The Impact of Implementing Devolution on Citizen Participation and Service Provision in Sunningdale, Harare, Zimbabwe

Abstract

In this paper we examine how devolution, as mandated by Zimbabwe’s 2013 Constitution, affects local governance, focusing on citizen participation and service delivery in Ward 10 of Sunningdale, Harare. Although devolution is enshrined in the Zimbabwean constitution, the actual implementation has been fraught with inconsistencies between policy and practice. Centralized decision-making has hindered local authorities from fully exercising their powers, limiting citizen engagement in governance and effective service provision. In this study we utilised an interpretive methodological approach to examine the data that was collected through semi-structured interviews and online focus group discussions with local government officials, experts, and Sunningdale residents. The findings reveal a mixed understanding of devolution among residents, with most lacking access to information about its implications. Though residents expressed hope that devolution could improve services such as water provision and housing, political and institutional challenges continue to undermine its effective implementation. Local government experts suggest that successful devolution in Zimbabwe requires empowering local authorities with greater financial control and decision-making autonomy. The study highlights the importance of education and awareness programmes to enhance citizen understanding of devolution, as well as the need for a clear legislative framework to support the decentralization process. We conclude that while devolution holds promise for improving governance and service delivery, its success depends on political will, institutional capacity, and genuine citizen engagement.

References

ActionAid Denmark. (2014). The dynamics of devolution in Zimbabwe: A briefing paper on local democracy. ActionAid Denmark.

Chigiya-Mujeni, F. (2021). Financing devolution in a COVID-19 environment: The status of devolution in Zimbabwe. Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(2), 307–322.

Chirisa, I., Muzenda, A., & Manyeruke, C. (2013). The devolution debate and the new constitution of Zimbabwe: An exploratory evaluation. Southern Peace Review Journal, 2(2), 84–102.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.

Hussein, M. K. (2006). Capacity building challenges in Malawi’s local government reform programme. Development Southern Africa, 23(3), 371–383.

Jonga, W. (2014). Local government system in Zimbabwe and associated challenges: Synthesis and antithesis. Archives of Business Research, 2(1), 75–98.

Kurebwa, J. (2015). A review of rural local government system in Zimbabwe from 1980 to 2014. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(2), 94–108.

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Family Health International.

Makumbe, J. M. (1996). Participatory development: The case of Zimbabwe. University of Zimbabwe Publications.

Mapuva, J. (2015). The controversies of devolution in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Political Science and Development, 3(5), 183–192.

Moloto, P. I., & Moeti, K. B. (2024). An assessment of how Polokwane Local Municipality executes their mandate in water supply to Matlou and Letsokoane residents. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(2), 404–415.

Moyo, P., & Ncube, C. (2014). Devolution of power in Zimbabwe’s new constitutional order: Opportunities and potential constraints. Law, Democracy and Development, 18, 218–234.

Mudau, P., & Nyane, H. (2022). A critical analysis of Zimbabwe’s non-implementation of constitutional injunctions on devolution. Southern African Public Law, 37(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/9584

Muchadenyika, D. (2017). Civil society, social accountability and service delivery in Zimbabwe. Development Policy Review, 35, 178–195.

Muchadenyika, D., & Williams, J. J. (2016). Social change: Urban governance and urbanization in Zimbabwe. Urban Forum, 27, 253–274.

Mugabi, E. (2004). Uganda’s decentralisation policy, legal framework, local government structure and service delivery. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA).

Muringani, J., Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). Decentralisation, quality of government and economic growth. Revista de Economía Mundial, 51, 25–50.

Ncube, C., Moyo, P., & Moyo, G. (2015). Can devolution aid the construction of a democratic developmental state in Zimbabwe? Ubuntu: Journal of Conflict and Social Transformation, 4(2), 49–73.

Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500.

Rondinelli, D. A. (1981). Administrative decentralisation and economic development: The Sudan's experiment with devolution. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 19(4), 595–624.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Sims, B. M. (2013). Conceptualising local government: Local perceptions on devolution and participation in Zimbabwe. IDASA.

Smoke, P., Loffler, G., & Bosi, G. (2013). The role of decentralisation/devolution in improving development outcomes at the local level: Review of the literature and selected cases. Brooklyn, NY: Local Development International LLC UK Aid.

Suwardi, D., & Saad, S. (2024). Challenges in public-private partnership (PPP) projects in Malaysia. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(4), 287–299.

Taruvinga, G. R. (2023). The politicisation of local government in Zimbabwe. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 45(2), 118–127.

Treisman, D. (2009). The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralisation. Public Administration, 87(4), 972–989.

Yuliani, E. L. (2004, April 27-30). Decentralization, deconcentration and devolution: What do they mean? [Paper presentation]. The Interlaken Workshop on Decentralization, Interlaken, Switzerland.