Personal Pronouns as Guiding Strategies in Academic Lectures across Two Institutions
Abstract
Studies on linguistic features employed by native-speaker (NS) and non-native speaker (NNS) lecturers when delivering academic lectures have been scarce, perhaps due to the difficulty and complexity of collecting data for analysis. This paper attempts to fill the gap by analyzing how personal pronouns I, you and we are used in undergraduate engineering lectures in two instructions across different backgrounds to emphasize the way lecturers guide their students throughout the unfolding texts. Ten lectures (five each from a Malaysian university and a British university) covering fundamental engineering courses attended by second-year Civil Engineering students delivered by different lecturers were video-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Based on eleven discourse functions that could facilitate students’ understanding of lecture contents, pronouns I, you and we that occurred in phrases and clauses that manifest the identified lecture discourse functions were analyzed and compared. Findings reveal apparent similarities in the use of pronouns by NS and NNS lecturers in guiding students to follow their lectures. You and we have been identified as the most common pronouns used by both NS and NNS lecturers among the three pronouns. The findings reveal that factors that underline lectures as a genre override all others in the lecturer’s delivery as far as pronouns are concerned. The findings are nevertheless valuable for training young lecturers to improve delivery efficiency, especially for academic mobility for both students and lecturers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English (Vol. 24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Aguilar, M. (2008). Metadiscourse in academic speech: A relevance-theoretic approach. Bern: Peter Lang.
Aguilar, M. & Macia, E.A. (2002). Metadiscourse in lecture comprehension: Does it really help foreign language learners? Atlantis, 14(2), 3-12.
Akoto, O. Y. (2020). Individualities in the Referents of I, we, and you in academic lectures across disciplines. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 1-14.
Akoto, O. Y., Ansah, J. O. A., & Fordjour, E. A. (2021). Personal pronouns in classroom: A corpus-based study of I, we and you in university lectures across disciplines. Journal of Languages for Specific Purposes (JLSP), 8, 53-66.
Auria, C. P. (2006). Signaling speaker’s intentions: towards a phraseology of textual metadiscourse in academic lecturing. English as a GloCalization phenomenon. Observations from a Linguistic Microcosm, 3, 59-86
Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes, 16(3), 313-319.
Bjorkman, B. (2010). So you think you can ELF; English as a lingua franca as the medium of instruction. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 45, 77-96.
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph. D theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S41-S56.
Cheng, S. W. (2012). “That’s it for today”: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 234-248.
Camiciottoli, B. C. (2005). Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 183-199.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written communication, 10(1), 39-71.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction-a growing global phenomenon. British Council.
Dechvijankit, P., & Puangsing, S. (2021, May 27-28). An analysis of how Thai undergraduate students use personal pronouns in their English academic writing. The 2nd International Conference on Informatics, Agriculture, Management, Business
Administration, Engineering, Science and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Thailand.
Deroey, K. L. (2012). What they highlight is…: The discourse functions of basic wh-clefts in lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 112-124.
Flowerdew, J. (1994). Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension: An overview. In Academic listening: Research perspectives, (pp. 7-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1997). The teaching of academic listening comprehension and the question of authenticity. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 27-46.
Fortanet, I. (2006). Interaction in academic spoken English: the use of ‘I’and ‘you’in the MICASE. In Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes (pp. 35-51). Springer, Boston, MA.
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017). You, I, and We: Personal pronouns in EAP classroom discourse. In Exploring Spoken English Learner Language Using Corpora (pp. 95-113). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hincks, R. (2010). Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca oral presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 29(1), 4-18.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164.
Işık-Taş, E. E. (2018). Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers' discourse choices. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 26-38.
Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125-143.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). The language (s) of HE: EMI and/or ELF and/or multilingualism? The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 4-15.
Kuo, C. H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121-138.
Lee, E. H. (2010). An analysis of online lecture discourse of a Korean NNS teacher and an American NS teacher. Linguistic Research, 27(1), 209-229.
Li, Z. (2021). Authorial presence in research article abstracts: A diachronic investigation of the use of first-person pronouns. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 1-13.
Lu, D. (2002). English medium teaching at crisis: Towards bilingual education in Hong Kong. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 2.
Luzon, M. J. (2009). The use of we in a learner corpus of reports written by EFL Engineering students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 192-206.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76.
Miller, L. (2014). Listening to lecturers in a second language: A Southeast Asian perspective. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 64-75.
Molino, A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 86-101.
Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 325-338.
Okamura, A. (2009). Use of personal pronouns in two types of monologic academic speech. The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 52(1), 17-26.
Othman, Z. (2010). The use of okay, right and yeah in academic lectures by native speaker lecturers: Their ‘anticipated’and ‘real’meanings. Discourse Studies, 12(5), 665-681.
Özer, H., & Okan, Z. (2018). Discourse markers in EFL classrooms: A corpus-driven research. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 50-66.
Rounds, P. L. (1987). Multifunctional personal pronoun use in an educational setting. English for Specific Purposes, 6(1), 13-29.
Samson, C. (2006). … Is Different From …: A corpus-based study of evaluative adjectives in economics discourse. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(3), 236-245.
Sert, N. (2008). The language of instruction dilemma in the Turkish context. System, 36, 156-171.
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first-person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23-S39.
Thøgersen, J., & Airey, J. (2011). Lecturing undergraduate science in Danish and in English: A comparison of speaking rate and rhetorical style. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 209-221.
Thijssen, E. J. D. (2019). Lexical bundles in NS lecturing and NNS lecturing: a corpus-based study. Unpublished Master’s thesis Radboud University.
Vickov, G., & Jakupcevic, E. (2017). Discourse markers in non-native EFL teacher talk. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 649-671.
Yang, W. (2014). Stance and engagement: A corpus-based analysis of academic spoken discourse across science domains. LSP Journal-Language for Special Purposes, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition, 5(1).
Yang, W. (2020). A keyword analysis of stance and engagement in three-minute thesis (3MT) presentations. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(2).
Yeo, J. Y., & Ting, S. H. (2014). Personal pronouns for student engagement in arts and science lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 34, 26-37.
Young, L. (1994). University lectures–macro-structure and micro-features. In Academic listening: Research perspectives, (pp. 159-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yu, C. (2021). Authorial identity behind first person pronouns in English research articles of native and non-native scholars. Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 462-478.
Zare, J., & Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki, Z. (2017). Genre awareness and academic lecture comprehension: The impact of teaching importance markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 31-41.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-19
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021