Contextual Layers in the Establishment of Research Niche in Doctoral Thesis Introductions by Malaysian Writers
Abstract
One of the key moves in thesis introductions in terms of Swales’s CARS is Move 2: Establishing the Niche. It is where researchers provide the justifications of the study after introducing the general area of the research. However, research findings of prior work have focused on thesis introductions which relates to how texts are constructed and organised in systematic ways in terms of Swales’s (1990) CARS moves and steps, and how these two organisational elements assist in achieving the overall purpose of the genre. These move analysis studies of Introductions do not examine and explain why each move and step are written the way they are through the lens of various contextual layers. The current study views genre through the Contrastive Rhetoric (CR) lens in looking at context as multilayered. The study examines how different levels of context influence how eight ESL Malaysian writers establish their research niche. Adopting the functional-semantic approach to analysis, it can be concluded that apart from the multi-layered discourse community of their academic setting, the socio-cultural and socio-political contexts have a significant effect on the establishments of the writers’ research niche.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, U. (1997). Research Article Introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an Emerging Research Community. In A. Duszak (Ed.). Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 104: Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse (pp. 273-303). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre Analysis: An Investigation of the Discussion Sections Of Applied Linguistics Research Articles. The Asian ESP Journal. 4(1), 39-63.
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2013). A move-based analysis of the conclusion sections of research articles published in international and Thai journals. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 19(2), 53-63.
Arulandu, M. (2005). Genre analysis of dissertation Introductions. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
Azman & Ahmad (2006). History, Trends, and Significant Development of Adult Education in Malaysia. Historia: Journal of Historical Studies. VII(2) , 66-82.
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic Moves in PhD Thesis Introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.). Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). London: Longman.
Burgess, Robert G. (2002). In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research. Routledge.
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5(1), 4-18.
Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Genre-mixing in Academic Introductions. English for Specific Purposes. 16(3), 181-195.
Cooley, L. & Lewkowicz. J. (1997). Developing Awareness of the Rhetorical and Linguistic Conventions of Writing a Thesis in English: Addressing the Needs of ESL/EFL Postgraduates Students. In A. Duszak (Ed.). Culture and Styles Of Academic Discourse (pp.113-140). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Connor, U. (1999). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U. (2008). Mapping Multidimensional Aspects of Research: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (Eds.). Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric (pp. 299-315). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Croker, R. A. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics (pp. 3-24). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Cruse, D. A. (2004). Lexical Facets and Metonymy. Ilha Do Desterro a Journal of English Language, Literatures in English And Cultural Studies. 47, 73-96.
Dong, Y.R. (1998). Non-native Speaker Graduate Students’ Thesis/dissertation Writing in Science: Self-reports by Students and their Advisors from Two U.S. Institutions’. English for Specific Purposes. 17, 369-390.
Dudley-Evans & St. John. (1998). Developments in ESP. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Duszak, A. (Ed.). (1997). Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse (Vol. 104). Walter de Gruyter.
Eason, C.A. (1995). Argumentative essays written by native speakers of Chinese and English: A study in contrastive rhetoric. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gow, L., Kember, D., & Chow, R. (1991). The Effects of English Language Ability on Approaches to Learning. RELC Journal. 22(1), 49-68.
Hammersley, M & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
Hashim, A. (2008). How to Write a Thesis: The Thesis Writing Journey from Start to Finish. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
Hinds, J. (1982). English and Japanese: A Contrastive Study (1978–1982). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 3, 78-84.
Hirose, K., & Sasaki, M. (1994). Explanatory Variables for Japanese Students' Expository Writing in English: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Second Language Writing. 3(3), 203-229.
Johnstone, B. (1986). Arguments with Khomeni: Rhetorical Situation and Persuasive Style in Cross-cultural Perspective. Text. 6(2), 171-187.
Kamimura, T. & Oi, K. (1998). Argumentative strategies in America and Japanese English. World Englishes, 17(3), 307-323.
Kwan, B.S.C. (2005). A genre analysis of literature reviews in doctoral theses. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Kwan, B.S.C. (2006). The Schematic Structure of Literature Reviews in Doctoral Theses of Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes. 25, 30-55.
Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical Strategies in Engineering Research Articles and Research Theses: Advanced Academic Literacy and Relations of Power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5(1), 19-36.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning. The Journal of Higher Education. 65(1), 58-74.
Kobayashi, H. (1984). Rhetorical Patterns in English and Japanese. TESOL Quarterly. 18(4), 737-738.
Lewin, B.A., Fine, J. & Young, L. (2001). Expository Discourse: A Genre-based Approach to Social Science Research Text. New York: Continuum.
Lim, J. M. H. (2012). How Do Writers Establish Research Niches? A Genre-based Investigation Into Management Researchers' Rhetorical Steps and Linguistic Mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11(3), 229-245.
Martín, P., & Pérez, I. K. L. (2014). Convincing Peers of the Value of One’s Research: a Genre Analysis of Rhetorical Promotion in Academic Texts. English for Specific Purposes. 34, 1-13.
Meurer, J., & Dellagnelo, A. K. (2008). Conclusions as Components of Research Articles Across Portuguese as a Native Language, English as a Native Language and English as a Foreign Language: a Contrastive Genre Study. The ESPecialist. 29(2), 233-253.
Matelene,C. (1985) Contrastive Rhetoric: an American Writing Teacher in China. Collage Composition. 47(8), 789-808.
Morales, R. C. (2012). Conclusions in Research Articles: A Filipino-japanese Contrastive Rhetorical Study. Philippine ESL Journal. 8.
Martín, P., & Pérez, I. K. L. (2014). Convincing Peers of the Value of One’s Research: a Genre Analysis of Rhetorical Promotion in Academic Texts. English for Specific Purposes. 34, 1-13.
Moreno, A.I. (2008). The Importance of Comparable Corpora in Cross-cultural Studies. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (Eds.). Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric (pp. 25- 41). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nguyen, T. T. L. & Pramoolsook, I. (2014). Rhetorical Structure of Introduction Chapters Written by Novice Vietnamese Tesol Postgraduates. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 20(1), 61-74.
Nguyen, T. T. L. & Pramoolsook, I. (2016). Citations in Literature Review Chapters of TESOL Master’s Theses by Vietnamese Postgraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 16(2),17-32
Ostler, S. E. (1987). English in Parallels: A Comparison of English and Arabic Prose. Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text. 169-185.
Paltridge, B. (2007). Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language- a Handbook for Supervisors. New York: Routledge.
Prior, P. (1994). Response, Revision, Disciplinary: A Microhistory of a Dissertation Prospectus in Sociology. Written Communication. 11, 483-533.
Samraj, B. (2002). Texts and Contextual Layers: Academic Writing in Content Courses. In Johns, A.M. (Ed.). Genre in the Classroom (pp. 163-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical Differences in Ra Introductions Written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10(4), 238-251.
Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M., & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A Contrastive Study of the Rhetorical Organisation of English and Spanish Phd Thesis Introductions. English for Specific Purposes. 30(1), 4-17.
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills: A Course for Nonnative Speakers of English (English for Specific Purposes). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, C. N. L. S. A., & Thompson, R. M. (1982). The
discourse motivation for the perfect aspect: the Mandarin particle le. In Tense-aspect: Between Semantics &
Pragmatics: Containing the Contributions to a Symposium on Tense and Aspect, Held at UCLA, May 1979 (Vol. 1, p. 19). John Benjamins Publishing.
Werle, A. (2007). A Typology of Negative Indefinites. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Zhang, Y. & Hu, J. (2010). A Genre-based Study of Medical Research Article Introductions: a Contrastive Analysis Between Chinese and English. The Asian ESP Journal. 6(1), 72-96.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1702-09
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021