Beyond Art: Graffiti as a Medium of Counterpublics

Djamila Hess, Deddy Mulyana

Abstract


The use of a variety of art forms to support citizens’ dissent and protest is a long-standing tradition in Indonesia. This work aims at investigating the role of artistic, low-technology modes of communication in the form of graffiti for the mediation of interests of counter publics. Therefore, we focus on graffiti and its utilization within the ARAP (People’s aliance against eviction) movement in Tamansari, Bandung (Indonesia). Based on Grounded Theory and with the help of interviews with artists and activists as well as observations, and a content analysis of the artworks, different ways graffiti can contribute to the representation of interests of counterpublics are investigated. Our results show that graffiti is not simply a substitute for missing mass media coverage as often indicated. The special quality of graffiti allows not only for the utilization as a means for opposing marginalization tendencies in media and society, but it also bears its own media-specific characteristics that other (communication) media cannot provide: Through its emotional approach and its media-specific characteristics, communicating via graffiti allows for addressing and sensitizing (new) audiences. Additionally, graffiti supports the aims of the movement such as communicating information, framing events, mobilizing, and motivating activists and residents, as well as contesting space. In this regard, the ARAP movement reappropriates the public space for the people they aim to represent through the creative practice of graffiti.

 

Keywords: Counterpublic, graffiti, protest movement, street art, social movement.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3803-01

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abaza, M. (2013). Walls, segregating downtown Cairo and the Mohammed Mahmud Street graffiti. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), 122–139.

Adams, J. (2002). Art in social movements: Shantytown women's protest in Pinochet's Chile. Sociological Forum, 17(1), 21–56.

Babbie, E. R. (2008). The basics of social research (4th ed., International student ed.). Thomson/Wadsworth.

Baeumer, T. (2009). Zeichen setzen! P.S. Graffiti sind Krieg [Set a sign! P.S. Graffiti is war.]. In K. Schönberger (Ed.), Kommt herunter, reiht euch ein… Eine kleine Geschichte der Protestformen sozialer Bewegungen [Come down, join in… A short history of the protest forms of social movements] (pp. 109–129). Assoziation A.

Bihr, J. (2015). Graffiti als performativer akt der Subversion: Die Kairoer kunstlandschaft des Öffentlichen raums nach den Politischen Umschwüngen von 2011 [Graffiti as a Performative Act of Subversion: The Art Landscape of Public Space in Cairo after the Political Upheavals of 2011]. Politische Ikonographie: Gegenstände, Begriffe und Horizonte.

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

Bodunrin, I. (2014). Rap, graffiti and social media in South Africa today. Media Development 4 [Magazine].

Bogerts, L. K. (2016). Die responsibility to protest: Street art als waffe des widerstands? [The responsibility to protest: Street art as a weapon of resistance?]. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik, 9(4), 503–529.

Boxill, I., Chambers, C., & Wint, E. (1997). Introduction to social research. Canoe Press Univ. of the West Indies.

Chaffee, L. G. (1993). Political protest and street art: Popular tools for democratization in hispanic countries (no. 40). Greenwood Press.

Choi, S. Y., & Cho, Y. (2017). Generating counter-public spheres through social media: Two social movements in Neoliberalised South Korea. Javnost - The Public, 24(1), 15–33.

Clark, M. D. (2019). White folks’ work: Digital allyship praxis in the #BlackLivesMatter movement. Social Movement Studies, 18(5), 519-534.

Cseke, I. (2018). Netzwerke aus inszenierung und Öffentlichkeit: Protest, Kunst und Theater auf YouTube [Networks of Performance and the Public: Protest, Art and Theater on YouTube]. Epodium.

D’Cruz, G. (2016). The beach beneath the street: Art and counterpublics. In P. D. Marshall, G. D'Cruz, S. McDonald & K. Lee (Eds.), Contemporary publics (Chap. 14, pp. 17–26). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Dresing, T., & Pehl, T. (2018). Praxisbuch interview, transkription & analyse: Anleitungen und regelsysteme für qualitativ forschende [Practice book interview, transcription & analysis: Instructions and rules for qualitative researchers] (8. Auflage). Eigenverlag.

Ekomadyo, A., Prasetyo, F., & Yuliar, S. (Eds.). (2013). Place construction and urban social transformation: An actor network theory analysis for creative Kampong phenomena in Bandung (Conference paper). HABITechno International Seminar - Innovation Housing and Settlement Technology, November 11-2013, Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.17613/M6TF7Q

Engesser, S., & Wimmer, J. (2009). Gegenöffentlichkeit(en) und partizipativer journalismus im Internet [Counterpublic(s) and participatory journalism on the Internet]. Publizistik, 54(1), 43–63.

Freudenthaler, R. (2020). Which online counter-publics on Facebook are fostering agonistic respect? An assessment of counter-publics debating Germany’s refugee policy. Javnost-The Public, 27(3), 247-265.

Geise, S., & Lobinger, K. (2015). Visual framing: Perspektiven und herausforderungen der visuellen kommunikationsforschung [Perspectives and challenges of visual communication research]. Herbert Von Halem Verlag.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.

Grady, M. P. (1998). Qualitative and action research: A practitioner handbook. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Habermas, J. (1991). Strukturwandel der: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft [The structural transformation of the public sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society]. Suhrkamp.

Hall, A. (2017). If walls could talk: The collective artist-activist role in Indonesian street art. Malaysian Journal of Performing and Visual Arts, 3(1), 54–74.

Kavada, A., & Poell, T. (2021). From counterpublics to contentious publicness: Tracing the temporal, spatial, and material articulations of popular protest through social media. Communication Theory, 31(2), 190-208.

Kim, B., Tillie, N., Smit, M., & de Wit, L. (2019). Mosaic garden city [Master thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands]. TU Delft.

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6f5c4b66-4aa3-42cd-b490-6702c9a246e8

Kneuer, M. (2017). Politische kommunikation und digitale medien in der demokratie [Political communication and digital media in democracy]. Bundeszentrale fur politische Bildung.

https://www.bpb.de/lernen/digitale-bildung/medienpaedagogik/medienkompetenz-schriftenreihe/257593/politische-kommunikation-und-digitale-medien-in-der-demokratie

Konecki, K. T. (2011). Visual grounded theory: A methodological outline and examples from empirical work. Revija za Sociologiju, 41(2), 131–160.

KOTAKU. (2017). Tentang program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) [About the Program City without Slums (KOTAKU)]. Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya.

Lee, D. (2013). “Anybody can do it”: Aesthetic empowerment, urban citizenship, and the naturalization of Indonesian graffiti and street art. City & Society, 25(3), 304–327.

Lee, D. (2015). A troubled vernacular: Legibility and presence in Indonesian activist art. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(2), 303–322.

Lennon, J. (2014). Assembling a revolution: Graffiti, Cairo and the Arab Spring. Cultural Studies Review, 20(1).

Lien, A. N. (2022). A battle for truth: Islam-related counterpublic discourse on Scandinavian news media Facebook pages. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/h3fq

Mey, G., & Dietrich, M. (2016). Vom Text zum Bild – Überlegungen zu einer visuellen Grounded-Theory-Methodologie [From text to image - Reflections on a visual Grounded Theory Methodology]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2).

Olteanu, T. (2013). Graffiti - Schmiererei oder politische Partizipation? [Graffiti - Smearing or Political Participation?]. In D. d. Nève & Olteanu (Eds.), Politische partizipation jenseits der jonventionen [Political participation transcending conventions] (pp. 177–203). Verlag Barbara Budrich.

Ouaras, K. (2018). Tagging in Algeria: Graffiti as aesthetic claim and protest. The Journal of North African Studies, 23(1-2), 173-190.

Peteet, J. (1996). The writing on the walls: The graffiti of the Intifada. Cultural Anthropology, 11(2), 139-159.

Prasetyo, F. (2020). Eviction and urban resistance in Bandung. New Mandala. www.newmandala.org/eviction-and-urban-resistance-in-Bandung/

Prasetyo, F., & Iverson, S. (Eds.). (2013). Art, activism and the ‘Creative Kampong’: A case study from Dago Pojok, Bandung, Indonesia (Conference paper). International Conference, March 4-5, 2013, Planning in the Era of Uncertainty.

Riebes, K. (2010). Politische Stencil-Graffiti als Teil von Gegenöffentlichkeit [Political Stencil-Graffiti as part of a counter public sphere] [Master's dissertation, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald].

https://politicalstencils.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/masterarbeit-kilian-riebes.pdf

Rolston, B. (1987). Politics, painting and popular culture: The political wall murals of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society, 9(1), 5-28.

Safruddin, H. I. (2014). When the wall talks: A semiotics analysis of graffiti tagged by "Act Move" [S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. UPI Repository. http://repository.upi.edu/6947/

Siegl, N. (2010). Definition des begriffs graffiti [Definition of the Term Graffiti]. Graffiti Europa. http://www.graffitieuropa.org/definition1.htm

Sills, S., Pickens, C., Beach, K., Jones, L., Calder-Dawe, O., Benton-Greig, P., & Gavey, N. (2016). Rape culture and social media: Young critics and a feminist counterpublic. Feminist Media Studies, 16(6), 935–951.

Smith, N. R. (2020). Spatial poetics under authoritarianism: graffiti and the contestation of urban redevelopment in contemporary China. Antipode, 52(2), 581-601.

Swastika, A. (2019). Political art in Indonesia: 1980 - A decade of political art in Indonesia during the New Order. Cobo Social.

https://www.cobosocial.com/dossiers/political-art-indonesia-1980/

Tarozzi, M. (2020). What is grounded theory?. London: Bloomsbury.

Thakur, A. K. (2020). New media and the Dalit counter-public sphere. Television & New Media, 21(4), 360-375.

Tulke, J. (2019). „Wall for sale, with Acropolis view!“: Street Art, Graffiti und die Archäopolitik der Krise [Street Art, Graffiti and the Archaeo-politics of Crisis]. In Bernbeck, R., & Egbers, V. (Eds.), Subalterne räume (Themenheft) (Forum Kritische Archäologie, 8, pp. 167–182). Creative Commons. https://doi.org/10.6105/journal.fka.2019.8.9

Waldner, L. K., & Dobratz, B. A. (2013). Graffiti as a form of contentious political participation. Sociology Compass, 7(5), 377–389.

Wimmer, J. (2007). (Gegen-)Öffentlichkeit in der mediengesellschaft: Analyse eines medialen spannungsverhältnisses [(Counter)Public in the media society: Analysis of a medial tension] (1. Aufl.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden.

Wimmer, J. (2012). The times they are a-changin': The digital transformation of 'Classic' counter-public spheres. CM - Casopis za Upravljanje Komuniciranjem, 7(23), 5–22.

Wimmer, J. (2015). Alternative medien, soziale bewegungen und medienaktivismus [Alternative media, social movements, and media activism]. In A. Hepp, F. Krotz, S. Lingenberg & J. Wimmer (Eds.), Handbuch cultural studies und medienanalyse [Handbook cultural studies and media analysis] (pp. 191–199). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Wonneberger, A., Hellsten, I. R., & Jacobs, S. H. (2021). Hashtag activism and the configuration of counterpublics: Dutch animal welfare debates on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 24(12), 1694-1711.

Yuniar, R., & Efendi, D. (2018). Art and urban politics: Social and political impact of ‘underground’movement toward neoliberal development in Yogyakarta, Indonesia (conference paper). Shifting Underground in East and Southeast Asia: Transformations and Declinations of Cultural Self-Expressions and Community in Cityscape, Singapore, 25-26 October 2018.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528