Breaking Supervisor-Student Trust: Perspectives of Students

Abstract

Some supervisors do not treat students well and this impacts on trust which can be viewed as a cornerstone for the supervision. The supervisor-student trust is a fragile element of supervision, if not handled with care it can break and thus bringing supervision relationship to and end. Hence supervisors and student should clearly understand their roles in sustaining trust so that they can mould it accordingly. This paper sought to explore issues that can break trust between supervisors and students. It was framed qualitatively and employed semi-structured interviews for data generation. Five themes emerged from analysis of findings. These themes were dehumanising pedagogy/behaviour, treating students as tabula rasa, incompetent supervisor, lack of understanding between the supervisor and co-supervisor and harshness. This paper concludes that some supervisors do not understand that students, as adults, have other responsibilities to take care of on top of the study and some supervisors are not patient with students and that affects trust. Therefore, this paper recommends that supervisors and students discuss terms and conditions of the supervision process so that they clearly define expectations at the early stages of supervision.

Keywords: Relationship; student; supervisor; trust; perspectives

References

Almusaed, A., & Almusaed, A. (2020). “The role of the supervisor on developing PhD students’ skills”. In R. Thripp & I. Sahin (Eds.), Proceedings of iHSES 2020-- International Conference on Humanities, Social and Education Sciences (pp. 25-36). Washington Dc. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED626403.pdf.

Arambewela, R., & Hall, J. (2008). An empirical model of international student satisfaction. Asian Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(4), 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850910997599

Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. Methuen.

Bui, H. T. (2014). Student–supervisor expectations in the doctoral supervision process for business and management students. Business and Management Education in HE, 1(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.11120/bmhe.2014.00006

Cherry, K. (2022, December 05). What is self-esteem? https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-esteem-2795868

Chinyakata, R., Raselekoane, N. R., & Mphahlele, R. R. C. (2019). Factors contributing to postgraduate students working and studying simultaneously and its effects on their academic performance. African Renaissance, 16(1), 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.31920/2516-5305/2019/V16n1a4

Creswell, J.W. (2013b). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Denis, C., Colet, N.R., & Lison, C. (2019). Doctoral supervision in North America: Perception and challenges of supervisor and supervisee. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 30-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p30

Dube, M. C. (2021). Eight ways to erode supervisor-student trust. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(6), 130-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0134

Duschinsky, R. (2012). Tabula rasa and human nature. Philosophy, 87(4), 509-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819112000393

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Falender, C. A., Erickson Cornish, J. A., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N. J., & Leventhal, G. (2004). Toward an effective signature pedagogy for psychology: Comments supporting the case for competent supervisors. Psychology, 60, 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20013

Frowe, I. (2005). Professional trust. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 34-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00282.x

Gaya, H. J., & Smith, E. E. (2016). Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic management realm: An appropriate research design. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(2), 529-538.

Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 42, 266-290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3

George, T. (22 June 2023). Semi-structured interview | Definition, guide & examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/semi-structured-interview/

Guccione, K. (2018). Trust me! Building and breaking professional trust in doctoral student-supervisor relationships. Project Report. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education: United Kingdom. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/trust-me-building-and-breaking-professional-trust-doctoral-student-supervisor

Hendricks, S., Cartwright, D.J., & Cowden, R.G. (2021). Clinical supervision in South Africa: Perceptions of supervision training, practices, and professional competencies. South African Journal of Science, 117(3-4), 1-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/7428

Hope-Hailey, V., Searle, R., & Dietz, G. (2012). Organisational effectiveness: how trust helps. People Management, 30-35.

Hyett, N., Kenny, A. & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9, 23606. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.23606

Japheth, N., Ssentamu, P. N., Wambua, B. K., & Kurgat, S. J. (2023). Strategies used for effective research supervision in the completion of postgraduate studies in selected Universities of Uganda. Journal of the National Council for Higher Education, 10(2), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.58653/nche.v10i2.01

Khan, A., & Qayyum, A. (2019). Investigating the elements of supervision in library and information science practicums: a systematic literature review. Information Research, 24(3).

Kutsyuruba, B. (2021). The role of trust in doctoral student–supervisor relationships in Canadian Universities: The students' lived experiences and perspectives. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i2.4124

Le, M., Pham, L., Kim, K., & Bui, N. (2021). The impacts of supervisor – PhD student relationships on PhD students’ satisfaction: A case study of Vietnamese universities. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4), 1-18. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol18/iss4/18

Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933.

Lundh, P., Palmgren, P. J., & Stenfors, T. (2019). Perceptions about trust: A phenomenographic study of clinical supervisors in occupational therapy. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1850-1

Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020). “Semi-structured Interviews”. In: Zeigler-Hill V., Shackelford T.K. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_857

Määttä, K. (2015). A good supervisor-ten facts of caring supervision. International Education Studies, 8(9), 185-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n9p185

Masek, A.B. (2017). Establishing supervisor-students’ relationships through mutual expectation: A study from supervisors’ point of view. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 226(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012200

Moxham, L., Dwyer, T., & Reid-Searl, K. (2013). Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: Ensuring supervisor/student ‘best fit’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 345-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030

Nguyen, D. T., Wright, E. P., Dedding, C., Pham, T. T., & Bunders, J. (2019). Low self-esteem and its association with anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation in Vietnamese secondary school students: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00698

Pizzolato, D., & Dierickx, K. (2022). Research integrity supervision practices and institutional support: A qualitative study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09468-y
Polkinghorne, M., Taylor, J., Knight, F., & Stewart, N. (2023). Doctoral supervision: A best practice review. Encyclopedia, 3, 46-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010004

Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in socia.l science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884

Yang, B., Bao, S., & Xu, J. (2022) Supervisory styles and graduate student innovation performance: The mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of harmonious academic passion. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2022.1034216

Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155).

Zhao, Y., Zheng, Z., Pan, C., & Zhou, L. (2021) Self-esteem and academic engagement among adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690828