Islam as The State Ideology: Exploring from Gramsci’s Notion of Power, Culture and Ideology
Abstract
The paper aims at establishing relationships between culture, power, and the state ideology. The reading of Malaysian politics through Gramsci’s conceptual framework provides a tentative interpretation on the state’s exercise of power with popular consent, the structure of power, relation between the state and subaltern groups. Reading through the concept of hegemony, the paper explores the construction and enactment of Islam by the power of the state. It highlights how Islam came to be constructed as the state ideology and how the state establishes and maintains the hegemonic position. On this basis, Islam has been used to produce a specific set of structures in Malaysia to gain national-popular support. The state-society relations will be explored through Gramsci’s notion of civil society to illustrate the possible resistance to the state power. The paper suggests that civil society as a field of contestation in Malaysia. The 14th General Election result has demonstrated that ideology could be contested, hence challenging the state’s domination or coercive power. In conclusion, this paper has demonstrated the previous state’s struggle with civil actors in dominating and maintaining its popular ideology. It could be seen how actors of nonconformist voices in civil society have mobilised themselves into organised groups and institutions to undermine the state hegemony thus assisting the change of the ruling power in the GE14. After 61 years of Independence, Malaysia is finally celebrated the new ruling party.
Keywords: Civil society, culture, ideology, power, state hegemony.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, N. G. (2015). Reading Gramsci Through Fanon: Hegemony Before Dominance in Revolutionary Theory, Rethinking Marxism. Association for Economic and Social Analysis, 27(2), 241-257.
Althusser, L. (2006). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader (pp. 86-111). Australia: Blackwell Publishing.
Anuar, M. K. (2005). Politics and the Media in Malaysia. Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 20(1), 25-47.
Azim, F. (2011). Editorial Introduction: Islam, Culture, and Women. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 12(2), 173-175.
Buyong, M., & Ismail, R. (2011, October). Islamic Programs in Malaysian Free-To-Air Television Channels. Paper presented at the International Conference on Islamic Civilization and Malay Identity. Retrieved from http://irep.iium.edu.my/7554/2/Islamic_Program_in_Malaysian_TV.pdf
Cappuccio, A. D. M. (2012). The Relationship Between Dialect, Theatre, and Power in Antonio Gramsci. The Italianist, 32(1), 67-83.
Crouch, H. (1996). Government and Society in Malaysia. New South Wales: Allen & Unwin Australia Ptd Ltd.
Daldal, A. (2014). Power and Ideology in Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci: A Comparative Analysis. Review of History and Political Science, 2(2), 149-167.
Durham, M. G. & Kellner, D. M. (2009). Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks. USA: Blackwell Publishing.
Eickelman, D. F. (1981). The Middle East: An Anthropological Approach. London: Prentice-Hall.
George, C. (2003). The Internet and The Narrow Tailoring Dilemma for Asian democracies. The Communication Review, 6, 247–268.
George, C. (2007). Media in Malaysia: Zone of Contention. Democratization, 14(5), 893-910.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Edited and translated by Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith). London: Lawrence and Hishart.
Guan, L. H. (2004). Civil Society in Southeast Asia. In L. H. Guan (Ed.), Civil Society in Southeast Asia (pp. 1-26). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Hall, S. (1996). Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. In M. David, & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (pp. 411-440). London: Routledge.
Hearman, V. (2013). Sources and Methodologies: History: Southeast Asia. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Women and Islamic Cultures: Disciplinary Paradigms and Approaches: 2003 – 2013 (pp. 177-202). Leiden: Brill.
Heufers, R. (2002). The Politics of Democracy in Malaysia. Asien, 85, 39-60.
Hilley, J. (2001). Malaysia: Mahathirism, Hegemony and The New Opposition. London: Zed Books Ltd.
Holliday, S. J. (2016). The Legacy of Subalternity and Gramsci’s National–Popular: Populist Discourse in The Case of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 917-933.
Houben, V. J. H. (2003). Islam: Enduring Myths and Changing Realities: Southeast Asia and Islam. The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 588(149), 1-17.
Kenyon, A. T., & Marjoribanks, T. (2007). Transforming Media Markets: The Cases of Malaysia and Singapore. Australian Journal of Emerging Technology and Society, 5(2), 103-118.
Landau, I. (2008). Law and Civil Society in Cambodia and Vietnam: A Gramscian Perspective. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(2), 244-258.
Lears, T. J. (1985). The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities. The American Historical Review, 90(3), 567-593.
Leong, W. T. (1989). Culture and The State: Manufacturing Traditions for Tourism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 6(4), 355-375.
Lipka, M., & Hackett, C. (2017). Why Muslims Are The World’s Fastest-Growing Religious Group. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/
Martin, D. (2014). Gender, Malayness and the Ummah: Cultural Consumption and Malay-Muslim Identity. Asian Studies Review, 38(3), 403-421.
Martinez, P. (2001). The Islamic State or The State of Islam in Malaysia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(3), 474-503.
Miles, L., & Croucher, R. (2013). Gramsci, Counter-Hegemony and Labour Union–Civil Society Organisation Coalitions in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(3), 413-427.
Mohd Sani, M. A. (2004). Media Freedom in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 35(3), 341-367.
Mohamed Osman, M. N., & Saleem, S. (2016, June 10). The Impact of Islamic Civil Society Organisations on Malaysian Islam and Politics. Retrieved from http://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Malaysia-Update-April-2016_Copy_Finalised.pdf
Nagata, J. (1980). Religious Ideology and Social Change: The Islamic Revival in Malaysia. Pacific Affairs, 53(3), 405-439.
Nain, Z., & Anuar, M. K. (1998). Ownership and Control of the Malaysian Media. Retrieved from http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/kasarinlan/article/download/448/413
Neo, J. L. C. (2006). Malay nationalism, Islamic supremacy and the constitutional bargain in the multi-ethnic composition of Malaysia. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 13(1), 95-118.
O’Shannassy, M. (2008). Beyond the Barisan Nasional? A Gramscian perspective of the 2008 Malaysian general election. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31(1), 88-109.
Ong, A. (1990). Malay Families, Women's Bodies, and the Body Politic in Malaysia. American Ethnologist, 17(2), 258-276.
Oswell, D. (2006). Culture and Society: An Introduction to Cultural Studies. London: Sage Publications.
Ramasamy, P. (2004). Civil Society in Malaysia: An Arena of Contestations?. In H. G. Lee (Ed.), Civil Society in Southeast Asia (pp. 198-216). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Rusnak, T. (2012). Islam, Nationalism, and Nation-Building in Malaysia and Indonesia: Top-down or Bottom-up. McGill International Review, 2(2), 16-22.
Shamsul, A. B. (1996). Debating About Identity in Malaysia: A Discourse Analysis. Southeast Asian Studies, 34(3), 566-600.
Shamsul, A. B. (2005). Making Sense of the Plural-Religious Past and The Modern-Secular Present of the Islamic Malay World and Malaysia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 33(3), 449-472.
Stavrakakis, Y., & Galanopoulos, A. (2018). Ernesto Laclau and Communication Studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedias.
Storey, J. (2010). Culture and Power in Cultural Studies: The Politics of Signification. Great Britain: Edinburgh University Press.
Villanueva, V. J. (1993). Bootstraps: From an American Academic of Colour. America: National Council of Teachers of English.
Wang, L. K. (1998). Malaysia: Ownership as Control, Development Dialogue. The Journal of the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 2, 61-84.
Willford, A. C. (2007). Cage of Freedom: Tamil Identity and The Ethnic Fetish in Malaysia. Singapore: NUS Press.
Yaapar, S. (2005). Negotiating Identity in Malaysia: Multi-cultural Society, Islam, Theatre and Tourism. Asian Journal of Social Science, 33(3), 473-485
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528