Faktor Kesukaran dalam Proses Memodelkan Sebuah Tapak Arkeologi Menerusi Pendekatan Geospatial

Azizul Ahmad, Mohd Zulhafiz Said, Tarmiji Masron, Nur Afiqah Ariffin, Yaniza Shaira Zakaria, Ardiansyah Ardiansyah, Lindah Roziani Jamru, Nor Khairunnisa Talib, Nur Rafidah Asyikin Idris, Norliza Abd. Rahman, Luqman Haqim Bismelah, Asykal Syakinah Mohd Ali, Bryan Anderson Wis, Norizan Musa

Abstract


Selama bertahun-tahun, ahli arkeologi telah bergantung pada peta dan analisis ruangan untuk memahami taburan artifak dan ciri di seluruh tapak arkeologi secara visualisasi. Walau bagaimanapun, pengenalan foto udara, penderiaan jauh digital, sistem maklumat geografi (GIS) dan sistem keletakan global (GPS) telah menyediakan ahli arkeologi dengan alat canggih untuk menganalisis dan menggambarkan taburan dan data arkeologi dengan cara yang inovatif. Oleh yang demikian, analisis geospatial telah mendapat pengiktirafan yang penting sebagai salah satu alat untuk membantu ahli arkeologi. Dengan menyepadukan foto udara, penderiaan jauh, GIS dan GPS ke dalam penyelidikan mereka, ahli arkeologi kini dapat menganalisis kuantiti data yang besar dalam masa yang sama memahami peranan ruangan. Ini telah membolehkan mereka memperoleh pandangan baru tentang taburan dan corak ciri arkeologi tersebut. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji faktor kesukaran dalam proses memodelkan sebuah tapak arkeologi menerusi pendekatan geospatial. Antara faktor kepelbagaian yang menimbulkan kesukaran dalam proses memodelkan tapak arkeologi adalah tapak arkeologi, persekitaran, tingkah laku atau kelakukan dan faktor teknikal. Dengan kemajuan teknologi, pendekatan geospatial merupakan kaedah terbaik untuk penyelidikan arkeologi manakala ahli arkeologi perlu berhati-hati dan menimbang faedah dan cabaran yang berkaitan dengan analisis geospatial, memastikan kaedah ini digunakan secara berhemah dan beretika.

Kata kunci: Arkeologi; foto udara; penderiaan jauh digital; Sistem Maklumat Geografi (GIS); Sistem Keletakan Global (GPS)

Abstract: Over the years, archaeologists have relied on maps and spatial analysis to visually understand the distribution of artifacts and features across archaeological sites. However, introducing aerial photography, digital remote sensing, geographic information systems (GIS), and global positioning systems (GPS) has provided archaeologists with sophisticated tools to analyze and depict archaeological distribution and data innovatively. Consequently, geospatial analysis has gained significant recognition as a tool to assist archaeologists. By integrating aerial photos, remote sensing, GIS, and GPS into their research, archaeologists can now analyze large quantities of data while understanding the spatial aspects simultaneously. This has enabled them to gain new insights into the distribution and patterns of archaeological features. This article examines the difficulty factors in modeling an archaeological site through geospatial approaches. Among the diverse factors that pose challenges in modeling archaeological sites are the archaeological site itself, the environment, behavior or conduct, and technical factors. With technological advancements, geospatial approaches represent the best method for archaeological investigations. At the same time, archaeologists must be cautious and weigh the benefits and challenges of geospatial analysis, ensuring that this method is used judiciously and ethically.

Keywords: Archaeology; aerial photography; digital remote sensing; Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Global Positioning Systems (GPS)

References

Ahmad, A. (2015). Aplikasi sistem maklumat geografi dalam pengurusan data tapak arkeologi.  Dlm T. Masron, & M. Saidin. Teknologi maklumat ruangan dalam arkeologi. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Ahmad, A., & Masron, T. (2013). Aplikasi Sistem Maklumat Geografi (GIS) dalam menganggar keluasan petempatan awal di tapak arkeologi Lembah Lenggong, Hulu Perak, Perak, Malaysia. Jurnal Perspektif: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 5(1), 19-38.

Ahmad, A., Masron, T., Osman, M. A., Mohammed, B., & Marzuki, A. (2011). Initial Studies on Web Based Tourism Decision Support System (WBTDSS) case study: Langkawi Island, Kedah. In Azizi Bahuddin (Ed.). Proceedings of 2nd Regional Conference on Tourism Research: Venturing into New Tourism Research (pp. 344-359). Sustainable Tourism Research Cluster (STRC), Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Ahmad, A., Masron, T., & Saidin, M. (2015). Aplikasi sistem maklumat geografi untuk menganggar keluasan petempatan awal tapak arkeologi Lembah Lenggong, Hulu Perak, Perak. Dlm T. Masron, & M. Saidin. Teknologi maklumat ruangan dalam arkeologi. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Ahmad, A., Mohd Ayob, N., & Abdul Majid, A. (2013). Regional Carrying Capacity (RCC) issues Langkawi Islands, Kedah. In B. Mohamed & A. Bahauddin, Proceedings of International Conference on Tourism Development: Building the Future of Tourism, Penang, Malaysia, 4 & 5 February 2013 (pp. 487). Sustainable Tourism Research Cluster, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Allen, K. M. S. (1990). Part IV: Applications: 25-modelling early historic trade in The Eastern Great Lakes using geographic information systems. In.  K. M. S. Allen., S. W. Green., & E. B. W. Zubrow, Interpreting Space: GIS and archaeology (pp. 319 – 329). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Aldenderfer, M., & Maschner, H.D.G. (1996). Anthropology, space, and geographic information systems. Oxford University Press.

Basiron, N. F. Z., Ahmad, A., & Masron, T. (2014). Spatial analysis of international tourist movement to langkawi for 2010 and 2011. 4th International Conference on Tourism Research (4ICTR), SHS Web of Conferences, 12(01066). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141201066

British Archaeological Jobs Resource. (2004). A short guide to GPS. British: ©Souterrain Archaeological Services Ltd. http://www.bajr.org/Documents/AShortGuidetoGPS.pdf.

Church, T., Brandon, R.J., & Burgett, G.R. (2000). Chapter nine-gis applications in archaeology: Method in search of theory. In K. L. Wescott, & R. J. Brandon. Practical applications of GIS for archaeologists: A predictive modeling kit. Taylor & Francis.

Cochrane, D. (2016). Pioneering aerial archeology by Charles and Anne Lindbergh. https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/pioneering-aerial-archeology-charles-and-anne-lindbergh.

Connolly, J. & Lake, M. (2006). Geographical information systems in archaeology-reprinted 2007. Cambridge University Press.

Evans, T.L. & Daly, P. (2006). Digital archaeology-bridging method and theory. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Fagan, B.M. & DeCorse, C.R. (2005). In the beginning: An introduction to archaeology. Pearson, Prentice Hall.

Foresman, T.W. (1998). The history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the Pioneers. Practice-Hall, Inc.

Gamble, C. (2008). Archaeology: The basic (2nd Edition). Routledge.

Gregory, I. N., & Ell, P. S. (2007). Historical GIS-technologies, methodologies and scholarship. Cambridge University Press.

Giardino, M., & Haley, B.S. (2006). 4-Airborne Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis. In J. K. Johnson, Remote sensing in archaeology-An explicitly North American Perspective (pp. 47-78). The University of Alabama Press.

Harris, T.M. (2002). Chapter ten: GIS in archaeology. In A. K. Knowles, Past time, past place: GIS for history (pp. 131-144). ESRI Press.

Jackson, J.M. (1990). Part IV: Applications: 22-building an historic settlement database in GIS. In K. M. S., Allen, S.W. Green, & E. B. W. Zubrow, Interpreting space: GIS and archaeology (pp. 274-283). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Johnson, J. K. (2006). Remote Sensing in Archaeology - An explicitly North American Perspective. The University of Alabama Press.

Jubit, N., Masron, T., Puyok, A., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Geographic distribution of voter turnout, ethnic turnout and vote choices in Johor State Election. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 19(4), 64-76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2023-1904-05

Knowles, A. K. (2002). Past time, past place: GIS for history. ESRI Press.

Kvamme, K. L. (1995). 1-A View from across the water: The North American experience in archaeological GIS. In G. Lock, & Z. Stančič, Archaeology and geographical information systems: A European perspective (pp. 1-14). Taylor & Fancis Inc.

Kvamme, K. L. (2006). Section 1: Introduction: 1 there and back again: Revisiting archaeological locational modeling. In M. W. Mehrer, & K. L. Wescott, GIS and archaeological site location modelling (pp. 3-40). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Limp, W. F. (1987). The identification of archaeological site patterning through integration of remote sensing, geographic information systems, and explanatory data analysis. Ms. on file at the Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Fayetteville.

Lock, G., & Stančič, Z. (1995). Archaeology and geographical information systems: A European perspective. Taylor & Fancis Inc.

Lock, G. (2000). Beyond the map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies. IOS Press.

Lock, G. (2003). Using computers in archaeology-towards virtual pasts. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Lock, G. & Molyneaux, B.L. (2006). Confronting scale in archaeology-issues of theory and practice. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Madry, S. L. H., & Crumley, C. L. (1990). Part IV: Applications: 28-an application of remote sensing and GIS in Regional Archaeological Settlement Pattern Analysis: The Arroux River Valley, Burgundy, France. In K. M. S. Allen, S. W. Green, & E. B. W. Zubrow. Interpreting space: GIS and archaeology (pp. 364-380). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Marzuki, A., Bagheri, M., Ahmad, A., Masron, T., & Akhir, M. F. (2023). Establishing a GIS-SMCDA model of sustainable eco-tourism development in Pahang, Malaysia. Episodes: Journal of International Geoscience, 46(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2022/022037

McPherron, S. P., & Dibble, H. L. (2002). Using computers in archaeology: Practical guide. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Mehrer, M. W., & Wescott, K. L. (2006). GIS and archaeological site location modeling. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Mohd Ayob, N., Ahmad, A., & Mohamed, B. (2013). Spatial distributions of tourist in Langkawi Island. Proceedings of International Conference on Tourism Development, pp. 301-309.

Mohd Ayob, N., Masron, T., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Taburan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi pelancong domestik mengikut lokasi di Pulau Langkawi. International Journal of Environment, Society and Space, 2(2), 35–49.

Okabe, A. (2006). 1-Introduction. In A. Okabe, GIS-based studies in the humanities and social sciences pp. 1-18). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Parcak, S. H. (2009). Satellite remote sensing for archaeologist. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Reid, B. A. (2008). Introduction - Archaeology and geoinformatics: Case studies from the Caribbean. In B. A. Reid (Ed.). Archaeology and geoinformatics: Case studies from the Caribbean (pp. 1-12). The University of Alabama Press.

Robertson E. C., Seibert, J. D., Fernandez, D. C., & Zender M. U. (2006). Space and spatial analysis in archaeology. University of Calgary Press.

Samat, N., Farhi, S. K., Nik Hussain, N. H., Ghazali, S., & Masron, T. (2010). Bab 17-aplikasi sistem maklumat geografi dan analisis ruangan dalam memahami corak petempatan penduduk di Lembah Bujang. In S. Chia, & H. M. Isa. Archaeological heritage of Malaysia (pp. 291-301). Pusat Penyelidikan Arkeologi Global, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Tennant, E. W. (2005). Using ArcGIS to create ‘living documents’ with archaeological data: A case study from Svalbard, Norway. [Master’s diseertation, Michigan Technology University].

Tennant, E. W. (2007). A Sample geodatabase structure for managing archaeological data and resources with ArcGIS. Technical Briefs in Historical Archaeology. https://sha.org/assets/documents/Technical_briefs_articles/vol2article_02.pdf.

Tsumura, H. (2006). 13-Site-Catchment analysis of prehistoric settlements by reconstructing paleoenvironments with GIS. In A. Okabe (Ed.). GIS-based studies in the humanities and social sciences (pp.175-190). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

Verhagen, J. W. H. P. (2007). Case studies in archaeological predictive modelling. Leiden University Press.

Wescott, K.L., & Brandon, R.J. (2000). Practical Applications of GIS for Archaeologists: A Predictive Modeling Kit. Taylor & Francis.

Wheatley, D., & Gillings, M. (2002). Spatial technology and archaeology: The archaeological applications of GIS. Taylor & Francis Inc.

Wilbanks, T. J. (2004). Chapter 1: Geography and technology. In S. D. Brunn, S. L. Cutter, & J. W. Harrington. Geography and technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wiseman, J., & El-Baz, F. (2007). Remote Sensing in archaeology. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

Zakaria, Y. S., Ahmad, A., Said, M. Z., Epa, A. E., Ariffin, N. A., M Muslim, A., Akhir, M. F., & Hussin, R. (2023). GIS and oil spill tracking model in forecasting potential oil spill-affected areas along Terengganu and Pahang Coastal Area. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 21(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.13


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2101.42

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


-


 

_________________________________________________

eISSN 1823-884x

Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA

© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia