Ophelia Transformed: Revisioning Shakespeare’s Hamlet
Abstract
The critical literature on Ophelia has been constrained to the scope of her characterization within Hamlet and to the corpus of literary criticism that has drawn upon the Shakespearean play to portray the contours of her personality. She is often regarded as the mirror of fragility and frustration; she is lascivious and prone to promiscuity; she has no significance in the structural design of the Shakespeare’s play except to serve as an object of pleasure for Hamlet. Despite all this, Ophelia, within the domain of revisioning literature, has obtained new dimensions which stand in stark contradiction to her traditional figure. This article intends to address the new aspects of her character within the scope of three twenty-first century novels, namely Ophelia, The Prince of Denmark, and The Dead Fathers Club, which have transformed the Shakespearean play. Though Ophelia’s sensuality is emphasized in all these novels, she is endowed with agency, voice, and a skeptical cast of mind. She is defiant of patriarchal and divine authority; and she at times serves as a haven for the young Hamlet. It is argued that these new dimensions of Ophelia’s characterization should be construed not only as a response to the Shakespearean text but as a reaction to the bulk of literature which has yielded to the predominantly male-oriented readings of Ophelia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bloom, Harold. (1973). The Anxiety of Influence: a theory of poetry. London: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, Harold. (1982). The Breaking of Vessels. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bloom, Harold. (1998). Shakespeare: The invention of the human. NY: Penguin.
Ching, Florence Toh Haw & Termizi, Arbaayah Ali. 2012. Roycean Loyalty in William Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol 12(2), 343-358.
Haig, Matt. (2006). The Dead Fathers Club. NY: Penguin.
Hirschfeld, Heather. (2003). Hamlet’s “First Corse”: Repetition, Trauma, and the Displacement of Redemptive Typology. Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol 54(4), 424-448. Retrieved July 22, 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3844057
Holderness, Graham. (2002). The Prince of Denmark. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.
Hume, David. (1955). An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. NY: Liberal Arts Press.
Hunt, Maurice. (2005). Impregnating Ophelia. Neophilologus. Vol 89(4), 641-663.
Jenkins, Harold (Ed.). (1982). Hamlet, The Arden Shakespeare, NY: Routledge.
Khan, Qaisar & Bughio, Faraz Ali (2012). Nunnery Scene: A Pragmatic Analysis of Hamlet-Ophelia Encounter. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol 18(2), 25-34.
Kinney, Arthur F. (2002). Introduction. In A. F. Kinney (Ed.). Hamlet: New Critical Essays (pp. 1-70). NY: Routledge.
Klein, Lisa. (2006). Ophelia. NY: Bloomsbury.
Levin, Kate D. (2002). Two Hamlets, Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol 53(1), 106-115. Retrieved July 22, 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3844042
Marshall, Elizabeth. (2007). Schooling Ophelia: hysteria, memory and adolescent femininity, Gender and Education. Vol 19(6), 707-728. Retrieved May 6, 2012 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540250701650656
O’Rourke, James L. (2012). Retheorizing Shakespeare Through Presentist Readings. NY: Routledge.
Romanska, Magda. (2005). Ontology and Eroticism: Two Bodies of Ophelia, Women’s Studies. Vol 34, 485-513. Retrieved May 6, 2012 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00497870500277914
Rozett, Martha Tuck. (1994). Talking Back to Shakespeare. London: Associated University Press.
Rutter, Carol Chillington. (1998). Snatched Bodies: Ophelia in the Grave. Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol 49(3), 299-319. Retrieved June 7, 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2902261
Schalkwyk, David. (2006). Hamlet’s Dreams, Social Dynamics: A Journal of African Studies. Vol 32(2), 1-21. Retrieved June 25, 2102 from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533950608628725
Shakespeare, William. (1990). Hamlet. H. Jenkins, (Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Showalter, Elaine. (1985). Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibility of Feminist Criticism. In Parker, P. & Hartman, G. (Eds.). Shakespeare and the Question of Theory (pp. 77-94). NY: Routledge.
Spinrad, Phoebe S. (2005). The Fall of a Sparrow and the Map of Hamlet’s Mind, Modern Philology. Vol 102(4), 453-477. Retrieved June 22, 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3692873
Stevenson, Ruth. (2002), Hamlet’s Mice, Motes, Moles, and Minching Malecho, New Literary History. Vol 33(3), 435-459. Retrieved June 22, 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20057735
Traub, Valerie. (1992). Desire and Anxiety: Circulations of Sexuality in Shakespearean Drama. London: Routledge.
Watson, Elizabeth S. (2004). Old King, New King, Eclipsed Sons, and Abandoned Altars in Hamlet, The Sixteenth Century Journal. Vol 35(2), 475-491. Retrieved June 22, 2012 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20476945
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021