Learning Styles Of Yemeni Undergraduate Science Students

Angela Abu-Asba, Hazita Azman, Rosniah Mustaffa

Abstract


 

The aim of this paper is to investigate the preferred learning styles of 179 Yemeni students studying science at the Faculty of Science, Sana’a University, Yemen in response to a need for improving the learning of science among Yemeni students. A learning style refers to the ways of learning that include how learners perceive, interact with and respond to the learning environment. This paper applies Reid’s (1995) taxonomy of six learning style preferences: visual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, group, and individual styles to classify the styles of the students in this study.  Data was collected through questionnaires, interviews, observation checklists, and field notes. The questionnaire data was coded and analyzed using the SPSS program while the interview data was transcribed, organized, coded, categorized, and analyzed. The findings show that the tactile and kinesthetic styles were the most prevalent styles among the students, followed by the auditory style. This has pedagogical implications for the teaching of science in Yemen.

 


Keywords


learning styles, learning preferences, science students, perceptual learning style preference, academic literacy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnum, M. (2011). Athletic training student learning style. International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training, 16(2), 33-37.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents, Inc.

Butler, K. A. (1984). Learning and teaching style: In theory and practice. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems

Duman, B. (2010). The effects of brain-based learning on the academic achievement of students with different learning styles. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10 (4), 2077-2103.

Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1987). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they...can they...be matched? In J. M. Reid (Ed.). The learning style preferences of ESL Students. TESOL Quarterly, 1(21), 87-111.

Egel, I. P. (2009). English language learning and teaching styles in two Turkish primary schools. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(8), 1117-1128.

Farquharson, M. (1989). Learning styles of Arab students in EFL classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the teachers of English to speakers of other languages, San Antonio.

Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.

Healey, M. & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb's experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99, 185-195.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work- related values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.

Mahyoub, A. A. (1996). Approaches to study process and university classroom environment: The case of pre-service science teachers at the college of education in Sana’a University. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh.

Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. 4th ed. California Sage

Mulalic, A. & Mohd Shah, P. & Ahmad, F. (2009). Perceptual learning styles of ESL students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 3(7), 101- 113.

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2004). NSTA position statement: Scientific inquiry. USA: Ellis University of Kansas.

National Research Council (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. USA: The National Academies Press.

Nour, S. S. (2003). Science and Technology (S &T) Development indicators in the Arab Region: A comparative study of Arab Gulf and Mediterranean countries. Paper presented at the ERF 10th Annual Conference, Morocco16-18 December.

Oxford, R. L. (1995). Language Learning Strategies. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 52-61). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 1 (21), 87-111.

Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Reid, J. M. (1996). A learning styles unit for the intermediate ESL/EFL writing classroom. TESOL Journal, Autumn, 42-7.

Ropo, E. (1993). Studying technology: an investigation of approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching in Finnish university of technology. Higher Education, 25, 111-132.

Rosniah, M. (2007). Mengadaptasikan gaya pembelajaran pelajar ESL: Satu kajian kes pelajar tahun satu di UKM. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 7(1), 1-32.

Schellhase , K. (2006). Kolb’s experiential learning theory in athletic training education: A literature review. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2, 18-27.

Stebbins, C. (1996). Culture specific perceptual learning-style preferences of postsecondary students of English as a second language. In J. Merrifield (Ed.), Examining the language learning strategies used by French adult learners Unpublished MSc Dissertation (pp. 1-47). USA: Aston University.

Thang, S. M. (2003). Investigating Malaysian distance learners’ conceptions of their learning styles in learning English. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 3(1), 1-28.

Felder,R. (1993). Reading the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286-290.

Tubic, T. & Glu, K. H. (2009). Linking learning styles and teaching styles. In A. Swennen & M. Van der Klink (Eds.), Becoming a Teacher Educator (pp. 133-144). Serbia: University of Novi Sad.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Matsuura, K. (2003). Science and technology education in the Arab world in the 21st century. UNESCO International Science, Technology & Environmental Education Newsletter, XXVIII (3-4), 1-28 .


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021