means of the viewpointed nature of figurative language. In addition, based on the analyses of the four selected cases, this article ends with a discussion on why MSCB is an appropriate choice for examining novel figurative expressions in discourse.

Keywords: figurative language; mental spaces; conceptual blending; meaning construction; same-sex marriage

Abas, N. & Kaur, S. (2019). Theologising the discourse of representation through ‘faith’ and religion in football news. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 25(3), 150 – 162.

Dancygier, B. (2012). The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dancygier, B. (2016). Figurativeness, conceptual metaphor, and blending. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language

(pp. 28-41). Abingdon: Routledge.

Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, M. (2013). Corpus of news on the web (NOW): 3+ billion words from 20 countries, updated every day. Available at https://corpus.byu.edu/now/.

Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. (2nd ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.

Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. (2007). Mental spaces. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 371–376). Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the

Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Hung, B. P. (2019) A cognitive linguistic approach to teaching English idioms to EFL students: Experimental results. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English

Language Studies. Vol. 25(2), 113 – 126.

Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics. Vol. 28(2), 321–347.

Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). Spaces, Worlds, and

Grammar (pp. 91-123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

MacMillan Dictionary Online [online]. Available at: https://www.macmillandictionary.com. [Accessed December 28, 2018].

McGlone, M. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor?. Language and Communication. Vol. 27, 109-126.

Oakley, T & Coulson, S. (2008). Connecting the dots: Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In Oakley, T & Hougaard, A. (Eds.) Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 27-50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Pragglejaz Group 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol. Vol. 22(1), 1-39.

Rayson, P (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. Vol. 13(4), 519-549.

Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Vol. 104, 192-233.

Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.). Studies in Cross-linguistic Psychology (pp. 1-49). London: Academic Press.

Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 84-108).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sullivan, K. & Sweetser, E. (2009). Is “generic is specific” a metaphor?. In F. Parrill, V. Tobin & M. Turner (Eds.). Meaning, Form, and Body (pp. 309-328). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 309-328.

Wilson, A. & Thomas, J. (1997). Semantic annotation. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.). Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Texts (pp. 55-65). London: Longman.