War poetry functions not only as an aesthetic form but also as a psychological medium that processes trauma, reinforces identity, and motivates communities. Yet, research on classical Arabic and Old English war poetry has focused primarily on historical and rhetorical aspects, with limited attention to psycholinguistic dimensions. This gap restricts a deeper understanding of how poetic language operates as a psychological instrument for coping with war trauma across cultural traditions. This study aims (i) to analyse the emotional, cognitive, and therapeutic dimensions of Kaʿb ibn Mālik's poetry on the Battle of Uhud (625 CE) and the anonymous Old English poem The Battle of Maldon (991 CE); (ii) to compare their linguistic strategies; and (iii) to evaluate how poetic discourse shapes collective identity and resilience. A qualitative comparative textual analysis was employed. The findings reveal five dominant themes: trauma and grief, heroism and courage, loyalty and solidarity, collective motivation, and spiritual or feudal honour. Despite differing cultural contexts, both texts transform defeat into resilience through repetition, metaphor, rhythm, and parallelism. Ultimately, this research illuminates how poetic language—ancient or modern—functions as linguistic therapy for communities facing conflict, reaffirming its enduring relevance to both cultural and psychological resilience.

Keywords: Psycholinguistics; War poetry; Comparative literature; The Battle of Uhud; The Battle of Maldon

Al-‘Ani, S. M. (1990). Kaʿab bin Mālik al-Ansari: Shaʿir al-ʿAqidah al-Islamiyyah (2nd ed.). Dimashq: Dar al-Qalam.

Al-ʿAni, S. M. (1966). Diwan Kaʿb bin Mālik. Baghdad: Dar al-Rashid.

Al-Jarim, A. (n.d.). Shaʿir al-Islam: Kaʿab bin Malik. al-Qahirah: Maktabat al-Adab.

Alosman, M. I. (2024). Whose death is to be grieved? A comparative approach to contemporary war literature. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature – The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(1), 1–15. https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/view/67528

Al-Ukaydi, A., & Abdulrahman, A. (2019). Intertextual strategies in early Islamic poetry. Journal of Arabic Literary Studies, 8(2), 77–95.

Awad Allah, W. M. (2018). الصورة الفنية في شعر كعب بن مالك [The artistic imagery in the poetry of Kaʿb ibn Malik] (master’s thesis). Al-Aqsa University.

Brown, A. (2012). The Battle of Maldon. Retrieved from https://www.maldon.gov.uk/info/200136/about_the_district/318/the_battle_of_maldon

Cavill, P. (1998). Maxims in The Battle of Maldon. Neophilologus, 82(4), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004383411733

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

Clark, G. (2000). The Battle of Maldon: Fiction and fact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crossley-Holland, K., & Mitchell, B. (Eds.). (1967). The Battle of Maldon and other Old English poems. London: Macmillan.

Edam, B. K., Shaari, A. H., & Aladdin, A. (2024). The representation of Arab women in English-language newspapers: A comparative analysis of Arab and Western media post-Arab Spring. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature – The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(1), 110–130.

https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/view/63435

Farhan, B. H. (2020). تَعالُق النص القرآني في شعر كعب بن مالك الأنصاري [The Qur’anic intertextuality in the poetry of Kaʿb ibn Mālik al-Anṣārī]. Majallat al-Turāth al-ʿIlmī al-ʿArabī, 1(44), 1–20.. https://doi.org/10.54721/jrashc.1.44.594

Farhan, J. (2025). Representations of expressive realism in the poetry of kaab bin mālik al-ansari (50 or 51 ah.). Anbar University Journal of Languages & Literature, 17(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.37654/aujll.2025.155083.1102

Fauziati, E. (2011). Psycholinguistics: An introduction. Surakarta: Pustaka Utama.

Ferreira, F. (2025a). Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192886774.001.0001

Ferreira, F. (2025b). The relationship between psychology and linguistics. Psiholìngvìstika, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192886774.003.0001

Field, J. (2003). Psycholinguistics: The key concepts. London: Routledge.

Ganguly, I. (2021). Psycholinguistics. International Journal of English Learning and Teaching Skills, 3(4), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.15864/ijelts.3409

Garcés Conejos, P., & Fernández Cuesta, J. (1994). The Battle of Maldon y St Edmund: Una aproximación pragmática desde la teoría de la cortesía lingüística. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 15, 235–262. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=193720

Gitau, L. W., Arop, A., & Lenette, C. (2023). “My Dad Was, Is a Soldier”: Using collaborative poetic inquiry to explore intergenerational trauma, resilience, and wellbeing in the context of forced migration. Social Sciences, 12(8), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080455

Gordon, E. V. (1937). The Battle of Maldon. London: Methuen.

Hamid, T., & Nordin, R. (2011). Fallujah battles: violations of the international humanitarian law. Uum Journal of Legal Studies, 2. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.2.2011.4543

Hamka, I., & Safian, N. (2022). Images of heroism in the poetry of ka’ab bin mālik and mustofa bisri. Al-Irfan Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies, 5(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.36835/alirfan.v5i1.497

Harris, N. (2021). The Lion in Medieval Western Europe: Toward an Interpretive History. Traditio, 76, 143–182. Cambridge University Press. https://jurnal.pbmitt.org.my/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/000-Kulit-Depan-Jurnal-Al-Anwar-2022.pdf

The Heraldry Society. (2020). The Origin of the Royal Arms of England — A European Connection. Retrieved from https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/articles/the-origin-of-the-royal-arms-of-england-a-european-connection/

Hugentobler, A., & Lüdtke, J. (2021). Micropoetry meets neurocognitive poetics: Influence of associations on the reception of poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 737756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756

Ismaʿil, B. S. (2019). Dāliyat Kaʿb ibn Mālik al-Khazrajī al-Anṣārī: A critical study [دالية كعب بن مالك الخزرجي الأنصاري دراسة نقدية]. Majallat Ādāb al-Farāhīdī, Jāmiʿat Tikrīt, 9, 1–20. https://search.mandumah.com/Record/1110718

Klochek, H., & Foka, M. (2022). The Interaction of Receptive Poetics and Psycholinguistics: On the Way to the Synergetic Effect. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(3), 1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.09

Matlasevych, T., Balashov, A., & Kotovska, S. (2023). Emotive and metacognitive processes in post-traumatic growth of university students. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10(2), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.2.33

Niles, J. D. (2019). Old English heroic poetry and the comitatus ideal. Anglo-Saxon England, 48, 101–125.

Nursafira Lubis Safian, Nurul Iman Mohamad Anuar Kamal, & Muhammad Abu al-Fadhl Hasan. (2024). The use of figurative language in the poetry of prophetic expeditions by Kaʿab bin Mālik: An analytical study. Journal of Linguistic and Literary Studies, 15(1), 187–203.

https://journals.iium.edu.my/arabiclang/index.php/jlls/article/view/1104

Nurul Iman Mohamad Anuar Kamal, & Nursafira Lubis Safian. (2022). An analytical study on the biography of Kaʿab bin Mālik, the poet of the Prophet’s (PBUH) battles. Jurnal Al-Anwar, 11(2), 131–149.

Nurul Iman Mohamad Anuar Kamal, & Nursafira Lubis Safian. (2024). Figura heroisme Islam melalui puisi perang Kaʿab bin Mālik. International Journal of West Asian Studies, 16, 92–101. https://ejournal.ukm.my/ijwas/article/view/82331

Nurul Iman Mohamad Anuar Kamal, Nursafira Lubis Safian, & Aida Hayati Mohd Sanadi. (2025). Interaksi alam dengan manusia menurut perspektif ekokritik dalam puisi perang Kaʿab bin Mālik. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences, 8(2), 300–314.

https://bitarajournal.com/index.php/bitarajournal/article/view/701

Pakis, V. A. (2011). Insults, violence, and the meaning of lytegian in the Old English Battle of Maldon. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 12(1), 198–229. https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.12.1-2.09PAK

Palermo, D. S., & Aydogan, H. (1978). Psychology of language. New York: Academic Press. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA06576271

Paz, J. (2014). The rhetoric of war and trauma in Old English poetry. Anglo-Saxon England Studies, 43, 75–98.

Phillips, H. (1997). The order of words and patterns of opposition in The Battle of Maldon. Neophilologus, 81(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004225620340

Pons-Sanz, S. M. (2008). Norse-derived terms and structures in The Battle of Maldon. Retrieved from https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/9116v/norse-derived-terms-and-structures-in-the-battle-of-maldon

Qabayli, H. D. (2015). جماليات الصورة الشعرية في أشعار الغزوات النبوية عند كعب بن مالك الأنصاري [The aesthetics of poetic imagery in the prophetic battle poems of Kaʿb ibn Mālik al-Anṣārī]. Majallat al-ʿUlūm al-Insāniyyah, Jāmiʿat al-Ikhwah Mentouri Qusanṭīnah, 26(3), 441–460. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/36563

Rasse, C., Onysko, A., & Citron, F. M. M. (2020). Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: A psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition, 12(2), 310–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.47

Roy, D. (n.d.). Psycholinguistics. International Journal of English Learning and Teaching Skills, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15864/ijelts.2114

Scragg, D. G. (Ed.). (1991). The Battle of Maldon AD 991. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Spencer, S. J. (2017). The Legends of King Richard I “Coeur de Lion”. King’s College London.

Tatlılıoğlu, K., & Senchylo-Tatlılıoğlu, N. (2020). A theoretical perspective on psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 15, 241–245. https://doi.org/10.31470/2706-7904-2020-15-241-245

Zasiekina, L., Kennison, S., & Khvorost, K. (2023). Psycholinguistic markers of autobiographical and traumatic memory. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10(2), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2019.6.2.zas

Zhirenov, S., Nurekeshova, G., & Nursultankyzy, Z. (2023). Psycholinguistic character of emotional and expressive units of poetic texts. Bulletin of the Eurasian Humanities Institute, Philology Series, 2, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.55808/1999-4214.2023-2.04