The Use of Referential Cohesion in Academic Texts by Persian EFL Learners

Sahar Naderi, Yuen Chee Keong, Hafizah Latif

Abstract


Writing cohesively remains a challenging task for many ESL and EFL learners and users of English, even at advanced levels. Despite its importance in academic writing, elements of cohesion have rarely been researched especially among Persian EFL writers. This study is aimed at filling the gap in the literature through an investigation of referential ties as one of the most explicit cohesion markers (Halliday and Matthiessen 2004). Papers by Persian scholars in the engineering field who attended a Nanotech conference in Malaysia, were reviewed for referential ties based on Systemic Functional Grammar (Halliday 1994; Halliday and Matthiessen 2004). The distribution and categorization of such ties were described using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Subsequently the reference usage by Persians who performed research in Malaysian and Iranian universities were compared. A discussion is presented to examine any improvements due to the environment for the group of Persians studying in Malaysian universities using English language as the medium of instruction. The results confirm that Persians studying in Malaysian universities produce and repeat some components of referential ties more frequently in their academic writing when compared with their peers studying in Iranian universities. In addition, the results of this study are compared with the findings of some other studies among ESL/EFL learners of different nationalities to explain the cases of overuse, underuse, and misuse of referential cohesion which has implications for pedagogical objectives.


Keywords


academic writing; referential cohesion; systemic functional grammar; Persian EFL learners, conference papers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansarin, A. A. (2004). Nongeneric use of the definite article the by Persian learners. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities. Vol. 47, 1-11.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.

Coskun, E., (2011). Cohesion in compositions of Turkish and immigrant students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. Vol. 11(2), 892-899.

Gardezi, S. A. & Nesi, H., (2009). Variation in the writing of Economics students in Britain and Pakistan: The case of conjunctive ties. In Charles, M., Pecorari, D., Hunston, S. (Eds.). Academic writing: at the interface of corpus and discourse (pp. 236- 250). London, New York: Continuum.

Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M. & Nejad Ansari, D. (2010). The impact of portfolio assessment on Iranian EFL students’ essay writing: a process-oriented approach. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 10(3), 35-51.

Gray, B., (2010). On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 9, 167-173.

Gray, B. & Cortes, V., (2011). Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 30, 31-43.

Gullberg, M., (2006). Handling Discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning. Vol. 56(1) 155-196.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R., (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edition. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen C., (2004). An introduction to functional grammar, (3rd Ed.). London: Hodder Education.

Hinkel, E., (2001). Matters of Cohesion in L2 Academic Texts. Applied Language Learning. Vol. 12(2), 111-132.

Jafarpur, A., (1991). Cohesiveness as a basis for evaluating compositions. System. Vol. 19, 459-465.

Jisa, H., (2000). Increasing cohesion in narratives: a developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects in French. Linguistics. Vol. 38(3), 591-620.

Kang, J. H., (2009). Referencing in a Second Language: Korean EFL Learners’ Cohesive Use of References in Written Narrative Discourse. Discourse Processes. Vol. 46, 439-466.

Liu, M. & Braine, G., (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System. Vol. 33, 623-636.

Mc Gee, I., (2009). Traversing the lexical cohesion minefield. ELT Journal. Vol. 63(3), 212-220.

Mikhchi, H. H., (2011). Standards of textuality: Rendering English and Persian texts based on a textual model. Journal of Universal Language. Vol. 12(1), 47-74.

Norman, G. J., 2003. Consistent naming in scientific writing: sound advice or shibboleth? English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 22, 113-130.

Rayson, P. (2012) Log-likelihood Calculator Website. Retrieved June 17, 2012 from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html

Roth, F. P., Spekman, N. J. & Fye, E. C., (1995). Reference

cohesion in the oral narratives of students with learning disabilities and normally achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly. Vol. 18(1), 25-40.

Salehi, H. & Melor Md. Yunus, (2012). The Washback Effect of The Iranian Universities Entrance Exam: Teachers’ Insights. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 12(2), 609-628.

Schleppegrell, M., (2004). The language of schooling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

Serratrice, L., (2007). Referential cohesion in the narratives of bilingual English-Italian children and monolingual peers. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 39, 1058-1087.

Tardy, C. M., (2005). “It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 4, 325-338.

Wolf, Y. & Walters, J. (2001). Definite articles in the context of literary and scientific writings. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 33, 965-967.

Zhang, M., (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal. Vol. 31(1) 61-95.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021